Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Chile
Chile: Co2 intensity, annual growth rate was 0.0853 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2022)
0.0853 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 101.3%
World rank
64th
of 164 countries
All-time high
94.28 % change on previous year
in 1857
All-time low
-95.53 % change on previous year
in 1854
Years of data
177
1845–2022
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Chile, 1845–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Chile is 0.0853 % change on previous year, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of up 101.3% on the previous year and up 102.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Chile peaked at 94.28 % change on previous year in 1857 and was at its lowest, -95.53 % change on previous year, in 1854.
Chile ranks 64th of 164 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Chile, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1845 | 43.51 % change on previous year | — |
| 1846 | 21.38 % change on previous year | -50.9% |
| 1847 | 18.88 % change on previous year | -11.7% |
| 1848 | 7.86 % change on previous year | -58.4% |
| 1849 | 69.62 % change on previous year | +786.0% |
| 1850 | -23.45 % change on previous year | -133.7% |
| 1851 | 12.06 % change on previous year | -151.4% |
| 1852 | 59.69 % change on previous year | +394.9% |
| 1853 | -34.76 % change on previous year | -158.2% |
| 1854 | -95.53 % change on previous year | +174.8% |
| 1856 | 42.95 % change on previous year | -145.0% |
| 1857 | 94.28 % change on previous year | +119.5% |
| 1858 | -3.34 % change on previous year | -103.5% |
| 1859 | -46.69 % change on previous year | +1299.4% |
| 1860 | 61.49 % change on previous year | -231.7% |
| 1861 | -30.11 % change on previous year | -149.0% |
| 1862 | -1.21 % change on previous year | -96.0% |
| 1863 | -17.23 % change on previous year | +1323.5% |
| 1864 | 46.18 % change on previous year | -368.1% |
| 1865 | -2.04 % change on previous year | -104.4% |
| 1866 | 31.81 % change on previous year | -1659.2% |
| 1867 | 66.5 % change on previous year | +109.0% |
| 1868 | -25.93 % change on previous year | -139.0% |
| 1869 | -4.23 % change on previous year | -83.7% |
| 1870 | -11.12 % change on previous year | +162.8% |
| 1871 | -11.43 % change on previous year | +2.9% |
| 1872 | 67.32 % change on previous year | -688.7% |
| 1873 | 13.81 % change on previous year | -79.5% |
| 1874 | 33.39 % change on previous year | +141.8% |
| 1875 | -16.21 % change on previous year | -148.6% |
| 1876 | 10.53 % change on previous year | -165.0% |
| 1877 | -13.17 % change on previous year | -225.0% |
| 1878 | -10.43 % change on previous year | -20.8% |
| 1879 | -4.62 % change on previous year | -55.7% |
| 1880 | 14.1 % change on previous year | -405.0% |
| 1881 | -3.68 % change on previous year | -126.1% |
| 1882 | -2.86 % change on previous year | -22.3% |
| 1883 | -12.62 % change on previous year | +341.9% |
| 1884 | 1.04 % change on previous year | -108.2% |
| 1885 | 7.51 % change on previous year | +622.1% |
| 1886 | -12.95 % change on previous year | -272.5% |
| 1887 | -9.43 % change on previous year | -27.1% |
| 1888 | 54.07 % change on previous year | -673.1% |
| 1889 | -11.36 % change on previous year | -121.0% |
| 1890 | -10.2 % change on previous year | -10.2% |
| 1891 | 12.86 % change on previous year | -226.0% |
| 1892 | -18.75 % change on previous year | -245.8% |
| 1893 | 2.03 % change on previous year | -110.8% |
| 1894 | 46.7 % change on previous year | +2204.7% |
| 1895 | -14.65 % change on previous year | -131.4% |
| 1896 | 5.97 % change on previous year | -140.8% |
| 1897 | -12.79 % change on previous year | -314.2% |
| 1898 | -1.93 % change on previous year | -84.9% |
| 1899 | 3.56 % change on previous year | -284.2% |
| 1900 | -0.4642 % change on previous year | -113.1% |
| 1901 | 4.21 % change on previous year | -1007.6% |
| 1902 | -13.2 % change on previous year | -413.2% |
| 1903 | 12.29 % change on previous year | -193.1% |
| 1904 | -15.19 % change on previous year | -223.6% |
| 1905 | 34.89 % change on previous year | -329.6% |
| 1906 | -6.42 % change on previous year | -118.4% |
| 1907 | 33.79 % change on previous year | -626.2% |
| 1908 | -12.24 % change on previous year | -136.2% |
| 1909 | -0.8009 % change on previous year | -93.5% |
| 1910 | -10.98 % change on previous year | +1270.8% |
| 1911 | 16.05 % change on previous year | -246.2% |
| 1912 | 4.32 % change on previous year | -73.1% |
| 1913 | -4.07 % change on previous year | -194.2% |
| 1914 | -6.88 % change on previous year | +68.9% |
| 1915 | -26.47 % change on previous year | +285.0% |
| 1916 | -0.5086 % change on previous year | -98.1% |
| 1917 | 1.02 % change on previous year | -299.6% |
| 1918 | -11.06 % change on previous year | -1189.4% |
| 1919 | 5.52 % change on previous year | -149.9% |
| 1920 | -27.79 % change on previous year | -603.7% |
| 1921 | 51.86 % change on previous year | -286.6% |
| 1922 | -39.48 % change on previous year | -176.1% |
| 1923 | -5.48 % change on previous year | -86.1% |
| 1924 | 34.16 % change on previous year | -723.8% |
