Co2 fossil plus land use in Latvia
Latvia: Co2 fossil plus land use was 9.41 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
9.41 million
Change on year
up 1.3%
World rank
129th
of 194 countries
All-time high
28.02 million
in 1985
All-time low
-3.70 million
in 2000
Years of data
169
1850–2024
Co2 fossil plus land use in Latvia, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 9.41 million for co2 fossil plus land use in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.3% on the previous year and up 23.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Latvia peaked at 28.02 million in 1985 and was at its lowest, -3.70 million, in 2000.
That places Latvia 129th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 11.04 million | — |
| 1855 | 11.05 million | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 11.12 million | +0.6% |
| 1859 | 11.29 million | +1.6% |
| 1860 | 10.67 million | -5.5% |
| 1861 | 10.53 million | -1.3% |
| 1862 | 10.46 million | -0.7% |
| 1863 | 10.50 million | +0.4% |
| 1864 | 10.42 million | -0.8% |
| 1865 | 10.40 million | -0.2% |
| 1866 | 10.26 million | -1.4% |
| 1867 | 10.40 million | +1.4% |
| 1868 | 10.28 million | -1.2% |
| 1869 | 10.32 million | +0.4% |
| 1870 | 10.48 million | +1.6% |
| 1871 | 10.33 million | -1.4% |
| 1872 | 10.31 million | -0.2% |
| 1873 | 10.30 million | -0.1% |
| 1874 | 10.37 million | +0.6% |
| 1875 | 10.34 million | -0.3% |
| 1876 | 10.36 million | +0.3% |
| 1877 | 10.39 million | +0.2% |
| 1878 | 10.52 million | +1.3% |
| 1879 | 10.55 million | +0.2% |
| 1880 | 10.55 million | -0.0% |
| 1881 | 10.48 million | -0.7% |
| 1882 | 10.60 million | +1.2% |
| 1883 | 10.75 million | +1.4% |
| 1884 | 10.78 million | +0.3% |
| 1885 | 10.73 million | -0.4% |
| 1886 | 10.74 million | +0.1% |
| 1887 | 10.84 million | +1.0% |
| 1888 | 10.82 million | -0.3% |
| 1889 | 10.85 million | +0.3% |
| 1890 | 11.05 million | +1.9% |
| 1891 | 11.02 million | -0.2% |
| 1892 | 10.91 million | -1.0% |
| 1893 | 10.88 million | -0.3% |
| 1894 | 10.85 million | -0.3% |
| 1895 | 11.03 million | +1.7% |
| 1896 | 11.03 million | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 11.12 million | +0.8% |
| 1898 | 11.32 million | +1.8% |
| 1899 | 11.37 million | +0.4% |
| 1900 | 11.38 million | +0.2% |
| 1901 | 11.62 million | +2.1% |
| 1902 | 11.42 million | -1.7% |
| 1903 | 11.60 million | +1.6% |
| 1904 | 11.61 million | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 11.61 million | -0.0% |
| 1906 | 11.67 million | +0.5% |
| 1907 | 11.77 million | +0.8% |
| 1908 | 11.81 million | +0.4% |
| 1909 | 11.92 million | +0.9% |
| 1910 | 10.25 million | -14.0% |
| 1911 | 9.77 million | -4.7% |
| 1912 | 9.53 million | -2.5% |
| 1913 | 9.35 million | -1.9% |
| 1914 | 9.06 million | -3.1% |
| 1915 | 8.86 million | -2.3% |
| 1916 | 8.57 million | -3.2% |
| 1917 | 8.37 million | -2.4% |
| 1918 | 7.84 million | -6.3% |
| 1919 | 7.57 million | -3.5% |
| 1920 | 7.48 million | -1.1% |
| 1921 | 7.35 million | -1.7% |
| 1922 | 7.28 million | -1.0% |
| 1923 | 7.13 million | -2.0% |
| 1924 | 7.14 million | +0.1% |
| 1925 | 7.09 million | -0.6% |
| 1926 | 7.06 million | -0.4% |
| 1927 | 6.99 million | -1.0% |
| 1928 | 6.97 million | -0.4% |
| 1929 | 7.12 million | +2.1% |
| 1930 | 6.67 million | -6.3% |
| 1931 | 6.73 million | +0.9% |
| 1932 | 6.75 million | +0.4% |
| 1933 | 6.72 million | -0.5% |
| 1934 | 6.92 million | +3.0% |
| 1935 | 6.97 million | +0.8% |
| 1936 | 7.31 million | +4.8% |
| 1937 | 7.07 million | -3.3% |
| 1938 | 7.26 million | +2.8% |
| 1939 | 7.11 million | -2.1% |
| 1940 | 7.06 million | -0.7% |
| 1941 | 6.38 million | -9.7% |
| 1942 | 4.73 million | -25.9% |
| 1943 | 4.44 million | -6.0% |
| 1944 | 4.84 million | +8.9% |
| 1945 | 4.66 million | -3.7% |
| 1946 | 4.64 million | -0.4% |
| 1947 | 4.92 million | +6.0% |
| 1948 | 4.75 million | -3.5% |
| 1949 | 5.12 million | +7.9% |
| 1950 | 5.56 million | +8.6% |
| 1951 | 6.55 million | +17.8% |
| 1952 | 7.74 million | +18.1% |
| 1953 | 8.54 million | +10.3% |
| 1954 | 9.55 million | +11.8% |
| 1955 | 10.92 million | +14.4% |
| 1956 | 12.07 million | +10.5% |
| 1957 | 13.23 million | +9.7% |
| 1958 | 14.04 million | +6.1% |
| 1959 | 14.75 million | +5.0% |
| 1960 | 13.41 million | -9.1% |
| 1961 | 13.88 million | +3.5% |
| 1962 | 13.32 million | -4.1% |
| 1963 | 13.83 million | +3.8% |
| 1964 | 14.75 million | +6.6% |
| 1965 | 14.84 million | +0.6% |
| 1966 | 15.52 million | +4.6% |
| 1967 | 16.03 million | +3.3% |
| 1968 | 17.08 million | +6.5% |
| 1969 | 17.03 million | -0.3% |
| 1970 | 17.67 million | +3.8% |
| 1971 | 19.03 million | +7.7% |
| 1972 | 19.91 million | +4.6% |
| 1973 | 21.09 million | +5.9% |
| 1974 | 20.98 million | -0.5% |
| 1975 | 22.49 million | +7.2% |
| 1976 | 23.33 million | +3.8% |
| 1977 | 23.59 million | +1.1% |
