Co2 fossil plus land use in Guatemala
Guatemala: Co2 fossil plus land use was 49.46 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
49.46 million
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
68th
of 194 countries
All-time high
111.25 million
in 1983
All-time low
2.25 million
in 1892
Years of data
155
1870–2024
Co2 fossil plus land use in Guatemala, 1870–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 fossil plus land use in Guatemala is 49.46 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 16.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Guatemala peaked at 111.25 million in 1983 and was at its lowest, 2.25 million, in 1892.
That places Guatemala 68th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1870 | 6.15 million | — |
| 1871 | 5.28 million | -14.2% |
| 1872 | 4.31 million | -18.3% |
| 1873 | 5.29 million | +22.7% |
| 1874 | 6.21 million | +17.4% |
| 1875 | 4.69 million | -24.4% |
| 1876 | 4.25 million | -9.5% |
| 1877 | 3.86 million | -9.0% |
| 1878 | 4.93 million | +27.6% |
| 1879 | 4.68 million | -4.9% |
| 1880 | 5.13 million | +9.5% |
| 1881 | 3.66 million | -28.7% |
| 1882 | 3.38 million | -7.7% |
| 1883 | 3.76 million | +11.3% |
| 1884 | 2.68 million | -28.6% |
| 1885 | 2.35 million | -12.5% |
| 1886 | 2.49 million | +6.1% |
| 1887 | 2.82 million | +13.3% |
| 1888 | 2.32 million | -17.8% |
| 1889 | 2.46 million | +6.1% |
| 1890 | 2.29 million | -7.0% |
| 1891 | 2.52 million | +10.4% |
| 1892 | 2.25 million | -10.9% |
| 1893 | 2.50 million | +11.4% |
| 1894 | 2.51 million | +0.2% |
| 1895 | 2.38 million | -5.1% |
| 1896 | 2.42 million | +1.5% |
| 1897 | 2.29 million | -5.1% |
| 1898 | 2.92 million | +27.5% |
| 1899 | 2.54 million | -13.0% |
| 1900 | 3.12 million | +22.6% |
| 1901 | 3.66 million | +17.6% |
| 1902 | 4.98 million | +36.0% |
| 1903 | 5.41 million | +8.6% |
| 1904 | 4.53 million | -16.4% |
| 1905 | 5.99 million | +32.3% |
| 1906 | 5.58 million | -6.8% |
| 1907 | 4.77 million | -14.4% |
| 1908 | 5.70 million | +19.3% |
| 1909 | 7.29 million | +27.9% |
| 1910 | 7.99 million | +9.7% |
| 1911 | 7.19 million | -10.0% |
| 1912 | 7.30 million | +1.4% |
| 1913 | 7.42 million | +1.7% |
| 1914 | 7.91 million | +6.5% |
| 1915 | 6.26 million | -20.8% |
| 1916 | 6.66 million | +6.4% |
| 1917 | 6.00 million | -10.0% |
| 1918 | 6.03 million | +0.5% |
| 1919 | 8.17 million | +35.5% |
| 1920 | 9.30 million | +13.9% |
| 1921 | 8.80 million | -5.4% |
| 1922 | 8.03 million | -8.7% |
| 1923 | 8.79 million | +9.5% |
| 1924 | 8.47 million | -3.7% |
| 1925 | 11.97 million | +41.3% |
| 1926 | 10.20 million | -14.8% |
| 1927 | 9.88 million | -3.2% |
| 1928 | 9.05 million | -8.4% |
| 1929 | 8.82 million | -2.5% |
| 1930 | 13.49 million | +52.8% |
| 1931 | 19.59 million | +45.2% |
| 1932 | 18.69 million | -4.6% |
| 1933 | 19.83 million | +6.1% |
| 1934 | 22.88 million | +15.4% |
| 1935 | 22.49 million | -1.7% |
| 1936 | 24.43 million | +8.6% |
| 1937 | 25.15 million | +2.9% |
| 1938 | 23.62 million | -6.1% |
| 1939 | 25.94 million | +9.8% |
| 1940 | 33.45 million | +29.0% |
| 1941 | 41.10 million | +22.9% |
| 1942 | 44.03 million | +7.1% |
| 1943 | 48.89 million | +11.0% |
| 1944 | 49.04 million | +0.3% |
| 1945 | 47.58 million | -3.0% |
| 1946 | 51.67 million | +8.6% |
| 1947 | 51.30 million | -0.7% |
| 1948 | 49.98 million | -2.6% |
| 1949 | 62.79 million | +25.6% |
| 1950 | 63.23 million | +0.7% |
| 1951 | 62.03 million | -1.9% |
| 1952 | 59.03 million | -4.8% |
| 1953 | 57.27 million | -3.0% |
| 1954 | 53.69 million | -6.2% |
| 1955 | 51.80 million | -3.5% |
| 1956 | 57.24 million | +10.5% |
| 1957 | 54.27 million | -5.2% |
| 1958 | 54.77 million | +0.9% |
| 1959 | 58.65 million | +7.1% |
| 1960 | 47.19 million | -19.5% |
| 1961 | 33.91 million | -28.1% |
| 1962 | 28.39 million | -16.3% |
| 1963 | 25.14 million | -11.4% |
| 1964 | 22.85 million | -9.1% |
| 1965 | 22.65 million | -0.8% |
| 1966 | 22.59 million | -0.3% |
| 1967 | 22.31 million | -1.2% |
| 1968 | 19.15 million | -14.2% |
| 1969 | 19.25 million | +0.5% |
| 1970 | 20.08 million | +4.3% |
| 1971 | 22.59 million | +12.5% |
| 1972 | 27.73 million | +22.8% |
| 1973 | 32.36 million | +16.7% |
| 1974 | 27.78 million | -14.2% |
| 1975 | 31.56 million | +13.6% |
| 1976 | 37.68 million | +19.4% |
| 1977 | 38.29 million | +1.6% |
| 1978 | 31.82 million | -16.9% |
| 1979 | 31.53 million | -0.9% |
| 1980 | 27.94 million | -11.4% |
| 1981 | 29.49 million | +5.6% |
| 1982 | 30.62 million | +3.8% |
| 1983 | 111.25 million | +263.4% |
