Cumulative co2 cement in Tunisia
Tunisia: Cumulative co2 cement was 155.30 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
155.30 million
Change on year
up 2.8%
World rank
44th
of 211 countries
All-time high
155.30 million
in 2024
All-time low
0
in 1750
Years of data
274
1750–2024
Cumulative co2 cement in Tunisia, 1750–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded 155.30 million for cumulative co2 cement in 2024. That is the highest value across all 274 years on record.
The figure is up 2.8% on the previous year and up 39.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 cement in Tunisia peaked at 155.30 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1750.
Tunisia ranks 44th of 211 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 cement in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1750 | 0 | — |
| 1751 | 0 | — |
| 1752 | 0 | — |
| 1753 | 0 | — |
| 1754 | 0 | — |
| 1755 | 0 | — |
| 1756 | 0 | — |
| 1757 | 0 | — |
| 1758 | 0 | — |
| 1759 | 0 | — |
| 1760 | 0 | — |
| 1761 | 0 | — |
| 1762 | 0 | — |
| 1763 | 0 | — |
| 1764 | 0 | — |
| 1765 | 0 | — |
| 1766 | 0 | — |
| 1767 | 0 | — |
| 1768 | 0 | — |
| 1769 | 0 | — |
| 1770 | 0 | — |
| 1771 | 0 | — |
| 1772 | 0 | — |
| 1773 | 0 | — |
| 1774 | 0 | — |
| 1775 | 0 | — |
| 1776 | 0 | — |
| 1777 | 0 | — |
| 1778 | 0 | — |
| 1779 | 0 | — |
| 1780 | 0 | — |
| 1781 | 0 | — |
| 1782 | 0 | — |
| 1783 | 0 | — |
| 1784 | 0 | — |
| 1785 | 0 | — |
| 1786 | 0 | — |
| 1787 | 0 | — |
| 1788 | 0 | — |
| 1789 | 0 | — |
| 1790 | 0 | — |
| 1791 | 0 | — |
| 1792 | 0 | — |
| 1793 | 0 | — |
| 1794 | 0 | — |
| 1795 | 0 | — |
| 1796 | 0 | — |
| 1797 | 0 | — |
| 1798 | 0 | — |
| 1799 | 0 | — |
| 1800 | 0 | — |
| 1801 | 0 | — |
| 1802 | 0 | — |
| 1803 | 0 | — |
| 1804 | 0 | — |
| 1805 | 0 | — |
| 1806 | 0 | — |
| 1807 | 0 | — |
| 1808 | 0 | — |
| 1809 | 0 | — |
| 1810 | 0 | — |
| 1811 | 0 | — |
| 1812 | 0 | — |
| 1813 | 0 | — |
| 1814 | 0 | — |
| 1815 | 0 | — |
| 1816 | 0 | — |
| 1817 | 0 | — |
| 1818 | 0 | — |
| 1819 | 0 | — |
| 1820 | 0 | — |
| 1821 | 0 | — |
| 1822 | 0 | — |
| 1823 | 0 | — |
| 1824 | 0 | — |
| 1825 | 0 | — |
| 1826 | 0 | — |
| 1827 | 0 | — |
| 1828 | 0 | — |
| 1829 | 0 | — |
| 1830 | 0 | — |
| 1831 | 0 | — |
| 1832 | 0 | — |
| 1833 | 0 | — |
| 1834 | 0 | — |
| 1835 | 0 | — |
| 1836 | 0 | — |
| 1837 | 0 | — |
| 1838 | 0 | — |
| 1839 | 0 | — |
| 1840 | 0 | — |
| 1841 | 0 | — |
| 1842 | 0 | — |
| 1843 | 0 | — |
| 1844 | 0 | — |
| 1845 | 0 | — |
| 1846 | 0 | — |
| 1847 | 0 | — |
| 1848 | 0 | — |
| 1849 | 0 | — |
| 1850 | 0 | — |
| 1851 | 0 | — |
| 1852 | 0 | — |
| 1853 | 0 | — |
| 1854 | 0 | — |
| 1855 | 0 | — |
| 1856 | 0 | — |
| 1857 | 0 | — |
| 1858 | 0 | — |
| 1859 | 0 | — |
| 1860 | 0 | — |
| 1861 | 0 | — |
| 1862 | 0 | — |
| 1863 | 0 | — |
| 1864 | 0 | — |
| 1865 | 0 | — |
| 1866 | 0 | — |
| 1867 | 0 | — |
| 1868 | 0 | — |
| 1869 | 0 | — |
| 1870 | 0 | — |
| 1871 | 0 | — |
| 1872 | 0 | — |
| 1873 | 0 | — |
| 1874 | 0 | — |
| 1875 | 0 | — |
| 1876 | 0 | — |
| 1877 | 0 | — |
| 1878 | 0 | — |
| 1879 | 0 | — |
| 1880 | 0 | — |
| 1881 | 0 | — |
| 1882 | 0 | — |
| 1883 | 0 | — |
| 1884 | 0 | — |
| 1885 | 0 | — |
| 1886 | 0 | — |
| 1887 | 0 | — |
| 1888 | 0 | — |
| 1889 | 0 | — |
| 1890 | 0 | — |
| 1891 | 0 | — |
| 1892 | 0 | — |
