Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity in Netherlands
Netherlands: Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity was 6.3 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
6.3
Change on year
down 2.6%
World rank
46th
of 213 countries
All-time high
13.31
in 1979
All-time low
0.9526
in 1846
Years of data
179
1846–2024
Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity in Netherlands, 1846–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Netherlands recorded 6.3 for co2 per capita vs renewable electricity in 2024.
That represents a change of down 2.6% on the previous year and down 31.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 per capita vs renewable electricity in Netherlands peaked at 13.31 in 1979 and was at its lowest, 0.9526, in 1846.
That places Netherlands 46th out of 213 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity in Netherlands, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1846 | 0.9526 | — |
| 1847 | 1.28 | +33.9% |
| 1848 | 1.19 | -6.3% |
| 1849 | 1.08 | -9.4% |
| 1850 | 1.01 | -6.5% |
| 1851 | 0.9996 | -1.3% |
| 1852 | 1.2 | +19.9% |
| 1853 | 1.32 | +10.1% |
| 1854 | 1.87 | +41.6% |
| 1855 | 1.45 | -22.3% |
| 1856 | 1.46 | +0.9% |
| 1857 | 1.3 | -11.3% |
| 1858 | 1.13 | -12.7% |
| 1859 | 1.07 | -5.6% |
| 1860 | 1.44 | +35.1% |
| 1861 | 1.32 | -8.9% |
| 1862 | 1.68 | +27.7% |
| 1863 | 1.2 | -28.6% |
| 1864 | 0.9922 | -17.4% |
| 1865 | 1.11 | +12.1% |
| 1866 | 1.21 | +8.7% |
| 1867 | 1.15 | -5.0% |
| 1868 | 1.19 | +4.0% |
| 1869 | 1.22 | +2.2% |
| 1870 | 1.37 | +12.0% |
| 1871 | 1.36 | -0.3% |
| 1872 | 1.44 | +5.9% |
| 1873 | 1.38 | -4.7% |
| 1874 | 1.26 | -8.8% |
| 1875 | 1.42 | +13.0% |
| 1876 | 1.61 | +13.3% |
| 1877 | 1.62 | +0.5% |
| 1878 | 1.69 | +4.8% |
| 1879 | 1.81 | +6.6% |
| 1880 | 1.97 | +9.3% |
| 1881 | 1.96 | -0.5% |
| 1882 | 1.97 | +0.1% |
| 1883 | 2.15 | +9.6% |
| 1884 | 2.13 | -1.1% |
| 1885 | 2.2 | +3.3% |
| 1886 | 2.22 | +0.9% |
| 1887 | 2.24 | +0.6% |
| 1888 | 2.45 | +9.7% |
| 1889 | 2.37 | -3.4% |
| 1890 | 2.27 | -4.2% |
| 1891 | 2.6 | +14.4% |
| 1892 | 2.44 | -6.1% |
| 1893 | 2.44 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | 2.44 | +0.1% |
| 1895 | 2.41 | -1.2% |
| 1896 | 2.56 | +6.1% |
| 1897 | 2.65 | +3.6% |
| 1898 | 2.58 | -2.5% |
| 1899 | 2.62 | +1.4% |
| 1900 | 2.85 | +8.8% |
| 1901 | 2.75 | -3.5% |
| 1902 | 2.71 | -1.4% |
| 1903 | 2.86 | +5.5% |
| 1904 | 2.98 | +4.2% |
| 1905 | 3.01 | +1.2% |
| 1906 | 3.23 | +7.3% |
| 1907 | 3.28 | +1.4% |
| 1908 | 3.29 | +0.4% |
| 1909 | 3.42 | +3.8% |
| 1910 | 3.52 | +3.1% |
| 1911 | 3.68 | +4.5% |
| 1912 | 4.09 | +11.3% |
| 1913 | 4.46 | +9.0% |
| 1914 | 4.12 | -7.6% |
| 1915 | 3.86 | -6.4% |
| 1916 | 3.47 | -10.0% |
| 1917 | 1.32 | -61.9% |
| 1918 | 2.19 | +65.4% |
| 1919 | 3.26 | +49.1% |
| 1920 | 3.24 | -0.6% |
| 1921 | 3.35 | +3.3% |
| 1922 | 3.88 | +15.7% |
