Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Netherlands
Netherlands: Co2 intensity, annual growth rate was -12.76 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2022)
-12.76 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 388.7%
World rank
155th
of 164 countries
All-time high
78.99 % change on previous year
in 1918
All-time low
-58.73 % change on previous year
in 1917
Years of data
176
1847–2022
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Netherlands, 1847–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2022, co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Netherlands stood at -12.76 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 388.7% on the previous year and down 1,056.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Netherlands peaked at 78.99 % change on previous year in 1918 and was at its lowest, -58.73 % change on previous year, in 1917.
Netherlands ranks 155th of 164 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Netherlands, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1847 | 33.87 % change on previous year | — |
| 1848 | -7.11 % change on previous year | -121.0% |
| 1849 | -11.57 % change on previous year | +62.6% |
| 1850 | -8.23 % change on previous year | -28.9% |
| 1851 | -3.1 % change on previous year | -62.3% |
| 1852 | 20.77 % change on previous year | -769.0% |
| 1853 | 12.42 % change on previous year | -40.2% |
| 1854 | 33.38 % change on previous year | +168.7% |
| 1855 | -20.05 % change on previous year | -160.1% |
| 1856 | -2.87 % change on previous year | -85.7% |
| 1857 | -9.77 % change on previous year | +240.2% |
| 1858 | -10.07 % change on previous year | +3.0% |
| 1859 | -1.74 % change on previous year | -82.7% |
| 1860 | 29.32 % change on previous year | -1787.6% |
| 1861 | -6.21 % change on previous year | -121.2% |
| 1862 | 22.98 % change on previous year | -469.8% |
| 1863 | -29.93 % change on previous year | -230.2% |
| 1864 | -20.68 % change on previous year | -30.9% |
| 1865 | 11.91 % change on previous year | -157.6% |
| 1866 | 4.91 % change on previous year | -58.8% |
| 1867 | -1.54 % change on previous year | -131.3% |
| 1868 | 3.29 % change on previous year | -314.1% |
| 1869 | -1.01 % change on previous year | -130.6% |
| 1870 | 8.54 % change on previous year | -948.2% |
| 1871 | 1.35 % change on previous year | -84.2% |
| 1872 | 5.1 % change on previous year | +277.7% |
| 1873 | -5.69 % change on previous year | -211.5% |
| 1874 | -6.16 % change on previous year | +8.3% |
| 1875 | 6.91 % change on previous year | -212.2% |
| 1876 | 13.02 % change on previous year | +88.4% |
| 1877 | -0.9487 % change on previous year | -107.3% |
| 1878 | 7.66 % change on previous year | -907.5% |
| 1879 | 8.96 % change on previous year | +17.0% |
| 1880 | 3.12 % change on previous year | -65.2% |
| 1881 | -0.7945 % change on previous year | -125.4% |
| 1882 | -1.32 % change on previous year | +65.9% |
| 1883 | 3.1 % change on previous year | -335.0% |
| 1884 | -1.63 % change on previous year | -152.6% |
| 1885 | 2.2 % change on previous year | -235.1% |
| 1886 | 0.5289 % change on previous year | -76.0% |
| 1887 | -0.7267 % change on previous year | -237.4% |
| 1888 | 9.45 % change on previous year | -1400.4% |
| 1889 | -5.58 % change on previous year | -159.0% |
| 1890 | 0.9738 % change on previous year | -117.5% |
| 1891 | 15.5 % change on previous year | +1491.5% |
| 1892 | -7.65 % change on previous year | -149.4% |
| 1893 | 2.34 % change on previous year | -130.6% |
| 1894 | -4.24 % change on previous year | -281.1% |
| 1895 | -0.5235 % change on previous year | -87.6% |
| 1896 | 3.17 % change on previous year | -705.2% |
| 1897 | 2.22 % change on previous year | -30.0% |
| 1898 | -2.81 % change on previous year | -226.5% |
| 1899 | 1.23 % change on previous year | -143.9% |
| 1900 | 11.31 % change on previous year | +818.1% |
| 1901 | -6.79 % change on previous year | -160.1% |
| 1902 | -4.23 % change on previous year | -37.8% |
| 1903 | 6.93 % change on previous year | -264.1% |
| 1904 | 4.17 % change on previous year | -39.9% |
| 1905 | -2.27 % change on previous year | -154.4% |
| 1906 | 6.59 % change on previous year | -390.8% |
| 1907 | 4.71 % change on previous year | -28.6% |
| 1908 | -0.1269 % change on previous year | -102.7% |
| 1909 | -0.0747 % change on previous year | -41.1% |
| 1910 | 0.4829 % change on previous year | -746.6% |
| 1911 | 2.7 % change on previous year | +459.4% |
| 1912 | 9.76 % change on previous year | +261.5% |
| 1913 | 5.3 % change on previous year | -45.8% |
| 1914 | -3.65 % change on previous year | -169.0% |
| 1915 | -8.12 % change on previous year | +122.3% |
| 1916 | -11.08 % change on previous year | +36.5% |
| 1917 | -58.73 % change on previous year | +429.8% |
| 1918 | 78.99 % change on previous year | -234.5% |
| 1919 | 22.08 % change on previous year | -72.0% |
| 1920 | -2.11 % change on previous year | -109.5% |
| 1921 | -1.25 % change on previous year | -40.9% |
| 1922 | 11.3 % change on previous year | -1007.6% |
| 1923 | -2.67 % change on previous year | -123.6% |
| 1924 | 4.83 % change on previous year | -281.0% |
| 1925 | 5.36 % change on previous year | +10.9% |
