Co2 income level in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Co2 income level was 139.23 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
139.23 million
Change on year
up 13.3%
World rank
35th
of 215 countries
All-time high
139.23 million
in 2024
All-time low
381
in 1832
Years of data
173
1830–2024
Co2 income level in Uzbekistan, 1830–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 income level in Uzbekistan stood at 139.23 million. That is the highest value across all 173 years on record.
That represents a change of up 13.3% on the previous year and up 29.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 income level in Uzbekistan peaked at 139.23 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 381, in 1832.
That places Uzbekistan 35th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 income level in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1830 | 477 | — |
| 1831 | 572 | +19.9% |
| 1832 | 381 | -33.4% |
| 1833 | 477 | +25.2% |
| 1850 | 2,956 | +519.7% |
| 1855 | 8,964 | +203.2% |
| 1858 | 12,588 | +40.4% |
| 1859 | 13,351 | +6.1% |
| 1860 | 17,642 | +32.1% |
| 1861 | 22,411 | +27.0% |
| 1862 | 20,217 | -9.8% |
| 1863 | 21,171 | +4.7% |
| 1864 | 23,746 | +12.2% |
| 1865 | 22,697 | -4.4% |
| 1866 | 71,714 | +216.0% |
| 1867 | 82,299 | +14.8% |
| 1868 | 68,472 | -16.8% |
| 1869 | 92,885 | +35.7% |
| 1870 | 100,800 | +8.5% |
| 1871 | 136,085 | +35.0% |
| 1872 | 139,709 | +2.7% |
| 1873 | 131,126 | -6.1% |
| 1874 | 159,163 | +21.4% |
| 1875 | 183,195 | +15.1% |
| 1876 | 227,444 | +24.2% |
| 1877 | 232,117 | +2.1% |
| 1878 | 303,354 | +30.7% |
| 1879 | 311,269 | +2.6% |
| 1880 | 365,150 | +17.3% |
| 1881 | 384,605 | +5.3% |
| 1882 | 405,108 | +5.3% |
| 1883 | 461,087 | +13.8% |
| 1884 | 468,144 | +1.5% |
| 1885 | 509,913 | +8.9% |
| 1886 | 522,978 | +2.6% |
| 1887 | 553,400 | +5.8% |
| 1888 | 577,241 | +4.3% |
| 1889 | 623,397 | +8.0% |
| 1890 | 705,983 | +13.2% |
| 1891 | 777,315 | +10.1% |
| 1892 | 822,804 | +5.9% |
| 1893 | 964,420 | +17.2% |
| 1894 | 982,253 | +1.8% |
| 1895 | 1.13 million | +14.9% |
| 1896 | 1.15 million | +1.8% |
| 1897 | 1.33 million | +15.6% |
| 1898 | 1.49 million | +12.2% |
| 1899 | 1.73 million | +16.0% |
| 1900 | 1.96 million | +13.3% |
| 1901 | 2.01 million | +2.7% |
| 1902 | 1.94 million | -3.4% |
| 1903 | 1.90 million | -2.2% |
| 1904 | 2.11 million | +11.3% |
| 1905 | 1.89 million | -10.7% |
| 1906 | 2.15 million | +14.1% |
| 1907 | 2.41 million | +12.0% |
| 1908 | 2.42 million | +0.6% |
| 1909 | 2.56 million | +5.6% |
| 1910 | 2.51 million | -1.9% |
| 1911 | 2.60 million | +3.7% |
| 1912 | 2.95 million | +13.3% |
| 1913 | 3.20 million | +8.6% |
| 1914 | 2.89 million | -9.7% |
| 1915 | 2.65 million | -8.2% |
| 1916 | 2.83 million | +6.6% |
| 1917 | 2.60 million | -8.0% |
| 1918 | 1.04 million | -60.1% |
| 1919 | 886,317 | -14.6% |
| 1920 | 808,213 | -8.8% |
| 1921 | 876,494 | +8.4% |
| 1922 | 1.07 million | +22.0% |
| 1923 | 1.18 million | +10.5% |
| 1924 | 1.41 million | +19.1% |
| 1925 | 1.39 million | -1.3% |
| 1926 | 2.01 million | +44.9% |
| 1927 | 2.50 million | +24.3% |
| 1928 | 2.69 million | +7.5% |
| 1929 | 2.89 million | +7.6% |
| 1930 | 3.97 million | +37.2% |
| 1931 | 4.78 million | +20.5% |
| 1932 | 5.38 million | +12.4% |
| 1933 | 6.04 million | +12.4% |
| 1934 | 7.29 million | +20.7% |
| 1935 | 8.22 million | +12.8% |
| 1936 | 9.39 million | +14.2% |
| 1937 | 9.63 million | +2.5% |
| 1938 | 10.17 million | +5.6% |
| 1939 | 10.29 million | +1.2% |
| 1940 | 12.36 million | +20.1% |
| 1941 | 10.83 million | -12.4% |
| 1942 | 6.04 million | -44.2% |
| 1943 | 6.31 million | +4.4% |
| 1944 | 9.15 million | +45.0% |
| 1945 | 9.58 million | +4.7% |
| 1946 | 10.69 million | +11.6% |
| 1947 | 12.84 million | +20.1% |
| 1948 | 13.60 million | +5.9% |
| 1949 | 15.43 million | +13.5% |
| 1950 | 17.14 million | +11.0% |
| 1951 | 18.53 million | +8.1% |
| 1952 | 19.82 million | +7.0% |
| 1953 | 20.94 million | +5.7% |
| 1954 | 22.82 million | +8.9% |
| 1955 | 25.86 million | +13.3% |
| 1956 | 28.43 million | +9.9% |
| 1957 | 31.16 million | +9.6% |
| 1958 | 33.33 million | +7.0% |
| 1959 | 35.06 million | +5.2% |
| 1960 | 36.54 million | +4.2% |
| 1961 | 37.81 million | +3.5% |
| 1962 | 39.82 million | +5.3% |
| 1963 | 42.85 million | +7.6% |
| 1964 | 45.71 million | +6.7% |
| 1965 | 48.57 million | +6.2% |
| 1966 | 51.33 million | +5.7% |
| 1967 | 53.78 million | +4.8% |
| 1968 | 55.40 million | +3.0% |
| 1969 | 57.77 million | +4.3% |
| 1970 | 60.63 million | +5.0% |
| 1971 | 64.49 million | +6.4% |
| 1972 | 67.86 million | +5.2% |
| 1973 | 70.77 million | +4.3% |
| 1974 | 73.51 million | +3.9% |
| 1975 | 77.30 million | +5.2% |
| 1976 | 80.28 million | +3.9% |
| 1977 | 83.00 million | +3.4% |
| 1978 | 85.86 million | +3.4% |
| 1979 | 86.55 million | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 89.88 million | +3.8% |
| 1981 | 88.28 million | -1.8% |
| 1982 | 89.97 million | +1.9% |