| 1923 | 3.81 | -1.7% |
| 1924 | 4.23 | +10.9% |
| 1925 | 4.58 | +8.3% |
| 1926 | 4.61 | +0.8% |
| 1927 | 5.03 | +9.1% |
| 1928 | 4.97 | -1.3% |
| 1929 | 5.32 | +7.1% |
| 1930 | 5.19 | -2.5% |
| 1931 | 5.65 | +8.8% |
| 1932 | 5.14 | -9.0% |
| 1933 | 4.73 | -8.0% |
| 1934 | 4.68 | -1.0% |
| 1935 | 4.46 | -4.7% |
| 1936 | 4.72 | +5.8% |
| 1937 | 5.14 | +9.0% |
| 1938 | 5 | -2.7% |
| 1939 | 4.65 | -7.1% |
| 1940 | 3.77 | -18.9% |
| 1941 | 4.13 | +9.6% |
| 1942 | 3.8 | -8.0% |
| 1943 | 3.79 | -0.3% |
| 1944 | 2.5 | -34.1% |
| 1945 | 1.55 | -38.0% |
| 1946 | 3.25 | +109.5% |
| 1947 | 4.59 | +41.6% |
| 1948 | 4.81 | +4.6% |
| 1949 | 5.07 | +5.5% |
| 1950 | 5.07 | +0.1% |
| 1951 | 5.36 | +5.6% |
| 1952 | 5.27 | -1.6% |
| 1953 | 5.27 | -0.1% |
| 1954 | 5.5 | +4.5% |
| 1955 | 5.67 | +3.1% |
| 1956 | 5.98 | +5.4% |
| 1957 | 5.84 | -2.3% |
| 1958 | 5.96 | +2.1% |
| 1959 | 5.92 | -0.8% |
| 1960 | 6.39 | +8.1% |
| 1961 | 6.52 | +1.9% |
| 1962 | 7.05 | +8.3% |
| 1963 | 7.62 | +8.0% |
| 1964 | 7.98 | +4.7% |
| 1965 | 8.16 | +2.3% |
| 1966 | 8.31 | +1.8% |
| 1967 | 8.46 | +1.8% |
| 1968 | 8.9 | +5.2% |
| 1969 | 8.98 | +0.9% |
| 1970 | 10.87 | +20.9% |
| 1971 | 10.65 | -2.0% |
| 1972 | 11.8 | +10.8% |
| 1973 | 12.28 | +4.1% |
| 1974 | 11.8 | -3.9% |
| 1975 | 11.15 | -5.5% |
| 1976 | 12.27 | +10.0% |
| 1977 | 11.8 | -3.8% |
| 1978 | 12.17 | +3.1% |
| 1979 | 13.31 | +9.4% |
| 1980 | 12.47 | -6.3% |
| 1981 | 11.51 | -7.7% |
| 1982 | 9.31 | -19.1% |
| 1983 | 9.54 | +2.4% |
| 1984 | 9.96 | +4.4% |
| 1985 | 10.11 | +1.5% |
| 1986 | 9.85 | -2.6% |
| 1987 | 10.29 | +4.5% |
| 1988 | 9.82 | -4.5% |
| 1989 | 10.83 | +10.3% |
| 1990 | 10.85 | +0.1% |
| 1991 | 11.31 | +4.3% |
| 1992 | 11.21 | -0.9% |
| 1993 | 11.12 | -0.8% |
| 1994 | 11.1 | -0.2% |
| 1995 | 11.15 | +0.4% |
| 1996 | 11.67 | +4.7% |
| 1997 | 11.16 | -4.4% |
| 1998 | 11.15 | -0.1% |
| 1999 | 10.73 | -3.7% |
| 2000 | 10.72 | -0.1% |
| 2001 | 10.97 | +2.3% |
| 2002 | 10.85 | -1.1% |
| 2003 | 11.01 | +1.4% |
| 2004 | 11.09 | +0.7% |
| 2005 | 10.82 | -2.4% |
| 2006 | 10.51 | -2.9% |
| 2007 | 10.47 | -0.4% |
| 2008 | 10.6 | +1.3% |
| 2009 | 10.22 | -3.6% |
| 2010 | 10.88 | +6.5% |
| 2011 | 10.05 | -7.6% |
| 2012 | 9.8 | -2.5% |
| 2013 | 9.72 | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 9.25 | -4.9% |
| 2015 | 9.58 | +3.6% |
| 2016 | 9.58 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | 9.37 | -2.2% |
| 2018 | 9.08 | -3.1% |
| 2019 | 8.71 | -4.1% |
| 2020 | 7.77 | -10.8% |
| 2021 | 7.89 | +1.6% |
| 2022 | 7.12 | -9.7% |
| 2023 | 6.47 | -9.2% |
| 2024 | 6.3 | -2.6% |
Netherlands compared with similar countries
- Netherlands's 6.3 is above the median for high income countries, which is 6.14, 1.0× the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Netherlands's 6.3 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 5.13, 1.2× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity in Netherlands changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1946 | +109.5% | 1.55 | 3.25 |