| 1984 | 55.94 million | -49.7% |
| 1985 | 43.06 million | -23.0% |
| 1986 | 35.39 million | -17.8% |
| 1987 | 101.15 million | +185.8% |
| 1988 | 56.28 million | -44.4% |
| 1989 | 44.04 million | -21.7% |
| 1990 | 38.66 million | -12.2% |
| 1991 | 37.29 million | -3.6% |
| 1992 | 68.07 million | +82.6% |
| 1993 | 56.44 million | -17.1% |
| 1994 | 60.28 million | +6.8% |
| 1995 | 47.01 million | -22.0% |
| 1996 | 59.59 million | +26.8% |
| 1997 | 85.07 million | +42.8% |
| 1998 | 74.18 million | -12.8% |
| 1999 | 76.28 million | +2.8% |
| 2000 | 76.36 million | +0.1% |
| 2001 | 71.24 million | -6.7% |
| 2002 | 78.64 million | +10.4% |
| 2003 | 52.12 million | -33.7% |
| 2004 | 37.42 million | -28.2% |
| 2005 | 40.60 million | +8.5% |
| 2006 | 58.25 million | +43.5% |
| 2007 | 48.40 million | -16.9% |
| 2008 | 39.53 million | -18.3% |
| 2009 | 38.16 million | -3.5% |
| 2010 | 33.08 million | -13.3% |
| 2011 | 30.98 million | -6.4% |
| 2012 | 28.58 million | -7.7% |
| 2013 | 39.13 million | +36.9% |
| 2014 | 59.14 million | +51.2% |
| 2015 | 51.52 million | -12.9% |
| 2016 | 48.81 million | -5.3% |
| 2017 | 48.56 million | -0.5% |
| 2018 | 50.20 million | +3.4% |
| 2019 | 52.11 million | +3.8% |
| 2020 | 46.22 million | -11.3% |
| 2021 | 47.23 million | +2.2% |
| 2022 | 47.64 million | +0.9% |
| 2023 | 49.45 million | +3.8% |
| 2024 | 49.46 million | +0.0% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 49.46 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.44 million, 2.0× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 49.46 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 3.4× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 fossil plus land use in Guatemala changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1983 | +263.4% | 30.62 million | 111.25 million |
| 1987 | +185.8% | 35.39 million | 101.15 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 4.96 million | 3.86 million | 6.21 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 3.10 million | 2.32 million | 5.13 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.46 million | 2.25 million | 2.92 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 5.10 million | 3.12 million | 7.29 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 7.09 million | 6.00 million | 8.17 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 9.33 million | 8.03 million | 11.97 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 21.61 million | 13.49 million | 25.94 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 47.98 million | 33.45 million | 62.79 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 57.20 million | 51.80 million | 63.23 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 26.34 million | 19.15 million | 47.19 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 30.14 million | 20.08 million | 38.29 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 53.52 million | 27.94 million | 111.25 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 60.29 million | 37.29 million | 85.07 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 54.07 million | 37.42 million | 78.64 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 44.21 million | 28.58 million | 59.14 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 48.00 million | 46.22 million | 49.46 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More climate change data for Guatemala
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 248.53 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 11,983 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,365 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,617 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 12.7 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 307.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,636 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,566 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 69.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.91 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Guatemala?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Guatemala was 49.46 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 111.25 million in 1983.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.25 million in 1892.
- How does Guatemala rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Guatemala ranks 68th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 155 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).