| 1893 | 0 | — |
| 1894 | 0 | — |
| 1895 | 0 | — |
| 1896 | 0 | — |
| 1897 | 0 | — |
| 1898 | 0 | — |
| 1899 | 0 | — |
| 1900 | 0 | — |
| 1901 | 0 | — |
| 1902 | 0 | — |
| 1903 | 0 | — |
| 1904 | 0 | — |
| 1905 | 0 | — |
| 1906 | 0 | — |
| 1907 | 0 | — |
| 1908 | 0 | — |
| 1909 | 0 | — |
| 1910 | 0 | — |
| 1911 | 0 | — |
| 1912 | 0 | — |
| 1913 | 0 | — |
| 1914 | 0 | — |
| 1915 | 0 | — |
| 1916 | 0 | — |
| 1917 | 0 | — |
| 1918 | 0 | — |
| 1919 | 0 | — |
| 1920 | 0 | — |
| 1921 | 0 | — |
| 1922 | 0 | — |
| 1923 | 0 | — |
| 1924 | 0 | — |
| 1925 | 0 | — |
| 1926 | 0 | — |
| 1927 | 0 | — |
| 1928 | 0 | — |
| 1929 | 0 | — |
| 1930 | 0 | — |
| 1931 | 0 | — |
| 1933 | 18,171 | — |
| 1934 | 36,342 | +100.0% |
| 1935 | 54,513 | +50.0% |
| 1936 | 79,953 | +46.7% |
| 1937 | 109,027 | +36.4% |
| 1938 | 141,736 | +30.0% |
| 1939 | 171,174 | +20.8% |
| 1940 | 202,187 | +18.1% |
| 1941 | 231,261 | +14.4% |
| 1942 | 260,335 | +12.6% |
| 1943 | 272,077 | +4.5% |
| 1944 | 301,151 | +10.7% |
| 1945 | 330,225 | +9.7% |
| 1946 | 371,344 | +12.5% |
| 1947 | 429,493 | +15.7% |
| 1948 | 509,447 | +18.6% |
| 1949 | 593,036 | +16.4% |
| 1950 | 676,625 | +14.1% |
| 1951 | 767,482 | +13.4% |
| 1952 | 869,242 | +13.3% |
| 1953 | 981,905 | +13.0% |
| 1954 | 1.12 million | +14.5% |
| 1955 | 1.31 million | +16.8% |
| 1956 | 1.49 million | +13.6% |
| 1957 | 1.69 million | +13.4% |
| 1958 | 1.86 million | +10.1% |
| 1959 | 2.08 million | +11.7% |
| 1960 | 2.28 million | +9.6% |
| 1961 | 2.44 million | +7.2% |
| 1962 | 2.62 million | +7.3% |
| 1963 | 2.80 million | +6.8% |
| 1964 | 3.02 million | +8.0% |
| 1965 | 3.25 million | +7.5% |
| 1966 | 3.49 million | +7.3% |
| 1967 | 3.72 million | +6.7% |
| 1968 | 3.97 million | +6.7% |
| 1969 | 4.27 million | +7.5% |
| 1970 | 4.54 million | +6.3% |
| 1971 | 4.83 million | +6.5% |
| 1972 | 5.16 million | +6.8% |
| 1973 | 5.45 million | +5.5% |
| 1974 | 5.75 million | +5.5% |
| 1975 | 6.11 million | +6.2% |
| 1976 | 6.39 million | +4.7% |
| 1977 | 6.75 million | +5.5% |
| 1978 | 7.30 million | +8.3% |
| 1979 | 8.20 million | +12.3% |
| 1980 | 9.38 million | +14.4% |
| 1981 | 10.77 million | +14.7% |
| 1982 | 12.01 million | +11.6% |
| 1983 | 14.06 million | +17.0% |
| 1984 | 16.10 million | +14.5% |
| 1985 | 18.40 million | +14.3% |
| 1986 | 20.69 million | +12.5% |
| 1987 | 23.36 million | +12.9% |
| 1988 | 25.96 million | +11.1% |
| 1989 | 28.63 million | +10.3% |
| 1990 | 31.39 million | +9.6% |
| 1991 | 34.20 million | +9.0% |
| 1992 | 36.95 million | +8.0% |
| 1993 | 39.91 million | +8.0% |
| 1994 | 42.92 million | +7.5% |
| 1995 | 45.82 million | +6.8% |
| 1996 | 48.78 million | +6.5% |
| 1997 | 51.67 million | +5.9% |
| 1998 | 54.56 million | +5.6% |
| 1999 | 57.17 million | +4.8% |
| 2000 | 60.00 million | +5.0% |
| 2001 | 62.83 million | +4.7% |
| 2002 | 65.68 million | +4.5% |
| 2003 | 68.75 million | +4.7% |
| 2004 | 72.31 million | +5.2% |
| 2005 | 75.80 million | +4.8% |
| 2006 | 79.41 million | +4.8% |
| 2007 | 83.28 million | +4.9% |
| 2008 | 87.20 million | +4.7% |
| 2009 | 91.11 million | +4.5% |
| 2010 | 95.17 million | +4.4% |
| 2011 | 98.58 million | +3.6% |
| 2012 | 102.57 million | +4.0% |
| 2013 | 106.73 million | +4.1% |
| 2014 | 111.57 million | +4.5% |
