Cumulative co2 cement in Bolivia
Bolivia: Cumulative co2 cement was 34.38 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 cement in Bolivia, 1750–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 cement in Bolivia is 34.38 million, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 275 years on record.
That represents a change of up 4.9% on the previous year and up 75.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 cement in Bolivia peaked at 34.38 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1750.
That places Bolivia 89th out of 211 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 cement in Bolivia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1750 | 0 | — |
| 1751 | 0 | — |
| 1752 | 0 | — |
| 1753 | 0 | — |
| 1754 | 0 | — |
| 1755 | 0 | — |
| 1756 | 0 | — |
| 1757 | 0 | — |
| 1758 | 0 | — |
| 1759 | 0 | — |
| 1760 | 0 | — |
| 1761 | 0 | — |
| 1762 | 0 | — |
| 1763 | 0 | — |
| 1764 | 0 | — |
| 1765 | 0 | — |
| 1766 | 0 | — |
| 1767 | 0 | — |
| 1768 | 0 | — |
| 1769 | 0 | — |
| 1770 | 0 | — |
| 1771 | 0 | — |
| 1772 | 0 | — |
| 1773 | 0 | — |
| 1774 | 0 | — |
| 1775 | 0 | — |
| 1776 | 0 | — |
| 1777 | 0 | — |
| 1778 | 0 | — |
| 1779 | 0 | — |
| 1780 | 0 | — |
| 1781 | 0 | — |
| 1782 | 0 | — |
| 1783 | 0 | — |
| 1784 | 0 | — |
| 1785 | 0 | — |
| 1786 | 0 | — |
| 1787 | 0 | — |
| 1788 | 0 | — |
| 1789 | 0 | — |
| 1790 | 0 | — |
| 1791 | 0 | — |
| 1792 | 0 | — |
| 1793 | 0 | — |
| 1794 | 0 | — |
| 1795 | 0 | — |
| 1796 | 0 | — |
| 1797 | 0 | — |
| 1798 | 0 | — |
| 1799 | 0 | — |
| 1800 | 0 | — |
| 1801 | 0 | — |
| 1802 | 0 | — |
| 1803 | 0 | — |
| 1804 | 0 | — |
| 1805 | 0 | — |
| 1806 | 0 | — |
| 1807 | 0 | — |
| 1808 | 0 | — |
| 1809 | 0 | — |
| 1810 | 0 | — |
| 1811 | 0 | — |
| 1812 | 0 | — |
| 1813 | 0 | — |
| 1814 | 0 | — |
| 1815 | 0 | — |
| 1816 | 0 | — |
| 1817 | 0 | — |
| 1818 | 0 | — |
| 1819 | 0 | — |
| 1820 | 0 | — |
| 1821 | 0 | — |
| 1822 | 0 | — |
| 1823 | 0 | — |
| 1824 | 0 | — |
| 1825 | 0 | — |
| 1826 | 0 | — |
| 1827 | 0 | — |
| 1828 | 0 | — |
| 1829 | 0 | — |
| 1830 | 0 | — |
| 1831 | 0 | — |
| 1832 | 0 | — |
| 1833 | 0 | — |
| 1834 | 0 | — |
| 1835 | 0 | — |
| 1836 | 0 | — |
| 1837 | 0 | — |
| 1838 | 0 | — |
| 1839 | 0 | — |
| 1840 | 0 | — |
| 1841 | 0 | — |
| 1842 | 0 | — |
| 1843 | 0 | — |
| 1844 | 0 | — |
| 1845 | 0 | — |
| 1846 | 0 | — |
| 1847 | 0 | — |
| 1848 | 0 | — |
| 1849 | 0 | — |
| 1850 | 0 | — |
| 1851 | 0 | — |
| 1852 | 0 | — |
| 1853 | 0 | — |
| 1854 | 0 | — |
| 1855 | 0 | — |
| 1856 | 0 | — |
| 1857 | 0 | — |
| 1858 | 0 | — |
| 1859 | 0 | — |
| 1860 | 0 | — |
| 1861 | 0 | — |
| 1862 | 0 | — |
| 1863 | 0 | — |
| 1864 | 0 | — |
| 1865 | 0 | — |
| 1866 | 0 | — |
| 1867 | 0 | — |
| 1868 | 0 | — |
| 1869 | 0 | — |
| 1870 | 0 | — |
| 1871 | 0 | — |
| 1872 | 0 | — |
| 1873 | 0 | — |
| 1874 | 0 | — |
| 1875 | 0 | — |
| 1876 | 0 | — |
| 1877 | 0 | — |
| 1878 | 0 | — |
| 1879 | 0 | — |
| 1880 | 0 | — |
| 1881 | 0 | — |
| 1882 | 0 | — |
| 1883 | 0 | — |
| 1884 | 0 | — |
| 1885 | 0 | — |
| 1886 | 0 | — |
| 1887 | 0 | — |
| 1888 | 0 | — |
| 1889 | 0 | — |
| 1890 | 0 | — |
| 1891 | 0 | — |
| 1892 | 0 | — |
| 1893 | 0 | — |
| 1894 | 0 | — |
| 1895 | 0 | — |
