Co2 fossil plus land use in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Co2 fossil plus land use was 11.95 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Co2 fossil plus land use in Zimbabwe, 1903–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 fossil plus land use in Zimbabwe is 11.95 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.5% on the previous year and up 23.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Zimbabwe peaked at 79.21 million in 1999 and was at its lowest, 3.00 million, in 1903.
That places Zimbabwe 120th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1903 | 3.00 million | — |
| 1904 | 3.15 million | +5.3% |
| 1905 | 3.31 million | +5.0% |
| 1906 | 3.39 million | +2.4% |
| 1907 | 3.46 million | +1.9% |
| 1908 | 3.64 million | +5.2% |
| 1909 | 3.68 million | +1.3% |
| 1910 | 4.04 million | +9.7% |
| 1911 | 4.27 million | +5.6% |
| 1912 | 4.43 million | +3.7% |
| 1913 | 4.54 million | +2.6% |
| 1914 | 4.88 million | +7.4% |
| 1915 | 5.06 million | +3.7% |
| 1916 | 5.28 million | +4.4% |
| 1917 | 5.56 million | +5.3% |
| 1918 | 5.37 million | -3.5% |
| 1919 | 5.44 million | +1.4% |
| 1920 | 6.65 million | +22.2% |
| 1921 | 7.32 million | +10.1% |
| 1922 | 7.61 million | +4.0% |
| 1923 | 8.12 million | +6.7% |
| 1924 | 8.44 million | +4.0% |
| 1925 | 8.84 million | +4.8% |
| 1926 | 9.47 million | +7.1% |
| 1927 | 9.63 million | +1.7% |
| 1928 | 10.21 million | +6.1% |
| 1929 | 10.10 million | -1.1% |
| 1930 | 10.51 million | +4.1% |
| 1931 | 9.98 million | -5.1% |
| 1932 | 9.87 million | -1.1% |
| 1933 | 10.06 million | +1.9% |
| 1934 | 10.47 million | +4.1% |
| 1935 | 10.81 million | +3.3% |
| 1936 | 10.88 million | +0.6% |
| 1937 | 11.89 million | +9.3% |
| 1938 | 11.99 million | +0.8% |
| 1939 | 12.08 million | +0.8% |
| 1940 | 14.80 million | +22.5% |
| 1941 | 16.69 million | +12.8% |
| 1942 | 17.92 million | +7.4% |
| 1943 | 18.96 million | +5.8% |
| 1944 | 19.59 million | +3.3% |
| 1945 | 19.54 million | -0.3% |
| 1946 | 19.55 million | +0.1% |
| 1947 | 19.49 million | -0.3% |
| 1948 | 20.11 million | +3.2% |
| 1949 | 20.94 million | +4.2% |
| 1950 | 18.79 million | -10.3% |
| 1951 | 20.02 million | +6.5% |
| 1952 | 20.46 million | +2.2% |
| 1953 | 21.06 million | +2.9% |
| 1954 | 22.26 million | +5.7% |
| 1955 | 22.99 million | +3.3% |
| 1956 | 23.91 million | +4.0% |
| 1957 | 24.74 million | +3.5% |
| 1958 | 24.69 million | -0.2% |
| 1959 | 25.46 million | +3.1% |
| 1960 | 26.22 million | +3.0% |
| 1961 | 23.33 million | -11.0% |
| 1962 | 24.20 million | +3.7% |
| 1963 | 22.00 million | -9.1% |
| 1964 | 21.00 million | -4.6% |
| 1965 | 16.41 million | -21.8% |
| 1966 | 20.96 million | +27.7% |
| 1967 | 18.55 million | -11.5% |
| 1968 | 24.29 million | +30.9% |
| 1969 | 25.57 million | +5.2% |
| 1970 | 29.19 million | +14.2% |
| 1971 | 32.91 million | +12.8% |
| 1972 | 30.06 million | -8.7% |
| 1973 | 33.01 million | +9.8% |
| 1974 | 30.76 million | -6.8% |
| 1975 | 28.00 million | -9.0% |
| 1976 | 32.95 million | +17.7% |
| 1977 | 27.50 million | -16.5% |
| 1978 | 26.28 million | -4.4% |
| 1979 | 28.68 million | +9.1% |
| 1980 | 34.98 million | +22.0% |
| 1981 | 34.90 million | -0.2% |
| 1982 | 42.48 million | +21.7% |
| 1983 | 38.35 million | -9.7% |
| 1984 | 33.88 million | -11.7% |
| 1985 | 38.04 million | +12.3% |
| 1986 | 28.25 million | -25.7% |
| 1987 | 35.26 million | +24.8% |
| 1988 | 55.61 million | +57.7% |
| 1989 | 57.81 million | +4.0% |
| 1990 | 55.18 million | -4.6% |
| 1991 | 39.30 million | -28.8% |
| 1992 | 49.97 million | +27.2% |
| 1993 | 67.48 million | +35.0% |
| 1994 | 61.34 million | -9.1% |
| 1995 | 67.02 million | +9.3% |
| 1996 | 51.37 million | -23.3% |
| 1997 | 49.00 million | -4.6% |
| 1998 | 65.69 million | +34.1% |
| 1999 | 79.21 million | +20.6% |
| 2000 | 57.61 million | -27.3% |
| 2001 | 54.95 million | -4.6% |
| 2002 | 51.11 million | -7.0% |
| 2003 | 58.34 million | +14.1% |
| 2004 | 53.77 million | -7.8% |
| 2005 | 59.66 million | +10.9% |
| 2006 | 45.49 million | -23.8% |
| 2007 | 57.20 million | +25.7% |
| 2008 | 36.58 million | -36.1% |
| 2009 | 30.98 million | -15.3% |
| 2010 | 43.09 million | +39.1% |
| 2011 | 31.27 million | -27.4% |
| 2012 | 20.26 million | -35.2% |
| 2013 | 11.01 million | -45.7% |
| 2014 | 9.67 million | -12.1% |
| 2015 | 17.87 million | +84.8% |
| 2016 | 10.81 million | -39.5% |
| 2017 | 15.40 million | +42.5% |
| 2018 | 10.13 million | -34.2% |
| 2019 | 16.60 million | +63.8% |
| 2020 | 7.90 million | -52.4% |
| 2021 | 12.44 million | +57.6% |
| 2022 | 11.89 million | -4.4% |
| 2023 | 12.13 million | +2.0% |
| 2024 | 11.95 million | -1.5% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 11.95 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 26.17 million, 46% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 11.95 million is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 14.74 million, 81% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 fossil plus land use in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | +84.8% | 9.67 million | 17.87 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 3.38 million | 3.00 million | 3.68 million | 7 |
| 1910s | 4.89 million | 4.04 million | 5.56 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 8.64 million | 6.65 million | 10.21 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 10.85 million | 9.87 million | 12.08 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 18.76 million | 14.80 million | 20.94 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 22.44 million | 18.79 million | 25.46 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 22.25 million | 16.41 million | 26.22 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 29.93 million | 26.28 million | 33.01 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 39.96 million | 28.25 million | 57.81 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 58.56 million | 39.30 million | 79.21 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 50.57 million | 30.98 million | 59.66 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 18.61 million | 9.67 million | 43.09 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 11.26 million | 7.90 million | 12.44 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More climate change data for Zimbabwe
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 178.46 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 17,716 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,805 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11,912 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 21.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 425.42 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,483 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,345 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 137.94 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.08 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Zimbabwe?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Zimbabwe was 11.95 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 79.21 million in 1999.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.00 million in 1903.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Zimbabwe ranks 120th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 122 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).