| 2015 | 116.46 million | +4.4% |
| 2016 | 121.15 million | +4.0% |
| 2017 | 125.54 million | +3.6% |
| 2018 | 129.79 million | +3.4% |
| 2019 | 134.20 million | +3.4% |
| 2020 | 138.08 million | +2.9% |
| 2021 | 142.67 million | +3.3% |
| 2022 | 146.88 million | +3.0% |
| 2023 | 151.09 million | +2.9% |
| 2024 | 155.30 million | +2.8% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 155.30 million is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 23.13 million, 6.7× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 155.30 million is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 73.55 million, 2.1× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 cement in Tunisia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1934 | +100.0% | 18,171 | 36,342 |
| 1935 | +50.0% | 36,342 | 54,513 |
| 1936 | +46.7% | 54,513 | 79,953 |
| 1937 | +36.4% | 79,953 | 109,027 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1750s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1760s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1770s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1930s | 67,880 | 0 | 171,174 | 9 |
| 1940s | 350,056 | 202,187 | 593,036 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.29 million | 676,625 | 2.08 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 3.19 million | 2.28 million | 4.27 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 6.05 million | 4.54 million | 8.20 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 17.94 million | 9.38 million | 28.63 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 44.34 million | 31.39 million | 57.17 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 74.64 million | 60.00 million | 91.11 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 114.18 million | 95.17 million | 134.20 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 146.80 million | 138.08 million | 155.30 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More climate change data for Tunisia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 241.72 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,824 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,319 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,505 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 8.75 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 125.16 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,551 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,529 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 21.55 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.77 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 cement in Tunisia?
- Cumulative co2 cement in Tunisia was 155.30 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 cement recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 155.30 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 cement recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1750.
- How does Tunisia rank for cumulative co2 cement?
- Tunisia ranks 44th out of 211 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 cement rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 cement. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 274 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).