Co2 fossil plus land use in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Co2 fossil plus land use was 18.80 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Co2 fossil plus land use in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1885–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 fossil plus land use in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 18.80 million, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 1.9% on the previous year and up 8.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 21.54 million in 2016 and was at its lowest, -5.47 million, in 1994.
That places Bosnia and Herzegovina 111th out of 192 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1885 | 9.85 million | — |
| 1890 | 10.29 million | +4.5% |
| 1891 | 10.16 million | -1.3% |
| 1892 | 10.34 million | +1.8% |
| 1893 | 10.50 million | +1.5% |
| 1894 | 10.44 million | -0.6% |
| 1895 | 10.44 million | -0.1% |
| 1896 | 10.55 million | +1.1% |
| 1897 | 10.60 million | +0.5% |
| 1898 | 10.57 million | -0.3% |
| 1899 | 10.47 million | -1.0% |
| 1900 | 10.61 million | +1.4% |
| 1901 | 10.61 million | -0.0% |
| 1902 | 10.47 million | -1.3% |
| 1903 | 10.65 million | +1.7% |
| 1904 | 10.77 million | +1.1% |
| 1905 | 10.63 million | -1.2% |
| 1906 | 10.61 million | -0.2% |
| 1907 | 10.71 million | +0.9% |
| 1908 | 10.75 million | +0.4% |
| 1909 | 10.65 million | -1.0% |
| 1910 | 11.54 million | +8.4% |
| 1911 | 12.15 million | +5.3% |
| 1912 | 12.31 million | +1.3% |
| 1913 | 12.89 million | +4.7% |
| 1919 | 13.46 million | +4.4% |
| 1920 | 13.56 million | +0.8% |
| 1921 | 13.67 million | +0.8% |
| 1922 | 13.71 million | +0.3% |
| 1923 | 13.73 million | +0.1% |
| 1924 | 13.55 million | -1.3% |
| 1925 | 13.70 million | +1.1% |
| 1926 | 13.39 million | -2.3% |
| 1927 | 13.95 million | +4.2% |
| 1928 | 14.07 million | +0.9% |
| 1929 | 13.87 million | -1.4% |
| 1930 | 12.78 million | -7.9% |
| 1931 | 12.43 million | -2.7% |
| 1932 | 11.96 million | -3.8% |
| 1933 | 11.63 million | -2.8% |
| 1934 | 11.43 million | -1.7% |
| 1935 | 11.56 million | +1.1% |
| 1936 | 11.17 million | -3.3% |
| 1937 | 10.88 million | -2.6% |
| 1938 | 11.02 million | +1.2% |
| 1939 | 10.98 million | -0.4% |
| 1940 | 9.22 million | -16.0% |
| 1943 | 6.91 million | -25.0% |
| 1944 | 6.07 million | -12.2% |
| 1945 | 6.72 million | +10.7% |
| 1946 | 7.61 million | +13.2% |
| 1947 | 7.64 million | +0.4% |
| 1948 | 7.59 million | -0.6% |
| 1949 | 7.90 million | +4.1% |
| 1950 | 7.44 million | -5.8% |
| 1951 | 6.38 million | -14.2% |
| 1952 | 6.50 million | +1.9% |
| 1953 | 5.55 million | -14.7% |
| 1954 | 5.43 million | -2.2% |
| 1955 | 4.60 million | -15.2% |
| 1956 | 3.99 million | -13.4% |
| 1957 | 3.01 million | -24.6% |
| 1958 | 586,846 | -80.5% |
| 1959 | -2.49 million | -524.6% |
| 1960 | -1.90 million | -23.8% |
| 1961 | -1.68 million | -11.2% |
| 1962 | -1.74 million | +3.0% |
| 1963 | -795,268 | -54.2% |
| 1964 | -31,316 | -96.1% |
| 1965 | 183,146 | -684.8% |
| 1966 | 312,299 | +70.5% |
| 1967 | 427,130 | +36.8% |
| 1968 | 1.04 million | +143.9% |
| 1969 | 1.29 million | +23.7% |
| 1970 | 3.75 million | +191.1% |
| 1971 | 4.91 million | +30.9% |
| 1972 | 4.01 million | -18.3% |
| 1973 | 6.45 million | +60.7% |
| 1974 | 6.50 million | +0.8% |
| 1975 | 7.23 million | +11.2% |
| 1976 | 7.49 million | +3.7% |
| 1977 | 7.81 million | +4.2% |
| 1978 | 9.15 million | +17.1% |
| 1979 | 11.91 million | +30.2% |
| 1980 | 11.30 million | -5.1% |
| 1981 | 12.75 million | +12.8% |
| 1982 | 11.58 million | -9.2% |
| 1983 | 13.19 million | +13.9% |
| 1984 | 14.12 million | +7.1% |