| 1978 | 24.04 million | +1.9% |
| 1979 | 24.58 million | +2.2% |
| 1980 | 25.50 million | +3.7% |
| 1981 | 25.48 million | -0.1% |
| 1982 | 25.72 million | +0.9% |
| 1983 | 25.76 million | +0.2% |
| 1984 | 26.13 million | +1.4% |
| 1985 | 28.02 million | +7.2% |
| 1986 | 25.51 million | -8.9% |
| 1987 | 20.96 million | -17.8% |
| 1988 | 20.38 million | -2.8% |
| 1989 | 19.46 million | -4.5% |
| 1990 | 21.19 million | +8.9% |
| 1991 | 19.82 million | -6.5% |
| 1992 | 15.77 million | -20.4% |
| 1993 | 23.81 million | +51.0% |
| 1994 | 1.19 million | -95.0% |
| 1995 | 3.16 million | +166.4% |
| 1996 | 614,633 | -80.5% |
| 1997 | -287,687 | -146.8% |
| 1998 | -2.64 million | +816.7% |
| 1999 | -1.68 million | -36.3% |
| 2000 | -3.70 million | +120.1% |
| 2001 | -1.80 million | -51.3% |
| 2002 | -2.19 million | +21.4% |
| 2003 | 3.51 million | -260.6% |
| 2004 | 10.52 million | +199.5% |
| 2005 | 14.96 million | +42.2% |
| 2006 | 7.51 million | -49.8% |
| 2007 | 6.13 million | -18.3% |
| 2008 | 6.06 million | -1.1% |
| 2009 | 4.82 million | -20.5% |
| 2010 | 6.73 million | +39.7% |
| 2011 | 7.54 million | +12.0% |
| 2012 | 9.13 million | +21.0% |
| 2013 | 7.23 million | -20.7% |
| 2014 | 7.62 million | +5.4% |
| 2015 | 11.29 million | +48.2% |
| 2016 | 8.49 million | -24.8% |
| 2017 | 8.22 million | -3.2% |
| 2018 | 10.46 million | +27.3% |
| 2019 | 9.56 million | -8.6% |
| 2020 | 8.90 million | -6.9% |
| 2021 | 8.50 million | -4.5% |
| 2022 | 8.87 million | +4.4% |
| 2023 | 9.29 million | +4.7% |
| 2024 | 9.41 million | +1.3% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 9.41 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 26% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 9.41 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 29% of the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 fossil plus land use in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | -816.7% | -287,687 | -2.64 million |
| 2003 | +260.6% | -2.19 million | 3.51 million |
| 2004 | +199.5% | 3.51 million | 10.52 million |
| 1995 | +166.4% | 1.19 million | 3.16 million |
| 1997 | -146.8% | 614,633 | -287,687 |
| 2000 | -120.1% | -1.68 million | -3.70 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 11.13 million | 11.04 million | 11.29 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 10.42 million | 10.26 million | 10.67 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 10.40 million | 10.30 million | 10.55 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 10.71 million | 10.48 million | 10.85 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 11.06 million | 10.85 million | 11.37 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 11.64 million | 11.38 million | 11.92 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 8.92 million | 7.57 million | 10.25 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 7.16 million | 6.97 million | 7.48 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 6.95 million | 6.67 million | 7.31 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 5.15 million | 4.44 million | 7.06 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 10.30 million | 5.56 million | 14.75 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 14.97 million | 13.32 million | 17.08 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 21.67 million | 17.67 million | 24.58 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 24.29 million | 19.46 million | 28.02 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.09 million | -2.64 million | 23.81 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.58 million | -3.70 million | 14.96 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.63 million | 6.73 million | 11.29 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 8.99 million | 8.50 million | 9.41 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More climate change data for Latvia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 43.09 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,340 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 263.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,077 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.9956 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 38.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 342.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 336.47 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.27 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Latvia?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Latvia was 9.41 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 28.02 million in 1985.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.70 million in 2000.
- How does Latvia rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Latvia ranks 129th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).