Co2 income level in Russia
Russia: Co2 income level was 1.78 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
1.78 billion
Change on year
up 2.7%
World rank
4th
of 215 countries
All-time high
2.54 billion
in 1990
All-time low
8,964
in 1832
Years of data
173
1830–2024
Co2 income level in Russia, 1830–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 income level in Russia stood at 1.78 billion.
That represents a change of up 2.7% on the previous year and up 8.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 income level in Russia peaked at 2.54 billion in 1990 and was at its lowest, 8,964, in 1832.
Russia ranks 4th of 215 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 income level in Russia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1830 | 11,204 | — |
| 1831 | 13,445 | +20.0% |
| 1832 | 8,964 | -33.3% |
| 1833 | 11,204 | +25.0% |
| 1850 | 69,467 | +520.0% |
| 1855 | 210,643 | +203.2% |
| 1858 | 295,796 | +40.4% |
| 1859 | 313,723 | +6.1% |
| 1860 | 414,563 | +32.1% |
| 1861 | 526,607 | +27.0% |
| 1862 | 475,067 | -9.8% |
| 1863 | 497,476 | +4.7% |
| 1864 | 557,980 | +12.2% |
| 1865 | 533,330 | -4.4% |
| 1866 | 1.69 million | +216.0% |
| 1867 | 1.93 million | +14.8% |
| 1868 | 1.61 million | -16.8% |
| 1869 | 2.18 million | +35.7% |
| 1870 | 2.37 million | +8.5% |
| 1871 | 3.20 million | +35.0% |
| 1872 | 3.28 million | +2.7% |
| 1873 | 3.08 million | -6.1% |
| 1874 | 3.74 million | +21.4% |
| 1875 | 4.30 million | +15.1% |
| 1876 | 5.34 million | +24.2% |
| 1877 | 5.45 million | +2.1% |
| 1878 | 7.13 million | +30.7% |
| 1879 | 7.31 million | +2.6% |
| 1880 | 8.58 million | +17.3% |
| 1881 | 9.04 million | +5.3% |
| 1882 | 9.52 million | +5.3% |
| 1883 | 10.83 million | +13.8% |
| 1884 | 11.00 million | +1.5% |
| 1885 | 11.98 million | +8.9% |
| 1886 | 12.29 million | +2.6% |
| 1887 | 13.00 million | +5.8% |
| 1888 | 13.56 million | +4.3% |
| 1889 | 14.65 million | +8.0% |
| 1890 | 16.59 million | +13.2% |
| 1891 | 18.27 million | +10.1% |
| 1892 | 19.33 million | +5.9% |
| 1893 | 22.66 million | +17.2% |
| 1894 | 23.08 million | +1.8% |
| 1895 | 26.52 million | +14.9% |
| 1896 | 27.00 million | +1.8% |
| 1897 | 31.22 million | +15.6% |
| 1898 | 35.01 million | +12.2% |
| 1899 | 40.61 million | +16.0% |
| 1900 | 46.01 million | +13.3% |
| 1901 | 47.23 million | +2.7% |
| 1902 | 45.62 million | -3.4% |
| 1903 | 44.62 million | -2.2% |
| 1904 | 49.65 million | +11.3% |
| 1905 | 44.32 million | -10.7% |
| 1906 | 50.55 million | +14.1% |
| 1907 | 56.62 million | +12.0% |
| 1908 | 56.97 million | +0.6% |
| 1909 | 60.14 million | +5.6% |
| 1910 | 58.98 million | -1.9% |
| 1911 | 61.14 million | +3.7% |
| 1912 | 69.26 million | +13.3% |
| 1913 | 75.24 million | +8.6% |
| 1914 | 67.91 million | -9.7% |
| 1915 | 62.33 million | -8.2% |
| 1916 | 66.43 million | +6.6% |
| 1917 | 61.14 million | -8.0% |
| 1918 | 24.38 million | -60.1% |
| 1919 | 20.83 million | -14.6% |
| 1920 | 18.99 million | -8.8% |
| 1921 | 20.60 million | +8.4% |
| 1922 | 25.12 million | +22.0% |
| 1923 | 27.75 million | +10.5% |
| 1924 | 33.06 million | +19.1% |
| 1925 | 32.63 million | -1.3% |
| 1926 | 47.27 million | +44.9% |
| 1927 | 58.77 million | +24.3% |
| 1928 | 65.29 million | +11.1% |
| 1929 | 70.32 million | +7.7% |
| 1930 | 95.59 million | +35.9% |
| 1931 | 114.84 million | +20.1% |
| 1932 | 129.39 million | +12.7% |
| 1933 | 144.60 million | +11.8% |
| 1934 | 174.92 million | +21.0% |
| 1935 | 198.00 million | +13.2% |
| 1936 | 227.04 million | +14.7% |
| 1937 | 232.16 million | +2.3% |
| 1938 | 245.03 million | +5.5% |
| 1939 | 248.04 million | +1.2% |
| 1940 | 297.36 million | +19.9% |
| 1941 | 261.24 million | -12.1% |
| 1942 | 142.03 million | -45.6% |
| 1943 | 148.22 million | +4.4% |
| 1944 | 214.95 million | +45.0% |
| 1945 | 227.57 million | +5.9% |
| 1946 | 255.75 million | +12.4% |
| 1947 | 307.96 million | +20.4% |
| 1948 | 327.70 million | +6.4% |
| 1949 | 372.52 million | +13.7% |
| 1950 | 415.23 million | +11.5% |
| 1951 | 450.02 million | +8.4% |
| 1952 | 481.90 million | +7.1% |
| 1953 | 509.83 million | +5.8% |
| 1954 | 556.80 million | +9.2% |
| 1955 | 631.36 million | +13.4% |
| 1956 | 692.23 million | +9.6% |
| 1957 | 757.51 million | +9.4% |
| 1958 | 808.56 million | +6.7% |
| 1959 | 850.09 million | +5.1% |
| 1960 | 885.07 million | +4.1% |
| 1961 | 912.75 million | +3.1% |
| 1962 | 957.99 million | +5.0% |
| 1963 | 1.03 billion | +7.2% |
| 1964 | 1.09 billion | +6.4% |
| 1965 | 1.16 billion | +6.1% |
| 1966 | 1.22 billion | +5.6% |
| 1967 | 1.28 billion | +4.6% |
| 1968 | 1.32 billion | +2.8% |
| 1969 | 1.37 billion | +4.1% |
| 1970 | 1.44 billion | +5.2% |
| 1971 | 1.53 billion | +6.1% |
| 1972 | 1.61 billion | +5.2% |
| 1973 | 1.68 billion | +4.2% |
| 1974 | 1.74 billion | +3.8% |
| 1975 | 1.83 billion | +5.1% |
| 1976 | 1.90 billion | +3.9% |
| 1977 | 1.97 billion | +3.4% |
| 1978 | 2.03 billion | +3.4% |
| 1979 | 2.05 billion | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 2.13 billion | +3.9% |
| 1981 | 2.09 billion | -1.9% |
| 1982 | 2.13 billion | +1.9% |
| 1983 | 2.16 billion | +1.4% |