| 1926 | -5.4 % change on previous year | -200.8% |
| 1927 | 6.18 % change on previous year | -214.4% |
| 1928 | -4.97 % change on previous year | -180.5% |
| 1929 | 7.73 % change on previous year | -255.5% |
| 1930 | -0.9631 % change on previous year | -112.5% |
| 1931 | 17.41 % change on previous year | -1908.1% |
| 1932 | -6.58 % change on previous year | -137.8% |
| 1933 | -6.7 % change on previous year | +1.8% |
| 1934 | 2.01 % change on previous year | -130.1% |
| 1935 | -7 % change on previous year | -447.2% |
| 1936 | 0.6875 % change on previous year | -109.8% |
| 1937 | 4.35 % change on previous year | +532.7% |
| 1938 | 0.852 % change on previous year | -80.4% |
| 1939 | -11.99 % change on previous year | -1507.0% |
| 1940 | -6.76 % change on previous year | -43.6% |
| 1941 | 17.24 % change on previous year | -355.2% |
| 1942 | 1.94 % change on previous year | -88.7% |
| 1943 | 3.45 % change on previous year | +77.7% |
| 1944 | -0.3668 % change on previous year | -110.6% |
| 1945 | -38.66 % change on previous year | +10438.6% |
| 1946 | 25.72 % change on previous year | -166.5% |
| 1947 | 23.91 % change on previous year | -7.0% |
| 1948 | -4.26 % change on previous year | -117.8% |
| 1949 | -1.81 % change on previous year | -57.6% |
| 1950 | -1.93 % change on previous year | +6.7% |
| 1951 | 4.98 % change on previous year | -358.3% |
| 1952 | -2.43 % change on previous year | -148.8% |
| 1953 | -7.08 % change on previous year | +191.4% |
| 1954 | -1.06 % change on previous year | -85.1% |
| 1955 | -2.77 % change on previous year | +162.9% |
| 1956 | 2.93 % change on previous year | -205.5% |
| 1957 | -3.74 % change on previous year | -227.9% |
| 1958 | 3.86 % change on previous year | -203.2% |
| 1959 | -4.06 % change on previous year | -205.1% |
| 1960 | 0.9264 % change on previous year | -122.8% |
| 1961 | 2.93 % change on previous year | +216.7% |
| 1962 | 2.82 % change on previous year | -3.9% |
| 1963 | 5.61 % change on previous year | +99.0% |
| 1964 | -1.95 % change on previous year | -134.8% |
| 1965 | -1.42 % change on previous year | -27.4% |
| 1966 | 0.3751 % change on previous year | -126.4% |
| 1967 | -2.13 % change on previous year | -667.8% |
| 1968 | -0.0761 % change on previous year | -96.4% |
| 1969 | -4.1 % change on previous year | +5288.2% |
| 1970 | 15.85 % change on previous year | -486.7% |
| 1971 | -4.82 % change on previous year | -130.4% |
| 1972 | 8.38 % change on previous year | -273.8% |
| 1973 | 0.2289 % change on previous year | -97.3% |
| 1974 | -6.88 % change on previous year | -3106.9% |
| 1975 | -4.58 % change on previous year | -33.4% |
| 1976 | 5.9 % change on previous year | -228.8% |
| 1977 | -5.83 % change on previous year | -198.7% |
| 1978 | 1.39 % change on previous year | -123.8% |
| 1979 | 7.74 % change on previous year | +457.8% |
| 1980 | -6.67 % change on previous year | -186.2% |
| 1981 | -6.62 % change on previous year | -0.8% |
| 1982 | -17.7 % change on previous year | +167.4% |
| 1983 | 1.17 % change on previous year | -106.6% |
| 1984 | 1.55 % change on previous year | +32.4% |
| 1985 | -1.03 % change on previous year | -166.7% |
| 1986 | -4.64 % change on previous year | +350.3% |
| 1987 | 3.72 % change on previous year | -180.1% |
| 1988 | -6.33 % change on previous year | -270.4% |
| 1989 | 6.07 % change on previous year | -195.9% |
| 1990 | -3.13 % change on previous year | -151.6% |
| 1991 | 2.06 % change on previous year | -165.8% |
| 1992 | -2.35 % change on previous year | -214.1% |
| 1993 | -1.87 % change on previous year | -20.3% |
| 1994 | -2.99 % change on previous year | +59.7% |
| 1995 | -2.74 % change on previous year | -8.4% |
| 1996 | 1.02 % change on previous year | -137.1% |
| 1997 | -8.37 % change on previous year | -923.9% |
| 1998 | -4.37 % change on previous year | -47.8% |
| 1999 | -8.22 % change on previous year | +88.1% |
| 2000 | -4.01 % change on previous year | -51.3% |
| 2001 | 0.3641 % change on previous year | -109.1% |
| 2002 | -1.09 % change on previous year | -398.7% |
| 2003 | 1.07 % change on previous year | -198.3% |
| 2004 | -1.52 % change on previous year | -241.9% |
| 2005 | -4.8 % change on previous year | +216.1% |
| 2006 | -6.57 % change on previous year | +37.0% |
| 2007 | -4.26 % change on previous year | -35.1% |
| 2008 | -0.6127 % change on previous year | -85.6% |
| 2009 | 0.109 % change on previous year | -117.8% |
| 2010 | 4.98 % change on previous year | +4465.8% |
| 2011 | -9.24 % change on previous year | -285.7% |
| 2012 | -1.1 % change on previous year | -88.1% |
| 2013 | -0.3686 % change on previous year | -66.6% |
| 2014 | -5.84 % change on previous year | +1484.7% |
| 2015 | 2.1 % change on previous year | -135.9% |
| 2016 | -1.63 % change on previous year | -177.9% |
| 2017 | -4.31 % change on previous year | +163.8% |
| 2018 | -4.73 % change on previous year | +9.8% |
| 2019 | -5.35 % change on previous year | +13.0% |
| 2020 | -6.69 % change on previous year | +25.0% |
| 2021 | -2.61 % change on previous year | -61.0% |
| 2022 | -12.76 % change on previous year | +388.7% |
Netherlands compared with similar countries
