Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Finland
Finland: Co2 intensity, annual growth rate was -5.88 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2022)
-5.88 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 117.9%
World rank
122nd
of 164 countries
All-time high
374.15 % change on previous year
in 1946
All-time low
-83.76 % change on previous year
in 1915
Years of data
162
1861–2022
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Finland, 1861–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2022, co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Finland stood at -5.88 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of down 117.9% on the previous year and up 30.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Finland peaked at 374.15 % change on previous year in 1946 and was at its lowest, -83.76 % change on previous year, in 1915.
Finland ranks 122nd of 164 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Finland, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1861 | 97.53 % change on previous year | — |
| 1862 | 5.73 % change on previous year | -94.1% |
| 1863 | -2.9 % change on previous year | -150.7% |
| 1864 | -39.46 % change on previous year | +1259.6% |
| 1865 | 31.82 % change on previous year | -180.6% |
| 1866 | 10.54 % change on previous year | -66.9% |
| 1867 | -2.76 % change on previous year | -126.2% |
| 1868 | 28.53 % change on previous year | -1132.3% |
| 1869 | -26.12 % change on previous year | -191.6% |
| 1870 | 25.64 % change on previous year | -198.2% |
| 1871 | 23.2 % change on previous year | -9.5% |
| 1872 | -22.08 % change on previous year | -195.1% |
| 1873 | -9.28 % change on previous year | -57.9% |
| 1874 | 38.46 % change on previous year | -514.3% |
| 1875 | -33.66 % change on previous year | -187.5% |
| 1876 | 7.07 % change on previous year | -121.0% |
| 1877 | 22.15 % change on previous year | +213.3% |
| 1878 | 15 % change on previous year | -32.3% |
| 1879 | -40.61 % change on previous year | -370.7% |
| 1880 | 27.8 % change on previous year | -168.5% |
| 1881 | 2.81 % change on previous year | -89.9% |
| 1882 | 11.33 % change on previous year | +302.6% |
| 1883 | -6.58 % change on previous year | -158.1% |
| 1884 | 21.07 % change on previous year | -420.2% |
| 1885 | 50.2 % change on previous year | +138.3% |
| 1886 | -44.47 % change on previous year | -188.6% |
| 1887 | -1.55 % change on previous year | -96.5% |
| 1888 | -9.07 % change on previous year | +485.2% |
| 1889 | 28.85 % change on previous year | -418.2% |
| 1890 | 22.75 % change on previous year | -21.2% |
| 1891 | 6.31 % change on previous year | -72.3% |
| 1892 | -8.98 % change on previous year | -242.4% |
| 1893 | -3.76 % change on previous year | -58.2% |
| 1894 | 5.04 % change on previous year | -234.0% |
| 1895 | 1.16 % change on previous year | -77.0% |
| 1896 | 18.71 % change on previous year | +1518.5% |
| 1897 | 66.05 % change on previous year | +253.0% |
| 1898 | -9.58 % change on previous year | -114.5% |
| 1899 | 54.76 % change on previous year | -671.8% |
| 1900 | -22.04 % change on previous year | -140.2% |
| 1901 | -29.07 % change on previous year | +31.9% |
| 1902 | -3.22 % change on previous year | -88.9% |
| 1903 | 20.33 % change on previous year | -732.1% |
| 1904 | -0.8892 % change on previous year | -104.4% |
| 1905 | 9.31 % change on previous year | -1147.2% |
| 1906 | 1 % change on previous year | -89.2% |
| 1907 | 39.29 % change on previous year | +3821.3% |
| 1908 | 56.89 % change on previous year | +44.8% |
| 1909 | -12.68 % change on previous year | -122.3% |
| 1910 | -18.94 % change on previous year | +49.3% |
| 1911 | 20.31 % change on previous year | -207.3% |
| 1912 | 6.89 % change on previous year | -66.1% |
| 1913 | 6.34 % change on previous year | -8.0% |
| 1914 | -56.69 % change on previous year | -994.2% |
| 1915 | -83.76 % change on previous year | +47.7% |
| 1916 | 66.82 % change on previous year | -179.8% |
| 1917 | -19.86 % change on previous year | -129.7% |
| 1918 | -30.09 % change on previous year | +51.5% |
| 1919 | 169.25 % change on previous year | -662.4% |
| 1920 | 3.13 % change on previous year | -98.2% |
| 1921 | -0.5927 % change on previous year | -118.9% |
| 1922 | 127.8 % change on previous year | -21662.4% |
| 1923 | 93.47 % change on previous year | -26.9% |
| 1924 | 15.12 % change on previous year | -83.8% |
| 1925 | -7.19 % change on previous year | -147.5% |
| 1926 | -10.09 % change on previous year | +40.4% |
| 1927 | 65.49 % change on previous year | -749.2% |
| 1928 | 2.8 % change on previous year | -95.7% |
| 1929 | 5.88 % change on previous year | +110.1% |
| 1930 | -20.06 % change on previous year | -441.3% |
| 1931 | 16.55 % change on previous year | -182.5% |
