Co2 income level in Ecuador
Ecuador: Co2 income level was 45.98 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Co2 income level in Ecuador, 1892–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 45.98 million for co2 income level in 2024. That is the highest value across all 133 years on record.
The figure is up 3.1% on the previous year and up 5.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 income level in Ecuador peaked at 45.98 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1898.
Ecuador ranks 58th of 215 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 income level in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1892 | 85 | — |
| 1893 | 8 | -90.6% |
| 1894 | 13 | +62.5% |
| 1895 | 3,403 | +26076.9% |
| 1896 | 3 | -99.9% |
| 1897 | 810 | +26900.0% |
| 1898 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1899 | 1,967 | — |
| 1900 | 3 | -99.8% |
| 1901 | 18 | +500.0% |
| 1902 | 49 | +172.2% |
| 1903 | 2,567 | +5138.8% |
| 1904 | 4,296 | +67.4% |
| 1905 | 37,097 | +763.5% |
| 1906 | 12,819 | -65.4% |
| 1907 | 492 | -96.2% |
| 1908 | 7,818 | +1489.0% |
| 1909 | 35,605 | +355.4% |
| 1910 | 56,013 | +57.3% |
| 1911 | 51,234 | -8.5% |
| 1912 | 46,856 | -8.5% |
| 1913 | 53,256 | +13.7% |
| 1914 | 29,408 | -44.8% |
| 1915 | 24,476 | -16.8% |
| 1916 | 49,667 | +102.9% |
| 1917 | 62,194 | +25.2% |
| 1918 | 31,470 | -49.4% |
| 1919 | 33,486 | +6.4% |
| 1920 | 39,239 | +17.2% |
| 1921 | 36,805 | -6.2% |
| 1922 | 36,454 | -1.0% |
| 1923 | 42,188 | +15.7% |
| 1924 | 52,137 | +23.6% |
| 1925 | 72,507 | +39.1% |
| 1926 | 112,844 | +55.6% |
| 1927 | 235,360 | +108.6% |
| 1928 | 474,280 | +101.5% |
| 1929 | 601,363 | +26.8% |
| 1930 | 678,153 | +12.8% |
| 1931 | 766,925 | +13.1% |
| 1932 | 711,965 | -7.2% |
| 1933 | 726,621 | +2.1% |
| 1934 | 733,949 | +1.0% |
| 1935 | 785,186 | +7.0% |
| 1936 | 876,845 | +11.7% |
| 1937 | 975,773 | +11.3% |
| 1938 | 1.03 million | +5.6% |
| 1939 | 1.07 million | +3.8% |
| 1940 | 1.09 million | +1.7% |
| 1941 | 729,459 | -33.0% |
| 1942 | 1.05 million | +44.2% |
| 1943 | 1.06 million | +0.3% |
| 1944 | 1.33 million | +25.7% |
| 1945 | 1.23 million | -7.5% |
| 1946 | 1.10 million | -10.1% |
| 1947 | 1.16 million | +5.0% |
| 1948 | 1.29 million | +11.1% |
| 1949 | 1.30 million | +1.2% |
| 1950 | 740,272 | -43.1% |
| 1951 | 703,543 | -5.0% |
| 1952 | 894,808 | +27.2% |
| 1953 | 820,762 | -8.3% |
| 1954 | 963,246 | +17.4% |
| 1955 | 1.20 million | +24.3% |
| 1956 | 1.30 million | +8.3% |
| 1957 | 1.13 million | -12.7% |
| 1958 | 1.32 million | +16.8% |
| 1959 | 1.29 million | -2.2% |
| 1960 | 1.76 million | +36.3% |
| 1961 | 1.64 million | -6.7% |
| 1962 | 1.56 million | -4.9% |
| 1963 | 1.79 million | +14.8% |
| 1964 | 2.14 million | +19.4% |
| 1965 | 2.27 million | +6.2% |
| 1966 | 2.42 million | +6.3% |
| 1967 | 2.59 million | +7.1% |
| 1968 | 3.11 million | +20.2% |
| 1969 | 3.59 million | +15.3% |
| 1970 | 4.28 million | +19.2% |
| 1971 | 4.22 million | -1.4% |
| 1972 | 4.59 million | +8.8% |
| 1973 | 5.26 million | +14.5% |
| 1974 | 6.08 million | +15.7% |
| 1975 | 7.35 million | +20.9% |
| 1976 | 8.10 million | +10.1% |
| 1977 | 7.47 million | -7.7% |
| 1978 | 10.41 million | +39.3% |
| 1979 | 12.15 million | +16.7% |
| 1980 | 13.42 million | +10.5% |
| 1981 | 16.66 million | +24.2% |
| 1982 | 19.25 million | +15.5% |
| 1983 | 19.52 million | +1.4% |
| 1984 | 21.21 million | +8.7% |
| 1985 | 19.38 million | -8.6% |
| 1986 | 15.22 million | -21.4% |
| 1987 | 15.05 million | -1.1% |
| 1988 | 17.20 million | +14.3% |
| 1989 | 20.19 million | +17.4% |
| 1990 | 16.50 million | -18.3% |
| 1991 | 16.20 million | -1.8% |
| 1992 | 22.00 million | +35.8% |
| 1993 | 24.12 million | +9.7% |
| 1994 | 14.34 million | -40.6% |
| 1995 | 23.53 million | +64.1% |
| 1996 | 25.34 million | +7.7% |
| 1997 | 19.46 million | -23.2% |
| 1998 | 23.12 million | +18.8% |