- Netherlands's -12.76 % change on previous year is below the median for high income countries, which is -4.8 % change on previous year, 2.7× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Netherlands's -12.76 % change on previous year is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -5.31 % change on previous year, 2.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Netherlands changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1945 | -10438.6% | -0.3668 % change on previous year | -38.66 % change on previous year |
| 1969 | -5288.2% | -0.0761 % change on previous year | -4.1 % change on previous year |
| 2010 | +4465.8% | 0.109 % change on previous year | 4.98 % change on previous year |
| 1974 | -3106.9% | 0.2289 % change on previous year | -6.88 % change on previous year |
| 1931 | +1908.1% | -0.9631 % change on previous year | 17.41 % change on previous year |
| 1860 | +1787.6% | -1.74 % change on previous year | 29.32 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 5.06 % change on previous year | -11.57 % change on previous year | 33.87 % change on previous year | 3 |
| 1850s | 1.07 % change on previous year | -20.05 % change on previous year | 33.38 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.31 % change on previous year | -29.93 % change on previous year | 29.32 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 3.87 % change on previous year | -6.16 % change on previous year | 13.02 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.8353 % change on previous year | -5.58 % change on previous year | 9.45 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.02 % change on previous year | -7.65 % change on previous year | 15.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 2.02 % change on previous year | -6.79 % change on previous year | 11.31 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 3.77 % change on previous year | -58.73 % change on previous year | 78.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.9 % change on previous year | -5.4 % change on previous year | 11.3 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.7906 % change on previous year | -11.99 % change on previous year | 17.41 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.04 % change on previous year | -38.66 % change on previous year | 25.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.13 % change on previous year | -7.08 % change on previous year | 4.98 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.2985 % change on previous year | -4.1 % change on previous year | 5.61 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.74 % change on previous year | -6.88 % change on previous year | 15.85 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -3.05 % change on previous year | -17.7 % change on previous year | 6.07 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -3.1 % change on previous year | -8.37 % change on previous year | 2.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -2.13 % change on previous year | -6.57 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -2.55 % change on previous year | -9.24 % change on previous year | 4.98 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -7.35 % change on previous year | -12.76 % change on previous year | -2.61 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Netherlands
- 152 Saudi Arabia -11.8 % change on previous year compare
- 153 Slovakia -11.86 % change on previous year compare
- 154 United Kingdom -12.71 % change on previous year compare
- 156 Nigeria -13.86 % change on previous year compare
- 157 Cape Verde -13.93 % change on previous year compare
- 158 Luxembourg -14.82 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Netherlands
- Share co2 vs population 0.172 (2100)
- Co2 gdp growth, annual growth rate 66.19 % change on previous year (2025)
- Co2 gdp pop growth, annual growth rate -19.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, annual growth rate 0.523 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, annual growth rate 0.8374 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, per capita 0.9594 units per person (2025)
- Precipitation anomalies, annual growth rate -175.91 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population 95.9% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Netherlands?
- Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Netherlands was -12.76 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Netherlands?
- The highest recorded value was 78.99 % change on previous year in 1918.
- What is the lowest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Netherlands?
- The lowest recorded value was -58.73 % change on previous year in 1917.
- How does Netherlands rank for co2 intensity, annual growth rate?
- Netherlands ranks 155th out of 164 countries with data for 2022.
- Is co2 intensity, annual growth rate rising or falling in Netherlands?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1,056.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Netherlands data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Co2 intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 176 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Co2 intensity Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.