| 1925 | -7.64 % change on previous year | -122.4% |
| 1926 | 0.3867 % change on previous year | -105.1% |
| 1927 | 0.8048 % change on previous year | +108.1% |
| 1928 | -25 % change on previous year | -3206.2% |
| 1929 | 7.36 % change on previous year | -129.4% |
| 1930 | 5.77 % change on previous year | -21.6% |
| 1931 | -4.94 % change on previous year | -185.6% |
| 1932 | 25.87 % change on previous year | -624.1% |
| 1933 | 7.9 % change on previous year | -69.5% |
| 1934 | -2.39 % change on previous year | -130.3% |
| 1935 | -6.39 % change on previous year | +166.9% |
| 1936 | 5.95 % change on previous year | -193.1% |
| 1937 | -3.26 % change on previous year | -154.9% |
| 1938 | -0.1062 % change on previous year | -96.7% |
| 1939 | -10.2 % change on previous year | +9508.8% |
| 1940 | 12.05 % change on previous year | -218.2% |
| 1941 | -2.65 % change on previous year | -122.0% |
| 1942 | -2.13 % change on previous year | -19.6% |
| 1943 | 1.91 % change on previous year | -189.5% |
| 1944 | -3.66 % change on previous year | -292.2% |
| 1945 | -12.07 % change on previous year | +229.6% |
| 1946 | -7.43 % change on previous year | -38.4% |
| 1947 | 16.08 % change on previous year | -316.3% |
| 1948 | -9.42 % change on previous year | -158.6% |
| 1949 | -7.94 % change on previous year | -15.8% |
| 1950 | 72.27 % change on previous year | -1010.6% |
| 1951 | 1.53 % change on previous year | -97.9% |
| 1952 | -0.0391 % change on previous year | -102.5% |
| 1953 | -8.47 % change on previous year | +21567.2% |
| 1954 | 10.38 % change on previous year | -222.5% |
| 1955 | 0.9431 % change on previous year | -90.9% |
| 1956 | 0.757 % change on previous year | -19.7% |
| 1957 | -9.92 % change on previous year | -1410.5% |
| 1958 | 0.6874 % change on previous year | -106.9% |
| 1959 | 8.07 % change on previous year | +1074.3% |
| 1960 | -2.19 % change on previous year | -127.1% |
| 1961 | 2.54 % change on previous year | -216.3% |
| 1962 | 10.47 % change on previous year | +311.5% |
| 1963 | -2.26 % change on previous year | -121.6% |
| 1964 | -1.03 % change on previous year | -54.4% |
| 1965 | 0.7866 % change on previous year | -176.1% |
| 1966 | -4.77 % change on previous year | -706.4% |
| 1967 | -0.6464 % change on previous year | -86.4% |
| 1968 | 6.51 % change on previous year | -1107.7% |
| 1969 | 2.6 % change on previous year | -60.0% |
| 1970 | 7.26 % change on previous year | +178.7% |
| 1971 | 0.7405 % change on previous year | -89.8% |
| 1972 | 5.14 % change on previous year | +594.0% |
| 1973 | 3.68 % change on previous year | -28.4% |
| 1974 | -7.24 % change on previous year | -296.8% |
| 1975 | 1.74 % change on previous year | -124.0% |
| 1976 | 0.8501 % change on previous year | -51.1% |
| 1977 | -12.95 % change on previous year | -1623.4% |
| 1978 | -8.37 % change on previous year | -35.4% |
| 1979 | -0.1342 % change on previous year | -98.4% |
| 1980 | -6.15 % change on previous year | +4479.7% |
| 1981 | -8.7 % change on previous year | +41.5% |
| 1982 | -2.86 % change on previous year | -67.1% |
| 1983 | 3.76 % change on previous year | -231.4% |
| 1984 | 0.4546 % change on previous year | -87.9% |
| 1985 | -5.13 % change on previous year | -1228.7% |
| 1986 | -1.88 % change on previous year | -63.4% |
| 1987 | -4.45 % change on previous year | +136.8% |
| 1988 | 10.63 % change on previous year | -338.9% |
| 1989 | 8.76 % change on previous year | -17.6% |
| 1990 | -0.9567 % change on previous year | -110.9% |
| 1991 | -12.49 % change on previous year | +1205.5% |
| 1992 | -7.13 % change on previous year | -42.9% |
| 1993 | 0.2324 % change on previous year | -103.3% |
| 1994 | 6.04 % change on previous year | +2500.9% |
| 1995 | -0.4297 % change on previous year | -107.1% |
| 1996 | 8.75 % change on previous year | -2136.2% |
| 1997 | 9.52 % change on previous year | +8.8% |
| 1998 | -0.205 % change on previous year | -102.2% |
| 1999 | 8.78 % change on previous year | -4380.7% |
| 2000 | -8.23 % change on previous year | -193.8% |
| 2001 | -11.92 % change on previous year | +44.9% |
| 2002 | 2.07 % change on previous year | -117.4% |
| 2003 | -2.5 % change on previous year | -220.6% |
| 2004 | 2.02 % change on previous year | -180.8% |
| 2005 | -1.94 % change on previous year | -196.3% |
| 2006 | -0.6555 % change on previous year | -66.3% |
| 2007 | 5.54 % change on previous year | -945.9% |
| 2008 | -2.54 % change on previous year | -145.8% |
| 2009 | -4.26 % change on previous year | +67.6% |
| 2010 | 3.19 % change on previous year | -174.9% |
| 2011 | 3.85 % change on previous year | +20.8% |
| 2012 | -3.93 % change on previous year | -202.0% |
| 2013 | -0.6349 % change on previous year | -83.8% |
| 2014 | -6.75 % change on previous year | +962.5% |
| 2015 | 3.18 % change on previous year | -147.2% |
| 2016 | 1.25 % change on previous year | -60.8% |
| 2017 | -1.48 % change on previous year | -218.2% |
| 2018 | -3.48 % change on previous year | +136.2% |
| 2019 | 8.12 % change on previous year | -333.0% |
| 2020 | -7.12 % change on previous year | -187.7% |
