Co2 income level in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Co2 income level was 287.01 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
287.01 million
Change on year
up 0.3%
World rank
21st
of 215 countries
All-time high
329.57 million
in 2018
All-time low
973
in 1832
Years of data
173
1830–2024
Co2 income level in Kazakhstan, 1830–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 income level in Kazakhstan stood at 287.01 million.
The figure is up 0.3% on the previous year and down 4.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 income level in Kazakhstan peaked at 329.57 million in 2018 and was at its lowest, 973, in 1832.
That places Kazakhstan 21st out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 income level in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1830 | 1,216 | — |
| 1831 | 1,459 | +20.0% |
| 1832 | 973 | -33.3% |
| 1833 | 1,216 | +25.0% |
| 1850 | 7,537 | +519.8% |
| 1855 | 22,856 | +203.3% |
| 1858 | 32,095 | +40.4% |
| 1859 | 34,040 | +6.1% |
| 1860 | 44,982 | +32.1% |
| 1861 | 57,139 | +27.0% |
| 1862 | 51,547 | -9.8% |
| 1863 | 53,978 | +4.7% |
| 1864 | 60,543 | +12.2% |
| 1865 | 57,868 | -4.4% |
| 1866 | 182,845 | +216.0% |
| 1867 | 209,834 | +14.8% |
| 1868 | 174,578 | -16.8% |
| 1869 | 236,823 | +35.7% |
| 1870 | 257,004 | +8.5% |
| 1871 | 346,967 | +35.0% |
| 1872 | 356,207 | +2.7% |
| 1873 | 334,324 | -6.1% |
| 1874 | 405,808 | +21.4% |
| 1875 | 467,081 | +15.1% |
| 1876 | 579,900 | +24.2% |
| 1877 | 591,814 | +2.1% |
| 1878 | 773,443 | +30.7% |
| 1879 | 793,624 | +2.6% |
| 1880 | 931,001 | +17.3% |
| 1881 | 980,603 | +5.3% |
| 1882 | 1.03 million | +5.3% |
| 1883 | 1.18 million | +13.8% |
| 1884 | 1.19 million | +1.5% |
| 1885 | 1.30 million | +8.9% |
| 1886 | 1.33 million | +2.6% |
| 1887 | 1.41 million | +5.8% |
| 1888 | 1.47 million | +4.3% |
| 1889 | 1.59 million | +8.0% |
| 1890 | 1.80 million | +13.2% |
| 1891 | 1.98 million | +10.1% |
| 1892 | 2.10 million | +5.9% |
| 1893 | 2.46 million | +17.2% |
| 1894 | 2.50 million | +1.8% |
| 1895 | 2.88 million | +14.9% |
| 1896 | 2.93 million | +1.8% |
| 1897 | 3.39 million | +15.6% |
| 1898 | 3.80 million | +12.2% |
| 1899 | 4.41 million | +16.0% |
| 1900 | 4.99 million | +13.3% |
| 1901 | 5.12 million | +2.7% |
| 1902 | 4.95 million | -3.4% |
| 1903 | 4.84 million | -2.2% |
| 1904 | 5.39 million | +11.3% |
| 1905 | 4.81 million | -10.7% |
| 1906 | 5.48 million | +14.1% |
| 1907 | 6.14 million | +12.0% |
| 1908 | 6.18 million | +0.6% |
| 1909 | 6.53 million | +5.6% |
| 1910 | 6.40 million | -1.9% |
| 1911 | 6.63 million | +3.7% |
| 1912 | 7.52 million | +13.3% |
| 1913 | 8.16 million | +8.6% |
| 1914 | 7.37 million | -9.7% |
| 1915 | 6.76 million | -8.2% |
| 1916 | 7.21 million | +6.6% |
| 1917 | 6.63 million | -8.0% |
| 1918 | 2.65 million | -60.1% |
| 1919 | 2.26 million | -14.6% |
| 1920 | 2.06 million | -8.8% |
| 1921 | 2.23 million | +8.4% |
| 1922 | 2.73 million | +22.0% |
| 1923 | 3.01 million | +10.5% |
| 1924 | 3.59 million | +19.1% |
| 1925 | 3.54 million | -1.3% |
| 1926 | 5.13 million | +44.9% |
| 1927 | 6.38 million | +24.3% |
| 1928 | 7.10 million | +11.4% |
| 1929 | 7.65 million | +7.7% |
| 1930 | 10.40 million | +35.9% |
| 1931 | 12.49 million | +20.1% |
| 1932 | 14.07 million | +12.7% |
| 1933 | 15.72 million | +11.7% |
| 1934 | 19.01 million | +21.0% |
| 1935 | 21.53 million | +13.2% |
| 1936 | 24.69 million | +14.7% |
| 1937 | 25.24 million | +2.2% |
| 1938 | 26.64 million | +5.5% |
| 1939 | 26.97 million | +1.2% |
| 1940 | 32.33 million | +19.9% |
| 1941 | 28.41 million | -12.1% |
| 1942 | 15.41 million | -45.7% |
| 1943 | 16.08 million | +4.4% |
| 1944 | 23.32 million | +45.0% |
| 1945 | 24.71 million | +6.0% |
| 1946 | 27.79 million | +12.4% |
| 1947 | 33.47 million | +20.4% |
| 1948 | 35.63 million | +6.5% |
| 1949 | 40.51 million | +13.7% |
| 1950 | 45.17 million | +11.5% |
| 1951 | 48.97 million | +8.4% |
| 1952 | 52.45 million | +7.1% |
| 1953 | 55.50 million | +5.8% |
| 1954 | 60.63 million | +9.2% |
| 1955 | 68.76 million | +13.4% |
| 1956 | 75.38 million | +9.6% |
| 1957 | 82.50 million | +9.4% |
| 1958 | 88.08 million | +6.8% |
| 1959 | 92.63 million | +5.2% |
| 1960 | 96.47 million | +4.1% |
| 1961 | 99.49 million | +3.1% |
| 1962 | 104.42 million | +5.0% |
| 1963 | 111.95 million | +7.2% |
| 1964 | 119.03 million | +6.3% |
| 1965 | 126.27 million | +6.1% |
| 1966 | 133.35 million | +5.6% |
| 1967 | 139.41 million | +4.5% |
| 1968 | 143.29 million | +2.8% |
| 1969 | 149.19 million | +4.1% |
| 1970 | 156.97 million | +5.2% |
| 1971 | 166.44 million | +6.0% |
