Co2 fossil plus land use in Peru
Peru: Co2 fossil plus land use was 86.93 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
86.93 million
Change on year
up 4.5%
World rank
50th
of 194 countries
All-time high
158.86 million
in 2003
All-time low
7.16 million
in 1857
Years of data
169
1856–2024
Co2 fossil plus land use in Peru, 1856–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Peru recorded 86.93 million for co2 fossil plus land use in 2024.
That represents a change of up 4.5% on the previous year and down 29.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Peru peaked at 158.86 million in 2003 and was at its lowest, 7.16 million, in 1857.
Peru ranks 50th of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Peru, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 7.38 million | — |
| 1857 | 7.16 million | -2.9% |
| 1858 | 7.18 million | +0.3% |
| 1859 | 7.74 million | +7.7% |
| 1860 | 8.03 million | +3.8% |
| 1861 | 7.61 million | -5.2% |
| 1862 | 7.65 million | +0.6% |
| 1863 | 7.68 million | +0.4% |
| 1864 | 7.70 million | +0.2% |
| 1865 | 7.51 million | -2.4% |
| 1866 | 8.13 million | +8.3% |
| 1867 | 7.92 million | -2.7% |
| 1868 | 8.21 million | +3.7% |
| 1869 | 7.81 million | -4.8% |
| 1870 | 8.81 million | +12.7% |
| 1871 | 10.43 million | +18.5% |
| 1872 | 11.18 million | +7.1% |
| 1873 | 11.18 million | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 11.99 million | +7.2% |
| 1875 | 11.99 million | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 12.17 million | +1.5% |
| 1877 | 12.49 million | +2.7% |
| 1878 | 12.64 million | +1.2% |
| 1879 | 12.39 million | -2.0% |
| 1880 | 15.82 million | +27.7% |
| 1881 | 18.26 million | +15.5% |
| 1882 | 20.31 million | +11.2% |
| 1883 | 21.59 million | +6.3% |
| 1884 | 22.10 million | +2.3% |
| 1885 | 23.91 million | +8.2% |
| 1886 | 22.99 million | -3.8% |
| 1887 | 25.30 million | +10.0% |
| 1888 | 24.98 million | -1.2% |
| 1889 | 25.00 million | +0.1% |
| 1890 | 25.11 million | +0.4% |
| 1891 | 23.23 million | -7.5% |
| 1892 | 23.54 million | +1.3% |
| 1893 | 22.52 million | -4.3% |
| 1894 | 22.98 million | +2.0% |
| 1895 | 21.86 million | -4.9% |
| 1896 | 21.30 million | -2.5% |
| 1897 | 21.24 million | -0.3% |
| 1898 | 21.45 million | +1.0% |
| 1899 | 21.85 million | +1.8% |
| 1900 | 20.44 million | -6.4% |
| 1901 | 18.84 million | -7.8% |
| 1902 | 18.02 million | -4.3% |
| 1903 | 17.53 million | -2.7% |
| 1904 | 17.42 million | -0.6% |
| 1905 | 16.32 million | -6.3% |
| 1906 | 16.64 million | +1.9% |
| 1907 | 16.91 million | +1.7% |
| 1908 | 16.99 million | +0.5% |
| 1909 | 17.30 million | +1.8% |
| 1910 | 17.68 million | +2.2% |
| 1911 | 17.73 million | +0.2% |
| 1912 | 17.89 million | +0.9% |
| 1913 | 17.64 million | -1.4% |
| 1914 | 17.28 million | -2.1% |
| 1915 | 17.37 million | +0.5% |
| 1916 | 17.00 million | -2.1% |
| 1917 | 17.06 million | +0.4% |
| 1918 | 17.13 million | +0.4% |
| 1919 | 16.95 million | -1.0% |
| 1920 | 18.76 million | +10.7% |
| 1921 | 20.17 million | +7.5% |
| 1922 | 20.56 million | +1.9% |
| 1923 | 21.19 million | +3.1% |
| 1924 | 21.66 million | +2.2% |
| 1925 | 23.65 million | +9.2% |
| 1926 | 23.78 million | +0.6% |
| 1927 | 23.27 million | -2.2% |
| 1928 | 24.47 million | +5.1% |
| 1929 | 26.07 million | +6.6% |
| 1930 | 28.71 million | +10.1% |
| 1931 | 31.62 million | +10.2% |
| 1932 | 32.18 million | +1.8% |
| 1933 | 36.41 million | +13.1% |
| 1934 | 36.88 million | +1.3% |
| 1935 | 37.46 million | +1.6% |
| 1936 | 36.07 million | -3.7% |
| 1937 | 40.35 million | +11.9% |
| 1938 | 38.58 million | -4.4% |
| 1939 | 36.11 million | -6.4% |
| 1940 | 31.75 million | -12.1% |
| 1941 | 26.55 million | -16.4% |
| 1942 | 25.49 million | -4.0% |
| 1943 | 24.19 million | -5.1% |
| 1944 | 23.70 million | -2.0% |
| 1945 | 21.93 million | -7.5% |
| 1946 | 20.47 million | -6.6% |
| 1947 | 20.49 million | +0.1% |
| 1948 | 20.36 million | -0.7% |
| 1949 | 20.72 million | +1.8% |
| 1950 | 24.35 million | +17.5% |
| 1951 | 28.16 million | +15.7% |
| 1952 | 30.79 million | +9.3% |
| 1953 | 36.65 million | +19.0% |
| 1954 | 41.48 million | +13.2% |
| 1955 | 40.07 million | -3.4% |
| 1956 | 42.03 million | +4.9% |
| 1957 | 46.97 million | +11.8% |
| 1958 | 53.12 million | +13.1% |
| 1959 | 57.80 million | +8.8% |
| 1960 | 65.83 million | +13.9% |
| 1961 | 59.38 million | -9.8% |
| 1962 | 106.31 million | +79.0% |
| 1963 | 93.53 million | -12.0% |
| 1964 | 93.00 million | -0.6% |
| 1965 | 67.27 million | -27.7% |
| 1966 | 56.37 million | -16.2% |
| 1967 | 53.54 million | -5.0% |
| 1968 | 53.49 million | -0.1% |
| 1969 | 58.47 million | +9.3% |
| 1970 | 66.85 million | +14.3% |
| 1971 | 114.83 million | +71.8% |
| 1972 | 124.37 million | +8.3% |
| 1973 | 129.36 million | +4.0% |
| 1974 | 111.87 million | -13.5% |
| 1975 | 104.01 million | -7.0% |
| 1976 | 106.93 million | +2.8% |
| 1977 | 102.67 million | -4.0% |
| 1978 | 99.52 million | -3.1% |
| 1979 | 96.60 million | -2.9% |
| 1980 | 93.88 million | -2.8% |
| 1981 | 93.81 million | -0.1% |
| 1982 | 89.53 million | -4.6% |
