Co2 fossil plus land use in Uruguay
Uruguay: Co2 fossil plus land use was 8.51 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
8.51 million
Change on year
up 1.6%
World rank
133rd
of 194 countries
All-time high
39.64 million
in 2008
All-time low
-3.03 million
in 1969
Years of data
169
1856–2024
Co2 fossil plus land use in Uruguay, 1856–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 fossil plus land use in Uruguay is 8.51 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.6% on the previous year and down 54.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Uruguay peaked at 39.64 million in 2008 and was at its lowest, -3.03 million, in 1969.
Uruguay ranks 133rd of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 2.49 million | — |
| 1857 | 2.61 million | +5.0% |
| 1858 | 2.77 million | +6.0% |
| 1859 | 2.81 million | +1.3% |
| 1860 | 2.89 million | +3.0% |
| 1861 | 2.98 million | +3.1% |
| 1862 | 3.01 million | +1.1% |
| 1863 | 3.10 million | +2.9% |
| 1864 | 3.13 million | +0.8% |
| 1865 | 3.22 million | +3.1% |
| 1866 | 3.40 million | +5.4% |
| 1867 | 3.44 million | +1.4% |
| 1868 | 3.62 million | +5.1% |
| 1869 | 3.61 million | -0.3% |
| 1870 | 3.50 million | -2.9% |
| 1871 | 3.53 million | +0.6% |
| 1872 | 3.69 million | +4.8% |
| 1873 | 3.69 million | -0.2% |
| 1874 | 3.94 million | +6.8% |
| 1875 | 3.82 million | -3.0% |
| 1876 | 3.86 million | +1.2% |
| 1877 | 3.95 million | +2.2% |
| 1878 | 3.95 million | +0.1% |
| 1879 | 3.95 million | -0.2% |
| 1880 | 3.91 million | -0.9% |
| 1881 | 4.52 million | +15.7% |
| 1882 | 4.91 million | +8.7% |
| 1883 | 5.37 million | +9.2% |
| 1884 | 5.75 million | +7.1% |
| 1885 | 6.08 million | +5.7% |
| 1886 | 6.06 million | -0.3% |
| 1887 | 6.41 million | +5.9% |
| 1888 | 6.64 million | +3.6% |
| 1889 | 7.24 million | +9.0% |
| 1890 | 7.00 million | -3.4% |
| 1891 | 7.04 million | +0.6% |
| 1892 | 7.07 million | +0.4% |
| 1893 | 7.27 million | +2.8% |
| 1894 | 7.52 million | +3.6% |
| 1895 | 7.59 million | +0.8% |
| 1896 | 7.68 million | +1.3% |
| 1897 | 7.57 million | -1.4% |
| 1898 | 7.94 million | +4.9% |
| 1899 | 8.00 million | +0.7% |
| 1900 | 8.46 million | +5.8% |
| 1901 | 7.96 million | -5.9% |
| 1902 | 8.01 million | +0.7% |
| 1903 | 7.45 million | -6.9% |
| 1904 | 6.74 million | -9.6% |
| 1905 | 6.42 million | -4.7% |
| 1906 | 7.02 million | +9.3% |
| 1907 | 7.39 million | +5.4% |
| 1908 | 7.63 million | +3.1% |
| 1909 | 7.47 million | -2.0% |
| 1910 | 7.79 million | +4.3% |
| 1911 | 7.92 million | +1.6% |
| 1912 | 7.92 million | +0.1% |
| 1913 | 7.82 million | -1.3% |
| 1914 | 7.43 million | -5.0% |
| 1915 | 7.08 million | -4.7% |
| 1916 | 6.71 million | -5.3% |
| 1917 | 6.71 million | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 6.98 million | +4.0% |
| 1919 | 7.03 million | +0.8% |
| 1920 | 7.06 million | +0.3% |
| 1921 | 6.88 million | -2.5% |
| 1922 | 7.35 million | +6.9% |
| 1923 | 7.17 million | -2.4% |
| 1924 | 7.31 million | +1.9% |
| 1925 | 6.97 million | -4.7% |
| 1926 | 6.90 million | -1.0% |
| 1927 | 6.84 million | -0.9% |
| 1928 | 6.71 million | -1.9% |
| 1929 | 6.96 million | +3.7% |
| 1930 | 6.80 million | -2.2% |
| 1931 | 6.88 million | +1.0% |
| 1932 | 6.70 million | -2.5% |
| 1933 | 6.73 million | +0.4% |
| 1934 | 6.65 million | -1.1% |
| 1935 | 6.73 million | +1.1% |
| 1936 | 6.78 million | +0.7% |
| 1937 | 6.67 million | -1.6% |
| 1938 | 6.59 million | -1.1% |
| 1939 | 6.70 million | +1.6% |
| 1940 | 6.80 million | +1.6% |
| 1941 | 6.56 million | -3.5% |
| 1942 | 6.29 million | -4.2% |
| 1943 | 6.49 million | +3.3% |
| 1944 | 6.36 million | -2.1% |
| 1945 | 6.48 million | +2.0% |
| 1946 | 6.12 million | -5.5% |
| 1947 | 6.02 million | -1.7% |
| 1948 | 6.03 million | +0.2% |
| 1949 | 6.02 million | -0.2% |
| 1950 | 8.11 million | +34.7% |
| 1951 | 7.98 million | -1.6% |
| 1952 | 8.32 million | +4.3% |
| 1953 | 8.52 million | +2.4% |
| 1954 | 8.76 million | +2.8% |
| 1955 | 9.18 million | +4.9% |
| 1956 | 9.22 million | +0.4% |
| 1957 | 9.65 million | +4.6% |
| 1958 | 9.18 million | -4.9% |
| 1959 | 9.33 million | +1.7% |
| 1960 | 9.47 million | +1.4% |
| 1961 | 6.84 million | -27.7% |
| 1962 | 4.54 million | -33.6% |
| 1963 | 3.12 million | -31.3% |
| 1964 | 2.20 million | -29.4% |
| 1965 | 2.14 million | -2.7% |
| 1966 | 681,837 | -68.2% |
| 1967 | -564,081 | -182.7% |
| 1968 | -1.53 million | +172.0% |
| 1969 | -3.03 million | +97.6% |
| 1970 | -1.73 million | -43.0% |
| 1971 | -1.28 million | -25.6% |
| 1972 | -795,751 | -38.1% |
| 1973 | -988,064 | +24.2% |
| 1974 | -989,280 | +0.1% |
| 1975 | -700,027 | -29.2% |
| 1976 | -766,830 | +9.5% |
| 1977 | -1.00 million | +31.0% |
| 1978 | -988,470 | -1.6% |
| 1979 | -441,488 | -55.3% |
| 1980 | -418,416 | -5.2% |
| 1981 | -537,198 | +28.4% |
| 1982 | -763,942 | +42.2% |