| 1896 | 0 | — |
| 1897 | 0 | — |
| 1898 | 0 | — |
| 1899 | 0 | — |
| 1900 | 0 | — |
| 1901 | 0 | — |
| 1902 | 0 | — |
| 1903 | 0 | — |
| 1904 | 0 | — |
| 1905 | 0 | — |
| 1906 | 0 | — |
| 1907 | 0 | — |
| 1908 | 0 | — |
| 1909 | 0 | — |
| 1910 | 0 | — |
| 1911 | 0 | — |
| 1912 | 0 | — |
| 1913 | 0 | — |
| 1914 | 0 | — |
| 1915 | 0 | — |
| 1916 | 0 | — |
| 1917 | 0 | — |
| 1918 | 0 | — |
| 1919 | 0 | — |
| 1920 | 0 | — |
| 1921 | 0 | — |
| 1922 | 0 | — |
| 1923 | 0 | — |
| 1924 | 0 | — |
| 1925 | 0 | — |
| 1926 | 0 | — |
| 1927 | 0 | — |
| 1928 | 0 | — |
| 1929 | 0 | — |
| 1930 | 0 | — |
| 1931 | 0 | — |
| 1932 | 0 | — |
| 1933 | 0 | — |
| 1934 | 13,845 | — |
| 1935 | 17,479 | +26.2% |
| 1936 | 21,113 | +20.8% |
| 1937 | 25,007 | +18.4% |
| 1938 | 35,910 | +43.6% |
| 1939 | 35,910 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 46,813 | +30.4% |
| 1941 | 57,716 | +23.3% |
| 1942 | 68,922 | +19.4% |
| 1943 | 79,825 | +15.8% |
| 1944 | 94,362 | +18.2% |
| 1945 | 108,899 | +15.4% |
| 1946 | 123,774 | +13.7% |
| 1947 | 141,945 | +14.7% |
| 1948 | 160,447 | +13.0% |
| 1949 | 181,980 | +13.4% |
| 1950 | 200,018 | +9.9% |
| 1951 | 218,189 | +9.1% |
| 1952 | 236,360 | +8.3% |
| 1953 | 254,531 | +7.7% |
| 1954 | 269,068 | +5.7% |
| 1955 | 287,239 | +6.8% |
| 1956 | 301,824 | +5.1% |
| 1957 | 312,687 | +3.6% |
| 1958 | 327,166 | +4.6% |
| 1959 | 341,703 | +4.4% |
| 1960 | 359,874 | +5.3% |
| 1961 | 381,680 | +6.1% |
| 1962 | 407,120 | +6.7% |
| 1963 | 436,107 | +7.1% |
| 1964 | 468,735 | +7.5% |
| 1965 | 497,809 | +6.2% |
| 1966 | 530,518 | +6.6% |
| 1967 | 559,592 | +5.5% |
| 1968 | 595,996 | +6.5% |
| 1969 | 635,916 | +6.7% |
| 1970 | 694,065 | +9.1% |
| 1971 | 755,774 | +8.9% |
| 1972 | 828,460 | +9.6% |
| 1973 | 912,049 | +10.1% |
| 1974 | 1.01 million | +11.2% |
| 1975 | 1.14 million | +12.9% |
| 1976 | 1.25 million | +9.5% |
| 1977 | 1.38 million | +10.4% |
| 1978 | 1.51 million | +9.1% |
| 1979 | 1.63 million | +8.1% |
| 1980 | 1.77 million | +8.8% |
| 1981 | 1.96 million | +10.3% |
| 1982 | 2.11 million | +8.0% |
| 1983 | 2.27 million | +7.6% |
| 1984 | 2.41 million | +6.1% |
| 1985 | 2.59 million | +7.6% |
| 1986 | 2.73 million | +5.4% |
| 1987 | 2.92 million | +6.9% |
| 1988 | 3.14 million | +7.4% |
| 1989 | 3.38 million | +7.6% |
| 1990 | 3.64 million | +7.8% |
| 1991 | 3.92 million | +7.6% |
| 1992 | 4.22 million | +7.8% |
| 1993 | 4.56 million | +7.9% |
| 1994 | 4.92 million | +7.9% |
| 1995 | 5.33 million | +8.4% |
| 1996 | 5.75 million | +7.8% |
| 1997 | 6.23 million | +8.4% |
| 1998 | 6.77 million | +8.6% |
| 1999 | 7.32 million | +8.1% |
| 2000 | 7.81 million | +6.7% |
| 2001 | 8.25 million | +5.7% |
| 2002 | 8.71 million | +5.5% |
| 2003 | 9.22 million | +5.9% |
| 2004 | 9.79 million | +6.2% |
| 2005 | 10.43 million | +6.5% |
| 2006 | 11.15 million | +7.0% |
| 2007 | 11.92 million | +6.9% |
| 2008 | 12.78 million | +7.3% |
| 2009 | 13.79 million | +7.9% |
| 2010 | 14.83 million | +7.6% |
| 2011 | 15.98 million | +7.7% |
| 2012 | 17.08 million | +6.9% |
| 2013 | 18.29 million | +7.1% |
| 2014 | 19.61 million | +7.3% |
| 2015 | 21.00 million | +7.0% |
| 2016 | 22.43 million | +6.8% |