| 1932 | 0.7931 % change on previous year | -95.2% |
| 1933 | 0.017 % change on previous year | -97.9% |
| 1934 | 10.15 % change on previous year | +59756.6% |
| 1935 | -14.7 % change on previous year | -244.8% |
| 1936 | 32.21 % change on previous year | -319.1% |
| 1937 | 29.29 % change on previous year | -9.1% |
| 1938 | -20.13 % change on previous year | -168.7% |
| 1939 | -10.66 % change on previous year | -47.0% |
| 1940 | -49.88 % change on previous year | +367.7% |
| 1941 | 35.77 % change on previous year | -171.7% |
| 1942 | -13.69 % change on previous year | -138.3% |
| 1943 | 25.92 % change on previous year | -289.3% |
| 1944 | -30.96 % change on previous year | -219.4% |
| 1945 | -75.07 % change on previous year | +142.5% |
| 1946 | 374.15 % change on previous year | -598.4% |
| 1947 | 62.31 % change on previous year | -83.3% |
| 1948 | 43.81 % change on previous year | -29.7% |
| 1949 | -45.02 % change on previous year | -202.8% |
| 1950 | 27.77 % change on previous year | -161.7% |
| 1951 | 12.32 % change on previous year | -55.6% |
| 1952 | 5.04 % change on previous year | -59.1% |
| 1953 | -13.24 % change on previous year | -362.9% |
| 1954 | 11.26 % change on previous year | -185.1% |
| 1955 | 13.59 % change on previous year | +20.6% |
| 1956 | 8.11 % change on previous year | -40.3% |
| 1957 | -3.95 % change on previous year | -148.7% |
| 1958 | -13.8 % change on previous year | +249.4% |
| 1959 | 20.63 % change on previous year | -249.5% |
| 1960 | 1.95 % change on previous year | -90.5% |
| 1961 | -8.1 % change on previous year | -514.6% |
| 1962 | 9.15 % change on previous year | -212.9% |
| 1963 | 11.47 % change on previous year | +25.3% |
| 1964 | 12.39 % change on previous year | +8.0% |
| 1965 | 5.21 % change on previous year | -57.9% |
| 1966 | 13.84 % change on previous year | +165.4% |
| 1967 | -5.07 % change on previous year | -136.6% |
| 1968 | 13.8 % change on previous year | -372.2% |
| 1969 | 3.86 % change on previous year | -72.0% |
| 1970 | -0.9165 % change on previous year | -123.7% |
| 1971 | -1.6 % change on previous year | +75.0% |
| 1972 | 1.09 % change on previous year | -167.8% |
| 1973 | 4.8 % change on previous year | +341.8% |
| 1974 | -8.28 % change on previous year | -272.4% |
| 1975 | -2.38 % change on previous year | -71.3% |
| 1976 | 11.72 % change on previous year | -592.9% |
| 1977 | -2.33 % change on previous year | -119.8% |
| 1978 | 1.25 % change on previous year | -153.9% |
| 1979 | -2.16 % change on previous year | -272.1% |
| 1980 | 1.78 % change on previous year | -182.5% |
| 1981 | -13.21 % change on previous year | -842.5% |
| 1982 | -19.02 % change on previous year | +44.0% |
| 1983 | -6.06 % change on previous year | -68.1% |
| 1984 | -1.33 % change on previous year | -78.1% |
| 1985 | 13.73 % change on previous year | -1133.3% |
| 1986 | 4.92 % change on previous year | -64.2% |
| 1987 | 3.85 % change on previous year | -21.8% |
| 1988 | -13.75 % change on previous year | -457.4% |
| 1989 | -4.65 % change on previous year | -66.2% |
| 1990 | 8.51 % change on previous year | -283.0% |
| 1991 | 2.99 % change on previous year | -64.9% |
| 1992 | 1.63 % change on previous year | -45.4% |
| 1993 | 4.46 % change on previous year | +173.6% |
| 1994 | 5.39 % change on previous year | +20.8% |
| 1995 | -9.73 % change on previous year | -280.4% |
| 1996 | 6.21 % change on previous year | -163.8% |
| 1997 | -7.92 % change on previous year | -227.5% |
| 1998 | -10.27 % change on previous year | +29.8% |
| 1999 | -5.11 % change on previous year | -50.3% |
| 2000 | -8.39 % change on previous year | +64.3% |
| 2001 | 6.81 % change on previous year | -181.2% |
| 2002 | 2.25 % change on previous year | -67.0% |
| 2003 | 9.43 % change on previous year | +319.1% |
| 2004 | -8.76 % change on previous year | -192.9% |
| 2005 | -19.53 % change on previous year | +122.9% |
| 2006 | 15.06 % change on previous year | -177.1% |
| 2007 | -7.24 % change on previous year | -148.0% |
| 2008 | -12.88 % change on previous year | +78.1% |
| 2009 | 3.91 % change on previous year | -130.3% |
| 2010 | 11.2 % change on previous year | +186.5% |
| 2011 | -13.9 % change on previous year | -224.1% |
| 2012 | -8.42 % change on previous year | -39.4% |
| 2013 | 2.02 % change on previous year | -124.1% |
| 2014 | -7.58 % change on previous year | -474.6% |
| 2015 | -7.7 % change on previous year | +1.6% |
| 2016 | 4 % change on previous year | -151.9% |
| 2017 | -8.42 % change on previous year | -310.4% |
| 2018 | 1.26 % change on previous year | -115.0% |
| 2019 | -8.32 % change on previous year | -759.2% |
| 2020 | -8.99 % change on previous year | +8.0% |
| 2021 | -2.7 % change on previous year | -70.0% |