| 2021 | -6.65 % change on previous year | -6.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0853 % change on previous year | -101.3% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0.0853 % change on previous year is above the median for high income countries, which is -4.8 % change on previous year. (54 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0.0853 % change on previous year is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0853 % change on previous year, 1.0× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1953 | -21567.2% | -0.0391 % change on previous year | -8.47 % change on previous year |
| 1939 | -9508.8% | -0.1062 % change on previous year | -10.2 % change on previous year |
| 1980 | -4479.7% | -0.1342 % change on previous year | -6.15 % change on previous year |
| 1999 | +4380.7% | -0.205 % change on previous year | 8.78 % change on previous year |
| 1928 | -3206.2% | 0.8048 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year |
| 1994 | +2500.9% | 0.2324 % change on previous year | 6.04 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 32.25 % change on previous year | 7.86 % change on previous year | 69.62 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 1850s | 0.5808 % change on previous year | -95.53 % change on previous year | 94.28 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1860s | 12.52 % change on previous year | -30.11 % change on previous year | 66.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 5.81 % change on previous year | -16.21 % change on previous year | 67.32 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.38 % change on previous year | -12.95 % change on previous year | 54.07 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.28 % change on previous year | -18.75 % change on previous year | 46.7 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 3.69 % change on previous year | -15.19 % change on previous year | 34.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | -3.31 % change on previous year | -26.47 % change on previous year | 16.05 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.08 % change on previous year | -39.48 % change on previous year | 51.86 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.82 % change on previous year | -10.2 % change on previous year | 25.87 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.53 % change on previous year | -12.07 % change on previous year | 16.08 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 7.62 % change on previous year | -9.92 % change on previous year | 72.27 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.2 % change on previous year | -4.77 % change on previous year | 10.47 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.9291 % change on previous year | -12.95 % change on previous year | 7.26 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.5563 % change on previous year | -8.7 % change on previous year | 10.63 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.21 % change on previous year | -12.49 % change on previous year | 9.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -2.24 % change on previous year | -11.92 % change on previous year | 5.54 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.332 % change on previous year | -6.75 % change on previous year | 8.12 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -4.56 % change on previous year | -7.12 % change on previous year | 0.0853 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 61 Syria 0.1679 % change on previous year compare
- 62 Costa Rica 0.1657 % change on previous year compare
- 63 Bahrain 0.1079 % change on previous year compare
- 65 Philippines 0.0229 % change on previous year compare
- 66 Oman -0.3612 % change on previous year compare
- 67 Cote d'Ivoire -0.5282 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Chile
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 306.17 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 15,030 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,258 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10,772 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 16.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 384.71 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,205 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,015 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 189.84 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 7.61 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Chile?
- Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Chile was 0.0853 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 94.28 % change on previous year in 1857.
- What is the lowest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -95.53 % change on previous year in 1854.
- How does Chile rank for co2 intensity, annual growth rate?
- Chile ranks 64th out of 164 countries with data for 2022.
- Is co2 intensity, annual growth rate rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 102.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Co2 intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 177 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Co2 intensity Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.