| 1918 | +65.4% | 1.32 | 2.19 |
| 1917 | -61.9% | 3.47 | 1.32 |
| 1919 | +49.1% | 2.19 | 3.26 |
| 1854 | +41.6% | 1.32 | 1.87 |
| 1947 | +41.6% | 3.25 | 4.59 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 1.13 | 0.9526 | 1.28 | 4 |
| 1850s | 1.28 | 0.9996 | 1.87 | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.25 | 0.9922 | 1.68 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.49 | 1.26 | 1.81 | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.17 | 1.96 | 2.45 | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.5 | 2.27 | 2.65 | 10 |
| 1900s | 3.04 | 2.71 | 3.42 | 10 |
| 1910s | 3.4 | 1.32 | 4.46 | 10 |
| 1920s | 4.3 | 3.24 | 5.32 | 10 |
| 1930s | 4.94 | 4.46 | 5.65 | 10 |
| 1940s | 3.73 | 1.55 | 5.07 | 10 |
| 1950s | 5.58 | 5.07 | 5.98 | 10 |
| 1960s | 7.84 | 6.39 | 8.98 | 10 |
| 1970s | 11.81 | 10.65 | 13.31 | 10 |
| 1980s | 10.37 | 9.31 | 12.47 | 10 |
| 1990s | 11.15 | 10.73 | 11.67 | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.72 | 10.22 | 11.09 | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.6 | 8.71 | 10.88 | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.11 | 6.3 | 7.89 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Netherlands
More climate change data for Netherlands
- Share co2 vs population 0.172 (2100)
- Co2 gdp growth, annual growth rate 66.19 % change on previous year (2025)
- Co2 gdp pop growth, annual growth rate -19.57 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, annual growth rate 0.523 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, annual growth rate 0.8374 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, per capita 0.9594 units per person (2025)
- Precipitation anomalies, annual growth rate -175.91 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population 95.9% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 per capita vs renewable electricity in Netherlands?
- Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity in Netherlands was 6.3 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 per capita vs renewable electricity recorded in Netherlands?
- The highest recorded value was 13.31 in 1979.
- What is the lowest co2 per capita vs renewable electricity recorded in Netherlands?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9526 in 1846.
- How does Netherlands rank for co2 per capita vs renewable electricity?
- Netherlands ranks 46th out of 213 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 per capita vs renewable electricity rising or falling in Netherlands?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Netherlands data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 179 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).