| 2022 | -5.88 % change on previous year | +117.9% |
Finland compared with similar countries
- Finland's -5.88 % change on previous year is below the median for high income countries, which is -4.8 % change on previous year, 1.2× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Finland's -5.88 % change on previous year is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -5.31 % change on previous year, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Finland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1934 | +59756.6% | 0.017 % change on previous year | 10.15 % change on previous year |
| 1922 | +21662.4% | -0.5927 % change on previous year | 127.8 % change on previous year |
| 1907 | +3821.3% | 1 % change on previous year | 39.29 % change on previous year |
| 1896 | +1518.5% | 1.16 % change on previous year | 18.71 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 11.43 % change on previous year | -39.46 % change on previous year | 97.53 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1870s | 2.59 % change on previous year | -40.61 % change on previous year | 38.46 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 8.04 % change on previous year | -44.47 % change on previous year | 50.2 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 15.24 % change on previous year | -9.58 % change on previous year | 66.05 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 5.89 % change on previous year | -29.07 % change on previous year | 56.89 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 6.03 % change on previous year | -83.76 % change on previous year | 169.25 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 29.58 % change on previous year | -10.09 % change on previous year | 127.8 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 2.35 % change on previous year | -20.13 % change on previous year | 32.21 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 32.74 % change on previous year | -75.07 % change on previous year | 374.15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 6.77 % change on previous year | -13.8 % change on previous year | 27.77 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 5.85 % change on previous year | -8.1 % change on previous year | 13.84 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.1205 % change on previous year | -8.28 % change on previous year | 11.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -3.37 % change on previous year | -19.02 % change on previous year | 13.73 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.3827 % change on previous year | -10.27 % change on previous year | 8.51 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.93 % change on previous year | -19.53 % change on previous year | 15.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -3.59 % change on previous year | -13.9 % change on previous year | 11.2 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -5.86 % change on previous year | -8.99 % change on previous year | -2.7 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 119 Romania -5.5 % change on previous year compare
- 120 Singapore -5.76 % change on previous year compare
- 121 Taiwan -5.77 % change on previous year compare
- 123 Brazil -6.05 % change on previous year compare
- 124 Bosnia and Herzegovina -6.13 % change on previous year compare
- 125 Sierra Leone -6.22 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Finland
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 146.49 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,084 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 626.14 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,457 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 87.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,068 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,062 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.16 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 4.01 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Finland?
- Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Finland was -5.88 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 374.15 % change on previous year in 1946.
- What is the lowest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was -83.76 % change on previous year in 1915.
- How does Finland rank for co2 intensity, annual growth rate?
- Finland ranks 122nd out of 164 countries with data for 2022.
- Is co2 intensity, annual growth rate rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 30.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Co2 intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 162 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Co2 intensity Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.