| 1983 | 83.37 million | -6.9% |
| 1984 | 80.31 million | -3.7% |
| 1985 | 77.81 million | -3.1% |
| 1986 | 80.05 million | +2.9% |
| 1987 | 83.75 million | +4.6% |
| 1988 | 83.31 million | -0.5% |
| 1989 | 77.91 million | -6.5% |
| 1990 | 70.33 million | -9.7% |
| 1991 | 74.71 million | +6.2% |
| 1992 | 91.30 million | +22.2% |
| 1993 | 101.41 million | +11.1% |
| 1994 | 85.92 million | -15.3% |
| 1995 | 79.61 million | -7.3% |
| 1996 | 72.79 million | -8.6% |
| 1997 | 77.05 million | +5.9% |
| 1998 | 105.71 million | +37.2% |
| 1999 | 98.69 million | -6.6% |
| 2000 | 104.80 million | +6.2% |
| 2001 | 93.84 million | -10.5% |
| 2002 | 79.45 million | -15.3% |
| 2003 | 158.86 million | +100.0% |
| 2004 | 120.01 million | -24.5% |
| 2005 | 108.24 million | -9.8% |
| 2006 | 91.59 million | -15.4% |
| 2007 | 94.52 million | +3.2% |
| 2008 | 82.98 million | -12.2% |
| 2009 | 81.90 million | -1.3% |
| 2010 | 81.29 million | -0.7% |
| 2011 | 80.66 million | -0.8% |
| 2012 | 79.85 million | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 81.73 million | +2.3% |
| 2014 | 122.51 million | +49.9% |
| 2015 | 88.52 million | -27.7% |
| 2016 | 93.59 million | +5.7% |
| 2017 | 83.22 million | -11.1% |
| 2018 | 80.80 million | -2.9% |
| 2019 | 83.47 million | +3.3% |
| 2020 | 65.98 million | -21.0% |
| 2021 | 77.57 million | +17.6% |
| 2022 | 81.58 million | +5.2% |
| 2023 | 83.20 million | +2.0% |
| 2024 | 86.93 million | +4.5% |
Peru compared with similar countries
- Peru's 86.93 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.44 million, 3.6× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Peru's 86.93 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 5.9× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 fossil plus land use in Peru changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | +100.0% | 79.45 million | 158.86 million |
| 1962 | +79.0% | 59.38 million | 106.31 million |
| 1971 | +71.8% | 66.85 million | 114.83 million |
| 2014 | +49.9% | 81.73 million | 122.51 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 7.36 million | 7.16 million | 7.74 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 7.82 million | 7.51 million | 8.21 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 11.53 million | 8.81 million | 12.64 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 22.03 million | 15.82 million | 25.30 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 22.51 million | 21.24 million | 25.11 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 17.64 million | 16.32 million | 20.44 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 17.37 million | 16.95 million | 17.89 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 22.36 million | 18.76 million | 26.07 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 35.44 million | 28.71 million | 40.35 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 23.57 million | 20.36 million | 31.75 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 40.14 million | 24.35 million | 57.80 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 70.72 million | 53.49 million | 106.31 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 105.70 million | 66.85 million | 129.36 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 84.37 million | 77.81 million | 93.88 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 85.75 million | 70.33 million | 105.71 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 101.62 million | 79.45 million | 158.86 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 87.56 million | 79.85 million | 122.51 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 79.05 million | 65.98 million | 86.93 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Peru
More climate change data for Peru
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 397.03 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 25,757 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 6,560 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 19,197 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 24.76 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 685.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 6,265 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,780 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,484 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 10.49 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Peru?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Peru was 86.93 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Peru?
- The highest recorded value was 158.86 million in 2003.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Peru?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.16 million in 1857.
- How does Peru rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Peru ranks 50th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Peru?
- Over the last ten years it is down 29.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Peru data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).