| 1983 | 91.26 million | +1.4% |
| 1984 | 92.11 million | +0.9% |
| 1985 | 99.28 million | +7.8% |
| 1986 | 95.24 million | -4.1% |
| 1987 | 97.69 million | +2.6% |
| 1988 | 101.11 million | +3.5% |
| 1989 | 104.13 million | +3.0% |
| 1990 | 103.12 million | -1.0% |
| 1991 | 102.32 million | -0.8% |
| 1992 | 110.99 million | +8.5% |
| 1993 | 115.62 million | +4.2% |
| 1994 | 109.79 million | -5.0% |
| 1995 | 104.80 million | -4.5% |
| 1996 | 108.19 million | +3.2% |
| 1997 | 109.03 million | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 120.98 million | +11.0% |
| 1999 | 123.59 million | +2.2% |
| 2000 | 123.48 million | -0.1% |
| 2001 | 126.22 million | +2.2% |
| 2002 | 132.58 million | +5.0% |
| 2003 | 130.30 million | -1.7% |
| 2004 | 129.10 million | -0.9% |
| 2005 | 121.60 million | -5.8% |
| 2006 | 124.90 million | +2.7% |
| 2007 | 123.82 million | -0.9% |
| 2008 | 128.39 million | +3.7% |
| 2009 | 109.23 million | -14.9% |
| 2010 | 107.67 million | -1.4% |
| 2011 | 116.75 million | +8.4% |
| 2012 | 118.86 million | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 112.39 million | -5.4% |
| 2014 | 107.50 million | -4.4% |
| 2015 | 103.37 million | -3.8% |
| 2016 | 109.84 million | +6.3% |
| 2017 | 108.88 million | -0.9% |
| 2018 | 102.33 million | -6.0% |
| 2019 | 107.95 million | +5.5% |
| 2020 | 108.14 million | +0.2% |
| 2021 | 123.16 million | +13.9% |
| 2022 | 119.11 million | -3.3% |
| 2023 | 122.87 million | +3.2% |
| 2024 | 139.23 million | +13.3% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 139.23 million is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 12.04 million, 11.6× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's 139.23 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.69 million, 4.3× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 income level in Uzbekistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1850 | +519.7% | 477 | 2,956 |
| 1866 | +216.0% | 22,697 | 71,714 |
| 1855 | +203.2% | 2,956 | 8,964 |
| 1918 | -60.1% | 2.60 million | 1.04 million |
| 1942 | -44.2% | 10.83 million | 6.04 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 476.75 | 381 | 572 | 4 |
| 1850s | 9,465 | 2,956 | 13,351 | 4 |
| 1860s | 44,325 | 17,642 | 92,885 | 10 |
| 1870s | 192,426 | 100,800 | 311,269 | 10 |
| 1880s | 487,102 | 365,150 | 623,397 | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.11 million | 705,983 | 1.73 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 2.14 million | 1.89 million | 2.56 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 2.42 million | 886,317 | 3.20 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.68 million | 808,213 | 2.89 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 7.52 million | 3.97 million | 10.29 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 10.68 million | 6.04 million | 15.43 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 25.31 million | 17.14 million | 35.06 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 46.96 million | 36.54 million | 57.77 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 75.03 million | 60.63 million | 86.55 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 94.89 million | 88.28 million | 104.13 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 110.84 million | 102.32 million | 123.59 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 124.96 million | 109.23 million | 132.58 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 109.55 million | 102.33 million | 118.86 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 122.50 million | 108.14 million | 139.23 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More climate change data for Uzbekistan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 974.02 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 23,306 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,291 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 18,015 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 643.38 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 6,140 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,778 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 362.14 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 21.8 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 income level in Uzbekistan?
- Co2 income level in Uzbekistan was 139.23 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 income level recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 139.23 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest co2 income level recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 381 in 1832.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for co2 income level?
- Uzbekistan ranks 35th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 income level rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 29.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 income level. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).