Co2 land use per capita in Cuba
Cuba: Co2 land use per capita was -0.0088 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-0.0088
Change on year
up 88.1%
World rank
133rd
of 194 countries
All-time high
26.04
in 1963
All-time low
-1.69
in 2011
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Co2 land use per capita in Cuba, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 land use per capita in Cuba is -0.0088, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 88.1% on the previous year and up 99.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 land use per capita in Cuba peaked at 26.04 in 1963 and was at its lowest, -1.69, in 2011.
That places Cuba 133rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 land use per capita in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 4.08 | — |
| 1851 | 3.41 | -16.5% |
| 1852 | 3.03 | -11.0% |
| 1853 | 2.79 | -8.0% |
| 1854 | 2.61 | -6.4% |
| 1855 | 2.47 | -5.3% |
| 1856 | 2.35 | -4.9% |
| 1857 | 2.26 | -4.1% |
| 1858 | 2.17 | -3.6% |
| 1859 | 2.1 | -3.3% |
| 1860 | 2.04 | -3.0% |
| 1861 | 2 | -2.1% |
| 1862 | 1.97 | -1.3% |
| 1863 | 1.96 | -0.6% |
| 1864 | 1.95 | -0.5% |
| 1865 | 1.94 | -0.4% |
| 1866 | 1.95 | +0.4% |
| 1867 | 1.93 | -1.0% |
| 1868 | 1.93 | -0.1% |
| 1869 | 1.92 | -0.1% |
| 1870 | 2.08 | +8.3% |
| 1871 | 2.13 | +2.2% |
| 1872 | 2.14 | +0.4% |
| 1873 | 2.13 | -0.4% |
| 1874 | 2.12 | -0.7% |
| 1875 | 2.1 | -0.9% |
| 1876 | 2.08 | -1.0% |
| 1877 | 2.05 | -1.1% |
| 1878 | 2.03 | -1.0% |
| 1879 | 2.01 | -1.1% |
| 1880 | 2.05 | +1.9% |
| 1881 | 2.06 | +0.4% |
| 1882 | 2.05 | -0.3% |
| 1883 | 2.05 | -0.2% |
| 1884 | 2.05 | -0.2% |
| 1885 | 2.04 | -0.3% |
| 1886 | 2.03 | -0.4% |
| 1887 | 2.02 | -0.4% |
| 1888 | 2.01 | -0.4% |
| 1889 | 2.01 | -0.3% |
| 1890 | 2.04 | +1.8% |
| 1891 | 2.06 | +0.6% |
| 1892 | 2.06 | +0.3% |
| 1893 | 2.06 | +0.1% |
| 1894 | 2.07 | +0.4% |
| 1895 | 2.08 | +0.3% |
| 1896 | 2.08 | +0.2% |
| 1897 | 2.08 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | 2.08 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | 2.08 | -0.2% |
| 1900 | 5.02 | +141.9% |
| 1901 | 6.07 | +20.8% |
| 1902 | 6.54 | +7.7% |
| 1903 | 6.74 | +3.1% |
| 1904 | 6.83 | +1.3% |
| 1905 | 6.83 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 6.8 | -0.5% |
| 1907 | 6.73 | -1.0% |
| 1908 | 6.65 | -1.3% |
| 1909 | 6.55 | -1.5% |
| 1910 | 8.08 | +23.4% |
| 1911 | 8.52 | +5.5% |
| 1912 | 8.66 | +1.6% |
| 1913 | 8.66 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 8.6 | -0.7% |
| 1915 | 8.49 | -1.2% |
| 1916 | 8.36 | -1.6% |
| 1917 | 8.22 | -1.7% |
| 1918 | 8.06 | -1.9% |
| 1919 | 7.91 | -1.9% |
| 1920 | 8.12 | +2.7% |
| 1921 | 8.09 | -0.3% |
| 1922 | 8 | -1.1% |
| 1923 | 7.88 | -1.4% |
| 1924 | 7.75 | -1.7% |
| 1925 | 7.6 | -1.9% |
| 1926 | 7.46 | -1.9% |
| 1927 | 7.31 | -2.0% |
| 1928 | 7.15 | -2.1% |
| 1929 | 7.01 | -2.0% |
| 1930 | 5.23 | -25.4% |
| 1931 | 4.52 | -13.7% |
| 1932 | 4.11 | -9.0% |
| 1933 | 3.84 | -6.6% |
| 1934 | 3.63 | -5.4% |
| 1935 | 3.47 | -4.6% |
| 1936 | 3.33 | -4.0% |
| 1937 | 3.21 | -3.6% |
| 1938 | 3.1 | -3.3% |
| 1939 | 3 | -3.2% |
| 1940 | 6.14 | +104.3% |
| 1941 | 7.2 | +17.4% |
| 1942 | 7.67 | +6.5% |
| 1943 | 7.88 | +2.7% |
| 1944 | 7.96 | +1.0% |
| 1945 | 7.96 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 7.92 | -0.6% |
| 1947 | 7.84 | -0.9% |
| 1948 | 7.75 | -1.2% |
| 1949 | 7.64 | -1.3% |
| 1950 | 11.72 | +53.4% |
| 1951 | 11.06 | -5.7% |
| 1952 | 22.52 | +103.7% |
| 1953 | 10.66 | -52.6% |
| 1954 | 8.44 | -20.8% |
| 1955 | 5.5 | -34.9% |
| 1956 | 3.98 | -27.6% |
| 1957 | 3.02 | -24.1% |
| 1958 | 3.12 | +3.3% |
| 1959 | 2.31 | -25.9% |
| 1960 | 1.58 | -31.6% |
| 1961 | 8.75 | +453.5% |
| 1962 | 11.26 | +28.6% |
| 1963 | 26.04 | +131.3% |
| 1964 | 10.47 | -59.8% |
| 1965 | 5.4 | -48.4% |
| 1966 | 8.07 | +49.4% |
| 1967 | 9.5 | +17.7% |
