Co2 land use per capita in Lithuania
Lithuania: Co2 land use per capita was -0.2398 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-0.2398
Change on year
up 35.6%
World rank
163rd
of 194 countries
All-time high
17.84
in 1850
All-time low
-5.78
in 2002
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Co2 land use per capita in Lithuania, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 land use per capita in Lithuania is -0.2398, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 35.6% on the previous year and down 1.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 land use per capita in Lithuania peaked at 17.84 in 1850 and was at its lowest, -5.78, in 2002.
That places Lithuania 163rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 land use per capita in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 17.84 | — |
| 1851 | 17.69 | -0.8% |
| 1852 | 17.55 | -0.8% |
| 1853 | 17.14 | -2.3% |
| 1854 | 17.2 | +0.3% |
| 1855 | 16.95 | -1.5% |
| 1856 | 16.82 | -0.8% |
| 1857 | 16.6 | -1.3% |
| 1858 | 16.49 | -0.7% |
| 1859 | 16.46 | -0.2% |
| 1860 | 15.53 | -5.7% |
| 1861 | 15.05 | -3.1% |
| 1862 | 14.69 | -2.4% |
| 1863 | 14.53 | -1.1% |
| 1864 | 14.25 | -1.9% |
| 1865 | 13.8 | -3.1% |
| 1866 | 13.75 | -0.4% |
| 1867 | 13.48 | -1.9% |
| 1868 | 13.27 | -1.6% |
| 1869 | 13.07 | -1.5% |
| 1870 | 12.96 | -0.9% |
| 1871 | 12.75 | -1.6% |
| 1872 | 12.63 | -0.9% |
| 1873 | 12.29 | -2.7% |
| 1874 | 12.21 | -0.7% |
| 1875 | 12.04 | -1.4% |
| 1876 | 11.82 | -1.8% |
| 1877 | 11.63 | -1.6% |
| 1878 | 11.61 | -0.2% |
| 1879 | 11.42 | -1.6% |
| 1880 | 11.31 | -1.0% |
| 1881 | 11.1 | -1.9% |
| 1882 | 10.94 | -1.4% |
| 1883 | 10.89 | -0.4% |
| 1884 | 10.71 | -1.7% |
| 1885 | 10.52 | -1.8% |
| 1886 | 10.45 | -0.6% |
| 1887 | 10.36 | -0.9% |
| 1888 | 10.13 | -2.2% |
| 1889 | 10.08 | -0.5% |
| 1890 | 9.84 | -2.4% |
| 1891 | 9.67 | -1.8% |
| 1892 | 9.58 | -0.9% |
| 1893 | 9.39 | -1.9% |
| 1894 | 9.34 | -0.6% |
| 1895 | 9.19 | -1.6% |
| 1896 | 9.02 | -1.9% |
| 1897 | 8.93 | -1.0% |
| 1898 | 8.82 | -1.1% |
| 1899 | 8.78 | -0.5% |
| 1900 | 8.58 | -2.3% |
| 1901 | 8.48 | -1.1% |
| 1902 | 8.27 | -2.4% |
| 1903 | 8.15 | -1.5% |
| 1904 | 8.01 | -1.7% |
| 1905 | 7.98 | -0.4% |
| 1906 | 7.84 | -1.7% |
| 1907 | 7.69 | -1.9% |
| 1908 | 7.65 | -0.5% |
| 1909 | 7.66 | +0.1% |
| 1910 | 6.26 | -18.3% |
| 1911 | 5.92 | -5.4% |
| 1912 | 5.74 | -3.1% |
| 1913 | 5.62 | -2.0% |
| 1914 | 5.67 | +0.9% |
| 1915 | 5.6 | -1.3% |
| 1916 | 5.45 | -2.7% |
| 1917 | 5.51 | +1.1% |
| 1918 | 5.49 | -0.4% |
| 1919 | 5.33 | -2.9% |
| 1920 | 5.37 | +0.7% |
| 1921 | 5.23 | -2.5% |
| 1922 | 5.09 | -2.7% |
| 1923 | 4.87 | -4.3% |
| 1924 | 4.72 | -3.1% |
| 1925 | 4.57 | -3.1% |
| 1926 | 4.42 | -3.3% |
| 1927 | 4.27 | -3.5% |
| 1928 | 4.16 | -2.5% |
| 1929 | 4.11 | -1.3% |
| 1930 | 5.08 | +23.7% |
| 1931 | 5.51 | +8.5% |
| 1932 | 5.76 | +4.5% |
| 1933 | 5.92 | +2.7% |
| 1934 | 6.18 | +4.4% |
| 1935 | 6.24 | +1.0% |
| 1936 | 6.54 | +4.8% |
| 1937 | 6.61 | +1.1% |
| 1938 | 6.81 | +2.9% |
| 1939 | 6.87 | +0.9% |
| 1940 | 5.28 | -23.0% |
| 1941 | 4.61 | -12.7% |
| 1942 | 4.06 | -12.0% |
| 1943 | 3.53 | -13.0% |
| 1944 | 3.07 | -13.0% |
| 1945 | 2.58 | -16.1% |
| 1946 | 2.21 | -14.2% |
| 1947 | 1.83 | -17.4% |
| 1948 | 1.47 | -19.6% |
| 1949 | 1.2 | -18.6% |
| 1950 | 0.7734 | -35.3% |
| 1951 | 0.5725 | -26.0% |
| 1952 | 0.2788 | -51.3% |
| 1953 | -0.0041 | -101.5% |
| 1954 | -0.3577 | +8576.7% |
| 1955 | -0.5892 | +64.7% |
| 1956 | -0.988 | +67.7% |
| 1957 | -1.57 | +58.6% |
| 1958 | -2.54 | +62.3% |
| 1959 | -5.44 | +114.1% |
| 1960 | -5.21 | -4.3% |
| 1961 | -4.75 | -8.9% |
| 1962 | -4.71 | -0.7% |
| 1963 | -4.47 | -5.0% |
| 1964 | -4.2 | -6.0% |
| 1965 | -4.2 | -0.2% |
| 1966 | -3.94 | -6.1% |
| 1967 | -3.67 | -6.9% |
| 1968 | -3.34 | -9.1% |
| 1969 | -3.19 | -4.5% |
| 1970 | -3.01 | -5.4% |
| 1971 | -2.74 | -9.0% |
| 1972 | -2.58 | -6.0% |
| 1973 | -2.22 | -13.7% |
| 1974 | -2.21 | -0.9% |
| 1975 | -1.94 | -11.8% |
| 1976 | -1.78 | -8.3% |