| 1984 | 2.18 billion | +0.9% |
| 1985 | 2.35 billion | +7.8% |
| 1986 | 2.35 billion | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 2.36 billion | +0.4% |
| 1988 | 2.44 billion | +3.3% |
| 1989 | 2.41 billion | -1.3% |
| 1990 | 2.54 billion | +5.4% |
| 1991 | 2.41 billion | -5.1% |
| 1992 | 1.96 billion | -18.4% |
| 1993 | 1.87 billion | -4.9% |
| 1994 | 1.65 billion | -11.8% |
| 1995 | 1.62 billion | -1.7% |
| 1996 | 1.59 billion | -2.0% |
| 1997 | 1.48 billion | -6.6% |
| 1998 | 1.47 billion | -1.1% |
| 1999 | 1.49 billion | +1.9% |
| 2000 | 1.48 billion | -0.9% |
| 2001 | 1.52 billion | +2.5% |
| 2002 | 1.51 billion | -0.6% |
| 2003 | 1.54 billion | +2.0% |
| 2004 | 1.55 billion | +0.4% |
| 2005 | 1.56 billion | +1.2% |
| 2006 | 1.62 billion | +3.8% |
| 2007 | 1.62 billion | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 1.65 billion | +1.7% |
| 2009 | 1.55 billion | -6.5% |
| 2010 | 1.63 billion | +5.7% |
| 2011 | 1.68 billion | +3.2% |
| 2012 | 1.70 billion | +0.9% |
| 2013 | 1.64 billion | -3.7% |
| 2014 | 1.64 billion | -0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.64 billion | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 1.63 billion | -0.4% |
| 2017 | 1.66 billion | +1.9% |
| 2018 | 1.71 billion | +2.9% |
| 2019 | 1.70 billion | -0.3% |
| 2020 | 1.63 billion | -4.3% |
| 2021 | 1.67 billion | +2.6% |
| 2022 | 1.68 billion | +0.1% |
| 2023 | 1.73 billion | +3.4% |
| 2024 | 1.78 billion | +2.7% |
Russia compared with similar countries
- Russia's 1.78 billion is above the median for high income countries, which is 30.70 million, 58.0× the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Russia's 1.78 billion is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.69 million, 54.5× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 income level in Russia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1850 | +520.0% | 11,204 | 69,467 |
| 1866 | +216.0% | 533,330 | 1.69 million |
| 1855 | +203.2% | 69,467 | 210,643 |
| 1918 | -60.1% | 61.14 million | 24.38 million |
| 1942 | -45.6% | 261.24 million | 142.03 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 11,204 | 8,964 | 13,445 | 4 |
| 1850s | 222,407 | 69,467 | 313,723 | 4 |
| 1860s | 1.04 million | 414,563 | 2.18 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 4.52 million | 2.37 million | 7.31 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 11.45 million | 8.58 million | 14.65 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 26.03 million | 16.59 million | 40.61 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 50.17 million | 44.32 million | 60.14 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 56.76 million | 20.83 million | 75.24 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 39.98 million | 18.99 million | 70.32 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 180.96 million | 95.59 million | 248.04 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 255.53 million | 142.03 million | 372.52 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 615.35 million | 415.23 million | 850.09 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.12 billion | 885.07 million | 1.37 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.78 billion | 1.44 billion | 2.05 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.26 billion | 2.09 billion | 2.44 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.81 billion | 1.47 billion | 2.54 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.56 billion | 1.48 billion | 1.65 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.66 billion | 1.63 billion | 1.71 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.70 billion | 1.63 billion | 1.78 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Russia
More climate change data for Russia
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 84,904 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 18,247 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 66,658 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 68.86 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2,381 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 18,764 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 16,121 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,643 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 60.84 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 94.39 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 income level in Russia?
- Co2 income level in Russia was 1.78 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 income level recorded in Russia?
- The highest recorded value was 2.54 billion in 1990.
- What is the lowest co2 income level recorded in Russia?
- The lowest recorded value was 8,964 in 1832.
- How does Russia rank for co2 income level?
- Russia ranks 4th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 income level rising or falling in Russia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Russia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 income level. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).