| 1972 | 175.00 million | +5.1% |
| 1973 | 182.27 million | +4.2% |
| 1974 | 189.07 million | +3.7% |
| 1975 | 198.61 million | +5.0% |
| 1976 | 206.07 million | +3.8% |
| 1977 | 212.88 million | +3.3% |
| 1978 | 219.99 million | +3.3% |
| 1979 | 221.66 million | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 230.26 million | +3.9% |
| 1981 | 225.58 million | -2.0% |
| 1982 | 229.74 million | +1.8% |
| 1983 | 232.79 million | +1.3% |
| 1984 | 234.66 million | +0.8% |
| 1985 | 253.15 million | +7.9% |
| 1986 | 258.13 million | +2.0% |
| 1987 | 256.69 million | -0.6% |
| 1988 | 273.73 million | +6.6% |
| 1989 | 264.61 million | -3.3% |
| 1990 | 267.40 million | +1.1% |
| 1991 | 260.42 million | -2.6% |
| 1992 | 233.52 million | -10.3% |
| 1993 | 207.56 million | -11.1% |
| 1994 | 174.67 million | -15.8% |
| 1995 | 168.47 million | -3.6% |
| 1996 | 154.72 million | -8.2% |
| 1997 | 147.29 million | -4.8% |
| 1998 | 145.62 million | -1.1% |
| 1999 | 118.76 million | -18.4% |
| 2000 | 142.20 million | +19.7% |
| 2001 | 138.04 million | -2.9% |
| 2002 | 156.77 million | +13.6% |
| 2003 | 175.02 million | +11.6% |
| 2004 | 185.48 million | +6.0% |
| 2005 | 198.45 million | +7.0% |
| 2006 | 219.63 million | +10.7% |
| 2007 | 225.71 million | +2.8% |
| 2008 | 226.10 million | +0.2% |
| 2009 | 223.19 million | -1.3% |
| 2010 | 248.09 million | +11.2% |
| 2011 | 238.16 million | -4.0% |
| 2012 | 245.26 million | +3.0% |
| 2013 | 253.53 million | +3.4% |
| 2014 | 299.14 million | +18.0% |
| 2015 | 303.05 million | +1.3% |
| 2016 | 301.74 million | -0.4% |
| 2017 | 317.72 million | +5.3% |
| 2018 | 329.57 million | +3.7% |
| 2019 | 296.04 million | -10.2% |
| 2020 | 281.79 million | -4.8% |
| 2021 | 244.90 million | -13.1% |
| 2022 | 274.35 million | +12.0% |
| 2023 | 286.18 million | +4.3% |
| 2024 | 287.01 million | +0.3% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 287.01 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 20.35 million, 14.1× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 287.01 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.69 million, 8.8× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 income level in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1850 | +519.8% | 1,216 | 7,537 |
| 1866 | +216.0% | 57,868 | 182,845 |
| 1855 | +203.3% | 7,537 | 22,856 |
| 1918 | -60.1% | 6.63 million | 2.65 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 1,216 | 973 | 1,459 | 4 |
| 1850s | 24,132 | 7,537 | 34,040 | 4 |
| 1860s | 113,014 | 44,982 | 236,823 | 10 |
| 1870s | 490,617 | 257,004 | 793,624 | 10 |
| 1880s | 1.24 million | 931,001 | 1.59 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.82 million | 1.80 million | 4.41 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 5.44 million | 4.81 million | 6.53 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 6.16 million | 2.26 million | 8.16 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 4.34 million | 2.06 million | 7.65 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 19.68 million | 10.40 million | 26.97 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 27.77 million | 15.41 million | 40.51 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 67.01 million | 45.17 million | 92.63 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 122.29 million | 96.47 million | 149.19 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 192.90 million | 156.97 million | 221.66 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 245.93 million | 225.58 million | 273.73 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 187.84 million | 118.76 million | 267.40 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 189.06 million | 138.04 million | 226.10 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 283.23 million | 238.16 million | 329.57 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 274.84 million | 244.90 million | 287.01 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 income level in Kazakhstan?
- Co2 income level in Kazakhstan was 287.01 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 income level recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 329.57 million in 2018.
- What is the lowest co2 income level recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 973 in 1832.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for co2 income level?
- Kazakhstan ranks 21st out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 income level rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 income level. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).