| 1977 | -1.77 | -0.6% |
| 1978 | -1.7 | -4.2% |
| 1979 | -1.49 | -12.1% |
| 1980 | -1.35 | -9.5% |
| 1981 | -1.16 | -14.0% |
| 1982 | -1.06 | -8.5% |
| 1983 | -1.06 | -0.2% |
| 1984 | -0.9053 | -14.6% |
| 1985 | -0.8058 | -11.0% |
| 1986 | -0.7566 | -6.1% |
| 1987 | -0.7405 | -2.1% |
| 1988 | -0.7516 | +1.5% |
| 1989 | -0.7264 | -3.4% |
| 1990 | -0.6795 | -6.5% |
| 1991 | -0.4769 | -29.8% |
| 1992 | -0.4505 | -5.5% |
| 1993 | -1.59 | +254.0% |
| 1994 | 3.51 | -320.1% |
| 1995 | 0.5236 | -85.1% |
| 1996 | 0.1074 | -79.5% |
| 1997 | 0.0889 | -17.2% |
| 1998 | 1.22 | +1269.9% |
| 1999 | 1.45 | +19.4% |
| 2000 | -5.47 | -476.6% |
| 2001 | -4.64 | -15.3% |
| 2002 | -5.78 | +24.6% |
| 2003 | -4.24 | -26.7% |
| 2004 | -0.1617 | -96.2% |
| 2005 | -2.72 | +1581.9% |
| 2006 | -3.64 | +33.7% |
| 2007 | -3.51 | -3.3% |
| 2008 | -2.38 | -32.3% |
| 2009 | -1.12 | -53.0% |
| 2010 | -1.32 | +18.1% |
| 2011 | -0.9429 | -28.6% |
| 2012 | -0.4363 | -53.7% |
| 2013 | 0.3238 | -174.2% |
| 2014 | -0.2357 | -172.8% |
| 2015 | -1.14 | +382.3% |
| 2016 | -1.38 | +21.4% |
| 2017 | -0.9293 | -32.6% |
| 2018 | -0.0308 | -96.7% |
| 2019 | -0.6387 | +1975.4% |
| 2020 | -0.658 | +3.0% |
| 2021 | -0.8104 | +23.2% |
| 2022 | -0.523 | -35.5% |
| 2023 | -0.3723 | -28.8% |
| 2024 | -0.2398 | -35.6% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's -0.2398 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0.0731, 3.3× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 land use per capita in Lithuania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1954 | -8576.7% | -0.0041 | -0.3577 |
| 2019 | -1975.4% | -0.0308 | -0.6387 |
| 2005 | -1581.9% | -0.1617 | -2.72 |
| 1998 | +1269.9% | 0.0889 | 1.22 |
| 2000 | -476.6% | 1.45 | -5.47 |
| 2015 | -382.3% | -0.2357 | -1.14 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 17.07 | 16.46 | 17.84 | 10 |
| 1860s | 14.14 | 13.07 | 15.53 | 10 |
| 1870s | 12.13 | 11.42 | 12.96 | 10 |
| 1880s | 10.65 | 10.08 | 11.31 | 10 |
| 1890s | 9.26 | 8.78 | 9.84 | 10 |
| 1900s | 8.03 | 7.65 | 8.58 | 10 |
| 1910s | 5.66 | 5.33 | 6.26 | 10 |
| 1920s | 4.68 | 4.11 | 5.37 | 10 |
| 1930s | 6.15 | 5.08 | 6.87 | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.98 | 1.2 | 5.28 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.987 | -5.44 | 0.7734 | 10 |
| 1960s | -4.17 | -5.21 | -3.19 | 10 |
| 1970s | -2.14 | -3.01 | -1.49 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.9319 | -1.35 | -0.7264 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.37 | -1.59 | 3.51 | 10 |
| 2000s | -3.37 | -5.78 | -0.1617 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.6727 | -1.38 | 0.3238 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5207 | -0.8104 | -0.2398 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More climate change data for Lithuania
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 120.73 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,997 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 590.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,407 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.23 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 85.96 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 854.17 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 843.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.18 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 land use per capita in Lithuania?
- Co2 land use per capita in Lithuania was -0.2398 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 land use per capita recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 17.84 in 1850.
- What is the lowest co2 land use per capita recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was -5.78 in 2002.
- How does Lithuania rank for co2 land use per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 163rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 land use per capita rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).