| 1983 | -1.58 million | +106.7% |
| 1984 | -1.76 million | +11.2% |
| 1985 | -1.77 million | +0.7% |
| 1986 | -1.65 million | -6.8% |
| 1987 | -1.15 million | -30.3% |
| 1988 | 153,236 | -113.3% |
| 1989 | -1.62 million | -1154.2% |
| 1990 | 309,198 | -119.1% |
| 1991 | 1.77 million | +471.8% |
| 1992 | 2.91 million | +64.6% |
| 1993 | 2.65 million | -8.8% |
| 1994 | 2.59 million | -2.3% |
| 1995 | 3.41 million | +31.4% |
| 1996 | 4.57 million | +34.2% |
| 1997 | 4.93 million | +7.7% |
| 1998 | 5.16 million | +4.7% |
| 1999 | 6.44 million | +24.9% |
| 2000 | 4.66 million | -27.7% |
| 2001 | 4.78 million | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 4.15 million | -13.1% |
| 2003 | 4.35 million | +4.9% |
| 2004 | 5.21 million | +19.6% |
| 2005 | 6.65 million | +27.6% |
| 2006 | 13.35 million | +100.8% |
| 2007 | 28.69 million | +115.0% |
| 2008 | 39.64 million | +38.2% |
| 2009 | 23.89 million | -39.7% |
| 2010 | 33.68 million | +41.0% |
| 2011 | 20.22 million | -40.0% |
| 2012 | 24.89 million | +23.1% |
| 2013 | 24.43 million | -1.9% |
| 2014 | 18.72 million | -23.3% |
| 2015 | 10.94 million | -41.6% |
| 2016 | 9.12 million | -16.6% |
| 2017 | 8.63 million | -5.4% |
| 2018 | 8.89 million | +2.9% |
| 2019 | 8.36 million | -6.0% |
| 2020 | 7.97 million | -4.6% |
| 2021 | 9.06 million | +13.7% |
| 2022 | 8.47 million | -6.6% |
| 2023 | 8.37 million | -1.1% |
| 2024 | 8.51 million | +1.6% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 8.51 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 23% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 8.51 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 58% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 fossil plus land use in Uruguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | -1154.2% | 153,236 | -1.62 million |
| 1991 | +471.8% | 309,198 | 1.77 million |
| 1967 | -182.7% | 681,837 | -564,081 |
| 1968 | -172.0% | -564,081 | -1.53 million |
| 1990 | +119.1% | -1.62 million | 309,198 |
| 2007 | +115.0% | 13.35 million | 28.69 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 2.67 million | 2.49 million | 2.81 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 3.24 million | 2.89 million | 3.62 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 3.79 million | 3.50 million | 3.95 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 5.69 million | 3.91 million | 7.24 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 7.47 million | 7.00 million | 8.00 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 7.46 million | 6.42 million | 8.46 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 7.34 million | 6.71 million | 7.92 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 7.01 million | 6.71 million | 7.35 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 6.72 million | 6.59 million | 6.88 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 6.32 million | 6.02 million | 6.80 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 8.83 million | 7.98 million | 9.65 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.39 million | -3.03 million | 9.47 million | 10 |
| 1970s | -968,723 | -1.73 million | -441,488 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.11 million | -1.77 million | 153,236 | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.47 million | 309,198 | 6.44 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.54 million | 4.15 million | 39.64 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 16.79 million | 8.36 million | 33.68 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 8.48 million | 7.97 million | 9.06 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More climate change data for Uruguay
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 282.29 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 30,988 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 6,806 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 24,182 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 25.68 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 863.65 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,857 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,098 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,759 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 7.92 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Uruguay?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Uruguay was 8.51 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 39.64 million in 2008.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.03 million in 1969.
- How does Uruguay rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Uruguay ranks 133rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 54.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).