Co2 income level in Lithuania
Lithuania: Co2 income level was 12.54 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
12.54 million
Change on year
up 0.3%
World rank
103rd
of 215 countries
All-time high
40.51 million
in 1985
All-time low
153
in 1832
Years of data
173
1830–2024
Co2 income level in Lithuania, 1830–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 income level in Lithuania stood at 12.54 million.
The figure is up 0.3% on the previous year and down 2.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 income level in Lithuania peaked at 40.51 million in 1985 and was at its lowest, 153, in 1832.
Lithuania ranks 103rd of 215 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 income level in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1830 | 191 | — |
| 1831 | 229 | +19.9% |
| 1832 | 153 | -33.2% |
| 1833 | 191 | +24.8% |
| 1850 | 1,184 | +519.9% |
| 1855 | 3,589 | +203.1% |
| 1858 | 5,040 | +40.4% |
| 1859 | 5,345 | +6.1% |
| 1860 | 7,064 | +32.2% |
| 1861 | 8,973 | +27.0% |
| 1862 | 8,094 | -9.8% |
| 1863 | 8,476 | +4.7% |
| 1864 | 9,507 | +12.2% |
| 1865 | 9,087 | -4.4% |
| 1866 | 28,712 | +216.0% |
| 1867 | 32,951 | +14.8% |
| 1868 | 27,414 | -16.8% |
| 1869 | 37,189 | +35.7% |
| 1870 | 40,358 | +8.5% |
| 1871 | 54,485 | +35.0% |
| 1872 | 55,936 | +2.7% |
| 1873 | 52,499 | -6.1% |
| 1874 | 63,725 | +21.4% |
| 1875 | 73,347 | +15.1% |
| 1876 | 91,063 | +24.2% |
| 1877 | 92,934 | +2.1% |
| 1878 | 121,455 | +30.7% |
| 1879 | 124,624 | +2.6% |
| 1880 | 146,197 | +17.3% |
| 1881 | 153,986 | +5.3% |
| 1882 | 162,195 | +5.3% |
| 1883 | 184,607 | +13.8% |
| 1884 | 187,433 | +1.5% |
| 1885 | 204,156 | +8.9% |
| 1886 | 209,387 | +2.6% |
| 1887 | 221,567 | +5.8% |
| 1888 | 231,112 | +4.3% |
| 1889 | 249,592 | +8.0% |
| 1890 | 282,657 | +13.2% |
| 1891 | 311,217 | +10.1% |
| 1892 | 329,429 | +5.9% |
| 1893 | 386,129 | +17.2% |
| 1894 | 393,269 | +1.8% |
| 1895 | 451,877 | +14.9% |
| 1896 | 460,010 | +1.8% |
| 1897 | 531,867 | +15.6% |
| 1898 | 596,509 | +12.2% |
| 1899 | 692,000 | +16.0% |
| 1900 | 783,903 | +13.3% |
| 1901 | 804,788 | +2.7% |
| 1902 | 777,298 | -3.4% |
| 1903 | 760,345 | -2.2% |
| 1904 | 845,948 | +11.3% |
| 1905 | 755,114 | -10.7% |
| 1906 | 861,297 | +14.1% |
| 1907 | 964,730 | +12.0% |
| 1908 | 970,648 | +0.6% |
| 1909 | 1.02 million | +5.6% |
| 1910 | 1.00 million | -1.9% |
| 1911 | 1.04 million | +3.7% |
| 1912 | 1.18 million | +13.3% |
| 1913 | 1.28 million | +8.6% |
| 1914 | 1.16 million | -9.7% |
| 1915 | 1.06 million | -8.2% |
| 1916 | 1.13 million | +6.6% |
| 1917 | 1.04 million | -8.0% |
| 1918 | 415,452 | -60.1% |
| 1919 | 354,858 | -14.6% |
| 1920 | 323,588 | -8.8% |
| 1921 | 350,926 | +8.4% |
| 1922 | 427,976 | +22.0% |
| 1923 | 472,762 | +10.5% |
| 1924 | 563,252 | +19.1% |
| 1925 | 555,922 | -1.3% |
| 1926 | 805,476 | +44.9% |
| 1927 | 1.00 million | +24.3% |
| 1928 | 1.10 million | +10.1% |
| 1929 | 1.19 million | +7.8% |
| 1930 | 1.62 million | +36.5% |
| 1931 | 1.95 million | +20.2% |
| 1932 | 2.19 million | +12.5% |
| 1933 | 2.45 million | +11.8% |
| 1934 | 2.97 million | +20.9% |
| 1935 | 3.35 million | +13.0% |
| 1936 | 3.84 million | +14.5% |
| 1937 | 3.93 million | +2.3% |
| 1938 | 4.15 million | +5.6% |
| 1939 | 4.20 million | +1.2% |
| 1940 | 5.03 million | +19.8% |
| 1941 | 4.42 million | -12.1% |
| 1942 | 2.42 million | -45.3% |
| 1943 | 2.53 million | +4.4% |
| 1944 | 3.66 million | +45.0% |
| 1945 | 3.86 million | +5.5% |
| 1946 | 4.33 million | +12.1% |
| 1947 | 5.21 million | +20.3% |
| 1948 | 5.54 million | +6.2% |
| 1949 | 6.29 million | +13.6% |
| 1950 | 7.00 million | +11.3% |
| 1951 | 7.58 million | +8.3% |
| 1952 | 8.12 million | +7.1% |
| 1953 | 8.59 million | +5.8% |
| 1954 | 9.38 million | +9.1% |
| 1955 | 10.63 million | +13.4% |
| 1956 | 11.67 million | +9.7% |
| 1957 | 12.77 million | +9.4% |
| 1958 | 13.63 million | +6.8% |
| 1959 | 14.33 million | +5.1% |
| 1960 | 14.92 million | +4.1% |
| 1961 | 15.40 million | +3.2% |
| 1962 | 16.18 million | +5.1% |
| 1963 | 17.37 million | +7.3% |
| 1964 | 18.48 million | +6.4% |
| 1965 | 19.60 million | +6.1% |
| 1966 | 20.71 million | +5.6% |
| 1967 | 21.67 million | +4.7% |
| 1968 | 22.30 million | +2.9% |
| 1969 | 23.25 million | +4.2% |
| 1970 | 24.46 million | +5.2% |
| 1971 | 26.01 million | +6.3% |
| 1972 | 27.42 million | +5.4% |
| 1973 | 28.63 million | +4.4% |
| 1974 | 29.79 million | +4.0% |
| 1975 | 31.36 million | +5.3% |
| 1976 | 32.59 million | +3.9% |
| 1977 | 33.72 million | +3.5% |
| 1978 | 34.92 million | +3.6% |
| 1979 | 35.22 million | +0.9% |
| 1980 | 36.61 million | +4.0% |
| 1981 | 35.99 million | -1.7% |
| 1982 | 36.68 million | +1.9% |
| 1983 | 37.24 million | +1.5% |
| 1984 | 37.60 million | +1.0% |
| 1985 | 40.51 million | +7.7% |