| 1968 | 7.09 | -25.4% |
| 1969 | 12.79 | +80.4% |
| 1970 | 7.6 | -40.6% |
| 1971 | 18.27 | +140.4% |
| 1972 | 15.52 | -15.0% |
| 1973 | 7.13 | -54.0% |
| 1974 | 8.93 | +25.2% |
| 1975 | 9.6 | +7.5% |
| 1976 | 5.78 | -39.8% |
| 1977 | 3.44 | -40.4% |
| 1978 | 2.25 | -34.8% |
| 1979 | 2.98 | +32.7% |
| 1980 | 2.06 | -30.8% |
| 1981 | 4.34 | +110.5% |
| 1982 | 4.3 | -1.0% |
| 1983 | 2.71 | -36.8% |
| 1984 | 3.51 | +29.3% |
| 1985 | 6.52 | +85.8% |
| 1986 | 8.6 | +31.9% |
| 1987 | 5.59 | -35.0% |
| 1988 | 3.22 | -42.4% |
| 1989 | 2.35 | -26.9% |
| 1990 | 2.15 | -8.8% |
| 1991 | 3.45 | +60.5% |
| 1992 | 2.07 | -40.1% |
| 1993 | 1.53 | -25.9% |
| 1994 | 1.54 | +0.5% |
| 1995 | 0.5178 | -66.4% |
| 1996 | 2.81 | +442.7% |
| 1997 | 1.16 | -58.6% |
| 1998 | 1.48 | +27.1% |
| 1999 | 0.4801 | -67.6% |
| 2000 | 3.14 | +553.4% |
| 2001 | 1.29 | -58.9% |
| 2002 | 0.459 | -64.4% |
| 2003 | 0.1164 | -74.6% |
| 2004 | 1.16 | +896.0% |
| 2005 | 0.3447 | -70.3% |
| 2006 | -0.1705 | -149.5% |
| 2007 | -0.4097 | +140.3% |
| 2008 | -0.6075 | +48.3% |
| 2009 | -0.7472 | +23.0% |
| 2010 | -0.8289 | +10.9% |
| 2011 | -1.69 | +104.1% |
| 2012 | -0.8455 | -50.0% |
| 2013 | -0.9644 | +14.1% |
| 2014 | -0.8567 | -11.2% |
| 2015 | -1.01 | +17.4% |
| 2016 | 0.5708 | -156.7% |
| 2017 | -0.1358 | -123.8% |
| 2018 | 0.719 | -629.6% |
| 2019 | -0.0442 | -106.1% |
| 2020 | -0.2828 | +540.0% |
| 2021 | -0.383 | +35.4% |
| 2022 | -0.1673 | -56.3% |
| 2023 | -0.0742 | -55.7% |
| 2024 | -0.0088 | -88.1% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's -0.0088 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0027. (58 countries reporting)
- Cuba's -0.0088 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0312. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 land use per capita in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | +896.0% | 0.1164 | 1.16 |
| 2018 | +629.6% | -0.1358 | 0.719 |
| 2000 | +553.4% | 0.4801 | 3.14 |
| 2020 | -540.0% | -0.0442 | -0.2828 |
| 1961 | +453.5% | 1.58 | 8.75 |
| 1996 | +442.7% | 0.5178 | 2.81 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 2.73 | 2.1 | 4.08 | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.96 | 1.92 | 2.04 | 10 |
| 1870s | 2.09 | 2.01 | 2.14 | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.04 | 2.01 | 2.06 | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.07 | 2.04 | 2.08 | 10 |
| 1900s | 6.48 | 5.02 | 6.83 | 10 |
| 1910s | 8.36 | 7.91 | 8.66 | 10 |
| 1920s | 7.64 | 7.01 | 8.12 | 10 |
| 1930s | 3.74 | 3 | 5.23 | 10 |
| 1940s | 7.6 | 6.14 | 7.96 | 10 |
| 1950s | 8.23 | 2.31 | 22.52 | 10 |
| 1960s | 10.1 | 1.58 | 26.04 | 10 |
| 1970s | 8.15 | 2.25 | 18.27 | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.32 | 2.06 | 8.6 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.72 | 0.4801 | 3.45 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.4571 | -0.7472 | 3.14 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.5083 | -1.69 | 0.719 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.1832 | -0.383 | -0.0088 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 132 Israel -0.0041 compare
- 134 Switzerland -0.0143 compare
- 135 Uzbekistan -0.0218 compare
- 136 Libya -0.0276 compare
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 land use per capita in Cuba?
- Co2 land use per capita in Cuba was -0.0088 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 land use per capita recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 26.04 in 1963.
- What is the lowest co2 land use per capita recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.69 in 2011.
- How does Cuba rank for co2 land use per capita?
- Cuba ranks 133rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 land use per capita rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 99.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).