Co2 fossil plus land use in Nicaragua
Nicaragua: Co2 fossil plus land use was 15.01 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
15.01 million
Change on year
up 2.4%
World rank
115th
of 194 countries
All-time high
97.18 million
in 1999
All-time low
3.16 million
in 1870
Years of data
155
1870–2024
Co2 fossil plus land use in Nicaragua, 1870–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 fossil plus land use in Nicaragua is 15.01 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.4% on the previous year and up 20.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Nicaragua peaked at 97.18 million in 1999 and was at its lowest, 3.16 million, in 1870.
Nicaragua ranks 115th of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Nicaragua, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1870 | 3.16 million | — |
| 1871 | 4.35 million | +37.6% |
| 1872 | 7.29 million | +67.6% |
| 1873 | 6.25 million | -14.2% |
| 1874 | 8.38 million | +34.1% |
| 1875 | 6.65 million | -20.7% |
| 1876 | 9.00 million | +35.3% |
| 1877 | 9.32 million | +3.6% |
| 1878 | 8.35 million | -10.4% |
| 1879 | 8.34 million | -0.1% |
| 1880 | 7.79 million | -6.6% |
| 1881 | 7.15 million | -8.2% |
| 1882 | 7.03 million | -1.6% |
| 1883 | 9.83 million | +39.8% |
| 1884 | 10.18 million | +3.6% |
| 1885 | 11.03 million | +8.3% |
| 1886 | 9.35 million | -15.2% |
| 1887 | 8.19 million | -12.3% |
| 1888 | 7.43 million | -9.3% |
| 1889 | 9.50 million | +27.9% |
| 1890 | 10.70 million | +12.6% |
| 1891 | 9.74 million | -8.9% |
| 1892 | 11.71 million | +20.1% |
| 1893 | 8.76 million | -25.2% |
| 1894 | 11.97 million | +36.7% |
| 1895 | 12.43 million | +3.8% |
| 1896 | 12.93 million | +4.0% |
| 1897 | 11.19 million | -13.4% |
| 1898 | 9.24 million | -17.4% |
| 1899 | 11.43 million | +23.6% |
| 1900 | 9.62 million | -15.8% |
| 1901 | 10.11 million | +5.2% |
| 1902 | 12.64 million | +25.0% |
| 1903 | 11.97 million | -5.3% |
| 1904 | 10.72 million | -10.4% |
| 1905 | 12.88 million | +20.1% |
| 1906 | 14.26 million | +10.7% |
| 1907 | 9.74 million | -31.7% |
| 1908 | 11.22 million | +15.1% |
| 1909 | 13.40 million | +19.4% |
| 1910 | 11.31 million | -15.6% |
| 1911 | 12.46 million | +10.2% |
| 1912 | 12.72 million | +2.1% |
| 1913 | 12.11 million | -4.8% |
| 1914 | 11.17 million | -7.8% |
| 1915 | 16.33 million | +46.2% |
| 1916 | 13.70 million | -16.1% |
| 1917 | 13.17 million | -3.8% |
| 1918 | 14.03 million | +6.5% |
| 1919 | 12.89 million | -8.2% |
| 1920 | 18.74 million | +45.4% |
| 1921 | 29.08 million | +55.2% |
| 1922 | 29.44 million | +1.2% |
| 1923 | 30.14 million | +2.4% |
| 1924 | 34.11 million | +13.2% |
| 1925 | 31.30 million | -8.2% |
| 1926 | 31.24 million | -0.2% |
| 1927 | 33.64 million | +7.7% |
| 1928 | 32.22 million | -4.2% |
| 1929 | 28.51 million | -11.5% |
| 1930 | 33.52 million | +17.6% |
| 1931 | 33.63 million | +0.3% |
| 1932 | 31.48 million | -6.4% |
| 1933 | 32.44 million | +3.1% |
| 1934 | 33.91 million | +4.5% |
| 1935 | 32.87 million | -3.1% |
| 1936 | 31.93 million | -2.9% |
| 1937 | 31.93 million | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 35.81 million | +12.2% |
| 1939 | 31.31 million | -12.6% |
| 1940 | 38.29 million | +22.3% |
| 1941 | 45.96 million | +20.0% |
| 1942 | 50.49 million | +9.9% |
| 1943 | 50.93 million | +0.9% |
| 1944 | 49.74 million | -2.3% |
| 1945 | 51.48 million | +3.5% |
| 1946 | 53.82 million | +4.5% |
| 1947 | 47.17 million | -12.4% |
| 1948 | 52.50 million | +11.3% |
| 1949 | 50.46 million | -3.9% |
| 1950 | 54.19 million | +7.4% |
| 1951 | 54.15 million | -0.1% |
| 1952 | 59.53 million | +9.9% |
| 1953 | 65.92 million | +10.7% |
| 1954 | 64.80 million | -1.7% |
| 1955 | 70.13 million | +8.2% |
| 1956 | 70.11 million | -0.0% |
| 1957 | 71.47 million | +1.9% |
| 1958 | 76.17 million | +6.6% |
| 1959 | 77.98 million | +2.4% |
| 1960 | 56.38 million | -27.7% |
| 1961 | 38.80 million | -31.2% |
| 1962 | 34.44 million | -11.2% |
| 1963 | 34.54 million | +0.3% |
| 1964 | 28.53 million | -17.4% |
| 1965 | 28.94 million | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 21.33 million | -26.3% |
| 1967 | 20.91 million | -2.0% |
| 1968 | 18.20 million | -13.0% |
| 1969 | 16.46 million | -9.6% |
| 1970 | 17.54 million | +6.6% |
| 1971 | 15.57 million | -11.3% |
| 1972 | 20.60 million | +32.3% |
| 1973 | 16.07 million | -22.0% |
| 1974 | 17.47 million | +8.7% |
| 1975 | 15.56 million | -10.9% |
| 1976 | 24.19 million | +55.4% |
| 1977 | 18.75 million | -22.5% |
| 1978 | 18.14 million | -3.2% |
| 1979 | 20.59 million | +13.5% |
| 1980 | 34.38 million | +67.0% |
| 1981 | 36.15 million | +5.2% |
| 1982 | 24.12 million | -33.3% |
| 1983 | 28.78 million | +19.3% |
| 1984 | 35.64 million | +23.8% |