| 1986 | 36.06 million | -11.0% |
| 1987 | 36.07 million | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 36.47 million | +1.1% |
| 1989 | 36.82 million | +1.0% |
| 1990 | 35.74 million | -2.9% |
| 1991 | 37.82 million | +5.8% |
| 1992 | 21.17 million | -44.0% |
| 1993 | 16.32 million | -22.9% |
| 1994 | 15.77 million | -3.4% |
| 1995 | 15.06 million | -4.5% |
| 1996 | 15.74 million | +4.5% |
| 1997 | 15.16 million | -3.7% |
| 1998 | 16.00 million | +5.5% |
| 1999 | 13.45 million | -15.9% |
| 2000 | 11.84 million | -11.9% |
| 2001 | 12.59 million | +6.3% |
| 2002 | 12.67 million | +0.6% |
| 2003 | 12.66 million | -0.1% |
| 2004 | 13.25 million | +4.7% |
| 2005 | 13.86 million | +4.6% |
| 2006 | 14.20 million | +2.4% |
| 2007 | 15.47 million | +9.0% |
| 2008 | 14.92 million | -3.6% |
| 2009 | 12.83 million | -14.0% |
| 2010 | 13.80 million | +7.6% |
| 2011 | 13.96 million | +1.1% |
| 2012 | 14.05 million | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 13.15 million | -6.4% |
| 2014 | 12.85 million | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 13.05 million | +1.6% |
| 2016 | 13.10 million | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 13.28 million | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 13.41 million | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 13.65 million | +1.7% |
| 2020 | 13.50 million | -1.1% |
| 2021 | 13.78 million | +2.1% |
| 2022 | 12.90 million | -6.4% |
| 2023 | 12.51 million | -3.0% |
| 2024 | 12.54 million | +0.3% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 12.54 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 30.70 million, 41% of the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 12.54 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.69 million, 38% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 income level in Lithuania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1850 | +519.9% | 191 | 1,184 |
| 1866 | +216.0% | 9,087 | 28,712 |
| 1855 | +203.1% | 1,184 | 3,589 |
| 1918 | -60.1% | 1.04 million | 415,452 |
| 1942 | -45.3% | 4.42 million | 2.42 million |
| 1992 | -44.0% | 37.82 million | 21.17 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 191 | 153 | 229 | 4 |
| 1850s | 3,790 | 1,184 | 5,345 | 4 |
| 1860s | 17,747 | 7,064 | 37,189 | 10 |
| 1870s | 77,043 | 40,358 | 124,624 | 10 |
| 1880s | 195,023 | 146,197 | 249,592 | 10 |
| 1890s | 443,496 | 282,657 | 692,000 | 10 |
| 1900s | 854,871 | 755,114 | 1.02 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 967,190 | 354,858 | 1.28 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 679,277 | 323,588 | 1.19 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 3.06 million | 1.62 million | 4.20 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 4.33 million | 2.42 million | 6.29 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 10.37 million | 7.00 million | 14.33 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 18.99 million | 14.92 million | 23.25 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 30.41 million | 24.46 million | 35.22 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 37.01 million | 35.99 million | 40.51 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 20.22 million | 13.45 million | 37.82 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.43 million | 11.84 million | 15.47 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 13.43 million | 12.85 million | 14.05 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 13.04 million | 12.51 million | 13.78 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More climate change data for Lithuania
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 120.73 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,997 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 590.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,407 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.23 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 85.96 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 854.17 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 843.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.18 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 income level in Lithuania?
- Co2 income level in Lithuania was 12.54 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 income level recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 40.51 million in 1985.
- What is the lowest co2 income level recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 153 in 1832.
- How does Lithuania rank for co2 income level?
- Lithuania ranks 103rd out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 income level rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 income level. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).