| 2017 | 23.87 million | +6.4% |
| 2018 | 25.36 million | +6.3% |
| 2019 | 26.92 million | +6.1% |
| 2020 | 28.19 million | +4.7% |
| 2021 | 29.63 million | +5.1% |
| 2022 | 31.18 million | +5.2% |
| 2023 | 32.76 million | +5.1% |
| 2024 | 34.38 million | +4.9% |
Bolivia compared with similar countries
- Bolivia's 34.38 million is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 23.13 million, 1.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Bolivia's 34.38 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 11.90 million, 2.9× the median. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 cement in Bolivia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1938 | +43.6% | 25,007 | 35,910 |
| 1940 | +30.4% | 35,910 | 46,813 |
| 1935 | +26.2% | 13,845 | 17,479 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1750s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1760s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1770s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1930s | 14,926 | 0 | 35,910 | 10 |
| 1940s | 106,468 | 46,813 | 181,980 | 10 |
| 1950s | 274,878 | 200,018 | 341,703 | 10 |
| 1960s | 487,335 | 359,874 | 635,916 | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.11 million | 694,065 | 1.63 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.53 million | 1.77 million | 3.38 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.27 million | 3.64 million | 7.32 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.39 million | 7.81 million | 13.79 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 20.54 million | 14.83 million | 26.92 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 31.23 million | 28.19 million | 34.38 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia
More climate change data for Bolivia
- Share co2 vs population 0.1745 (2100)
- Co2 gdp growth, annual growth rate -40.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Co2 gdp pop growth, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, annual growth rate 1.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, annual growth rate 1.82 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, per capita 0.7156 units per person (2025)
- Precipitation anomalies, annual growth rate 97.47 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population 71.6% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 cement in Bolivia?
- Cumulative co2 cement in Bolivia was 34.38 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 cement recorded in Bolivia?
- The highest recorded value was 34.38 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 cement recorded in Bolivia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1750.
- How does Bolivia rank for cumulative co2 cement?
- Bolivia ranks 89th out of 211 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 cement rising or falling in Bolivia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 75.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bolivia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 cement. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 275 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).