| 1985 | 25.63 million | -28.1% |
| 1986 | 23.27 million | -9.2% |
| 1987 | 32.50 million | +39.7% |
| 1988 | 36.82 million | +13.3% |
| 1989 | 29.30 million | -20.4% |
| 1990 | 25.94 million | -11.5% |
| 1991 | 28.47 million | +9.8% |
| 1992 | 34.75 million | +22.1% |
| 1993 | 40.56 million | +16.7% |
| 1994 | 84.00 million | +107.1% |
| 1995 | 86.88 million | +3.4% |
| 1996 | 94.90 million | +9.2% |
| 1997 | 88.58 million | -6.7% |
| 1998 | 92.49 million | +4.4% |
| 1999 | 97.18 million | +5.1% |
| 2000 | 91.73 million | -5.6% |
| 2001 | 82.09 million | -10.5% |
| 2002 | 73.39 million | -10.6% |
| 2003 | 72.77 million | -0.8% |
| 2004 | 57.05 million | -21.6% |
| 2005 | 41.40 million | -27.4% |
| 2006 | 38.01 million | -8.2% |
| 2007 | 29.15 million | -23.3% |
| 2008 | 19.09 million | -34.5% |
| 2009 | 19.85 million | +4.0% |
| 2010 | 18.40 million | -7.3% |
| 2011 | 16.13 million | -12.4% |
| 2012 | 15.51 million | -3.9% |
| 2013 | 13.99 million | -9.8% |
| 2014 | 12.49 million | -10.7% |
| 2015 | 19.85 million | +58.8% |
| 2016 | 20.64 million | +4.0% |
| 2017 | 21.76 million | +5.4% |
| 2018 | 16.10 million | -26.0% |
| 2019 | 15.23 million | -5.4% |
| 2020 | 13.46 million | -11.7% |
| 2021 | 12.88 million | -4.3% |
| 2022 | 13.97 million | +8.4% |
| 2023 | 14.66 million | +4.9% |
| 2024 | 15.01 million | +2.4% |
Nicaragua compared with similar countries
- Nicaragua's 15.01 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 26.17 million, 57% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Nicaragua's 15.01 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 1.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 fossil plus land use in Nicaragua changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | +107.1% | 40.56 million | 84.00 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 7.11 million | 3.16 million | 9.32 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 8.75 million | 7.03 million | 11.03 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 11.01 million | 8.76 million | 12.93 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 11.66 million | 9.62 million | 14.26 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 12.99 million | 11.17 million | 16.33 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 29.84 million | 18.74 million | 34.11 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 32.88 million | 31.31 million | 35.81 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 49.08 million | 38.29 million | 53.82 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 66.44 million | 54.15 million | 77.98 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 29.85 million | 16.46 million | 56.38 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 18.45 million | 15.56 million | 24.19 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 30.66 million | 23.27 million | 36.82 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 67.38 million | 25.94 million | 97.18 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 52.45 million | 19.09 million | 91.73 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.01 million | 12.49 million | 21.76 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.00 million | 12.88 million | 15.01 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Nicaragua
More climate change data for Nicaragua
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 98.12 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,149 kt (2023)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,593 kt (2023)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9,557 kt (2023)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 9.78 kt (2023)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 341.31 kt (2023)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 485.08 kt (2023)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 394.21 kt (2023)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 90.87 kt (2023)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.49 kt (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Nicaragua?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Nicaragua was 15.01 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Nicaragua?
- The highest recorded value was 97.18 million in 1999.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Nicaragua?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.16 million in 1870.
- How does Nicaragua rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Nicaragua ranks 115th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Nicaragua?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nicaragua data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 155 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).