| 1985 | 15.09 million | +6.9% |
| 1986 | 15.84 million | +5.0% |
| 1987 | 15.57 million | -1.7% |
| 1988 | 16.48 million | +5.9% |
| 1989 | 16.48 million | -0.0% |
| 1990 | 13.21 million | -19.9% |
| 1991 | 4.39 million | -66.7% |
| 1992 | 4.54 million | +3.2% |
| 1993 | 2.35 million | -48.2% |
| 1994 | -5.47 million | -332.8% |
| 1995 | -4.52 million | -17.3% |
| 1996 | -4.13 million | -8.8% |
| 1997 | 4.27 million | -203.5% |
| 1998 | 4.17 million | -2.3% |
| 1999 | 5.12 million | +22.6% |
| 2000 | 7.31 million | +42.9% |
| 2001 | 6.24 million | -14.7% |
| 2002 | 10.74 million | +72.1% |
| 2003 | 9.78 million | -8.9% |
| 2004 | 9.85 million | +0.7% |
| 2005 | 10.50 million | +6.6% |
| 2006 | 11.47 million | +9.2% |
| 2007 | 13.02 million | +13.5% |
| 2008 | 14.97 million | +15.0% |
| 2009 | 16.86 million | +12.6% |
| 2010 | 17.02 million | +1.0% |
| 2011 | 19.65 million | +15.4% |
| 2012 | 19.43 million | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 18.36 million | -5.5% |
| 2014 | 17.38 million | -5.4% |
| 2015 | 17.92 million | +3.1% |
| 2016 | 21.54 million | +20.2% |
| 2017 | 20.08 million | -6.7% |
| 2018 | 20.61 million | +2.6% |
| 2019 | 21.00 million | +1.9% |
| 2020 | 20.74 million | -1.3% |
| 2021 | 19.96 million | -3.7% |
| 2022 | 19.86 million | -0.5% |
| 2023 | 19.17 million | -3.5% |
| 2024 | 18.80 million | -1.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 9.85 million | 9.85 million | 9.85 million | 1 |
| 1890s | 10.44 million | 10.16 million | 10.60 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 10.65 million | 10.47 million | 10.77 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 12.47 million | 11.54 million | 13.46 million | 5 |
| 1920s | 13.72 million | 13.39 million | 14.07 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 11.58 million | 10.88 million | 12.78 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 7.46 million | 6.07 million | 9.22 million | 8 |
| 1950s | 4.10 million | -2.49 million | 7.44 million | 10 |
| 1960s | -289,110 | -1.90 million | 1.29 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 6.92 million | 3.75 million | 11.91 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 14.24 million | 11.30 million | 16.48 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.39 million | -5.47 million | 13.21 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.07 million | 6.24 million | 16.86 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 19.30 million | 17.02 million | 21.54 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 19.71 million | 18.80 million | 20.74 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
More climate change data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,553 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 578.84 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,974 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 70.49 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 317.19 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 299.82 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 17.37 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.13 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.6205 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 18.80 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 21.54 million in 2016.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was -5.47 million in 1994.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 111th out of 192 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 129 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).