| 1999 | 22.00 million | -4.8% |
| 2000 | 20.95 million | -4.8% |
| 2001 | 23.44 million | +11.9% |
| 2002 | 24.86 million | +6.1% |
| 2003 | 27.11 million | +9.1% |
| 2004 | 29.31 million | +8.1% |
| 2005 | 30.65 million | +4.6% |
| 2006 | 29.78 million | -2.8% |
| 2007 | 34.39 million | +15.5% |
| 2008 | 30.49 million | -11.4% |
| 2009 | 33.81 million | +10.9% |
| 2010 | 36.47 million | +7.9% |
| 2011 | 38.48 million | +5.5% |
| 2012 | 37.49 million | -2.6% |
| 2013 | 39.68 million | +5.8% |
| 2014 | 43.76 million | +10.3% |
| 2015 | 41.30 million | -5.6% |
| 2016 | 39.37 million | -4.7% |
| 2017 | 39.20 million | -0.5% |
| 2018 | 38.45 million | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 40.08 million | +4.2% |
| 2020 | 32.47 million | -19.0% |
| 2021 | 38.19 million | +17.6% |
| 2022 | 42.07 million | +10.2% |
| 2023 | 44.60 million | +6.0% |
| 2024 | 45.98 million | +3.1% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 45.98 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 20.35 million, 2.3× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 45.98 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 7.95 million, 5.8× the median. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 income level in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1897 | +26900.0% | 3 | 810 |
| 1895 | +26076.9% | 13 | 3,403 |
| 1903 | +5138.8% | 49 | 2,567 |
| 1908 | +1489.0% | 492 | 7,818 |
| 1905 | +763.5% | 4,296 | 37,097 |
| 1901 | +500.0% | 3 | 18 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 786.12 | 0 | 3,403 | 8 |
| 1900s | 10,076 | 3 | 37,097 | 10 |
| 1910s | 43,806 | 24,476 | 62,194 | 10 |
| 1920s | 170,318 | 36,454 | 601,363 | 10 |
| 1930s | 835,636 | 678,153 | 1.07 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.13 million | 729,459 | 1.33 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.04 million | 703,543 | 1.32 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.29 million | 1.56 million | 3.59 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 6.99 million | 4.22 million | 12.15 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 17.71 million | 13.42 million | 21.21 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 20.66 million | 14.34 million | 25.34 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 28.48 million | 20.95 million | 34.39 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 39.43 million | 36.47 million | 43.76 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 40.66 million | 32.47 million | 45.98 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More climate change data for Ecuador
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 218.44 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,195 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,758 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14,437 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.95 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 515.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,911 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,488 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,423 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.62 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 income level in Ecuador?
- Co2 income level in Ecuador was 45.98 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 income level recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 45.98 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest co2 income level recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1898.
- How does Ecuador rank for co2 income level?
- Ecuador ranks 58th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 income level rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 income level. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 133 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).