Cumulative co2 coal in Poland
Poland: Cumulative co2 coal was 23.64 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
23.64 billion
Change on year
up 0.5%
World rank
8th
of 179 countries
All-time high
23.64 billion
in 2024
All-time low
406,704
in 1800
Years of data
225
1800–2024
Cumulative co2 coal in Poland, 1800–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Poland recorded 23.64 billion for cumulative co2 coal in 2024. That is the highest value across all 225 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 8.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 coal in Poland peaked at 23.64 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 406,704, in 1800.
Poland ranks 8th of 179 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 coal in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1800 | 406,704 | — |
| 1801 | 850,048 | +109.0% |
| 1802 | 1.30 million | +53.0% |
| 1803 | 1.76 million | +35.5% |
| 1804 | 2.22 million | +26.0% |
| 1805 | 2.79 million | +25.7% |
| 1806 | 3.31 million | +18.6% |
| 1807 | 3.69 million | +11.4% |
| 1808 | 4.19 million | +13.6% |
| 1809 | 4.66 million | +11.3% |
| 1810 | 5.23 million | +12.2% |
| 1811 | 5.82 million | +11.3% |
| 1812 | 6.28 million | +7.8% |
| 1813 | 6.66 million | +6.1% |
| 1814 | 7.16 million | +7.5% |
| 1815 | 7.75 million | +8.2% |
| 1816 | 8.43 million | +8.7% |
| 1817 | 9.17 million | +8.8% |
| 1818 | 10.09 million | +10.1% |
| 1819 | 10.85 million | +7.5% |
| 1820 | 11.60 million | +6.9% |
| 1821 | 12.43 million | +7.1% |
| 1822 | 13.34 million | +7.3% |
| 1823 | 14.56 million | +9.1% |
| 1824 | 15.83 million | +8.8% |
| 1825 | 17.16 million | +8.4% |
| 1826 | 18.38 million | +7.1% |
| 1827 | 19.69 million | +7.1% |
| 1828 | 20.90 million | +6.1% |
| 1829 | 21.96 million | +5.1% |
| 1830 | 22.95 million | +4.5% |
| 1831 | 23.76 million | +3.5% |
| 1832 | 24.79 million | +4.3% |
| 1833 | 25.87 million | +4.3% |
| 1834 | 27.00 million | +4.4% |
| 1835 | 28.21 million | +4.5% |
| 1836 | 29.58 million | +4.9% |
| 1837 | 31.05 million | +5.0% |
| 1838 | 32.64 million | +5.1% |
| 1839 | 34.32 million | +5.2% |
| 1840 | 36.28 million | +5.7% |
| 1841 | 38.42 million | +5.9% |
| 1842 | 40.71 million | +5.9% |
| 1843 | 42.95 million | +5.5% |
| 1844 | 45.35 million | +5.6% |
| 1845 | 48.14 million | +6.2% |
| 1846 | 51.09 million | +6.1% |
| 1847 | 54.11 million | +5.9% |
| 1848 | 57.15 million | +5.6% |
| 1849 | 60.16 million | +5.3% |
| 1850 | 63.36 million | +5.3% |
| 1851 | 66.82 million | +5.5% |
| 1852 | 70.95 million | +6.2% |
| 1853 | 75.27 million | +6.1% |
| 1854 | 80.04 million | +6.3% |
| 1855 | 85.66 million | +7.0% |
| 1856 | 91.98 million | +7.4% |
| 1857 | 98.70 million | +7.3% |
| 1858 | 106.40 million | +7.8% |
| 1859 | 113.51 million | +6.7% |
| 1860 | 121.00 million | +6.6% |
| 1861 | 128.67 million | +6.3% |
| 1862 | 137.47 million | +6.8% |
| 1863 | 147.53 million | +7.3% |
| 1864 | 158.75 million | +7.6% |
| 1865 | 171.17 million | +7.8% |
| 1866 | 183.32 million | +7.1% |
| 1867 | 196.61 million | +7.3% |
| 1868 | 211.73 million | +7.7% |
| 1869 | 227.34 million | +7.4% |
| 1870 | 244.01 million | +7.3% |
| 1871 | 262.98 million | +7.8% |
| 1872 | 283.61 million | +7.8% |
| 1873 | 305.96 million | +7.9% |
| 1874 | 330.39 million | +8.0% |
| 1875 | 354.39 million | +7.3% |
| 1876 | 378.90 million | +6.9% |
| 1877 | 401.97 million | +6.1% |
| 1878 | 426.23 million | +6.0% |
| 1879 | 452.62 million | +6.2% |
| 1880 | 478.87 million | +5.8% |
| 1881 | 504.98 million | +5.5% |
| 1882 | 532.08 million | +5.4% |
| 1883 | 561.86 million | +5.6% |
| 1884 | 592.89 million | +5.5% |
| 1885 | 625.29 million | +5.5% |
| 1886 | 658.59 million | +5.3% |
| 1887 | 692.12 million | +5.1% |
| 1888 | 729.42 million | +5.4% |
| 1889 | 769.72 million | +5.5% |
| 1890 | 811.31 million | +5.4% |
| 1891 | 856.38 million | +5.6% |
| 1892 | 899.20 million | +5.0% |
| 1893 | 944.25 million | +5.0% |
| 1894 | 989.94 million | +4.8% |
| 1895 | 1.04 billion | +4.9% |
| 1896 | 1.09 billion | +5.0% |
| 1897 | 1.14 billion | +5.0% |
| 1898 | 1.20 billion | +5.1% |
| 1899 | 1.26 billion | +5.1% |
| 1900 | 1.33 billion | +4.9% |
| 1901 | 1.39 billion | +5.0% |
| 1902 | 1.46 billion | +4.6% |
| 1903 | 1.52 billion | +4.6% |
| 1904 | 1.59 billion | +4.4% |
| 1905 | 1.66 billion | +4.6% |
| 1906 | 1.74 billion | +4.6% |
| 1907 | 1.82 billion | +4.8% |
| 1908 | 1.91 billion | +4.8% |
| 1909 | 2.00 billion | +4.7% |
| 1910 | 2.09 billion | +4.5% |
| 1911 | 2.18 billion | +4.6% |
| 1912 | 2.29 billion | +4.9% |
| 1913 | 2.40 billion | +4.9% |
| 1914 | 2.50 billion | +3.9% |
| 1915 | 2.59 billion | +3.7% |
| 1916 | 2.70 billion | +4.1% |
| 1917 | 2.81 billion | +4.4% |
| 1918 | 2.91 billion | +3.5% |
| 1919 | 2.91 billion | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 2.99 billion | +2.5% |
| 1921 | 3.06 billion | +2.4% |
| 1922 | 3.13 billion | +2.3% |
| 1923 | 3.18 billion | +1.6% |
| 1924 | 3.23 billion | +1.4% |
| 1925 | 3.27 billion | +1.4% |
| 1926 | 3.32 billion | +1.4% |
| 1927 | 3.38 billion | +1.8% |
| 1928 | 3.44 billion | +1.8% |
| 1929 | 3.51 billion | +2.0% |
| 1930 | 3.56 billion | +1.5% |
| 1931 | 3.61 billion | +1.5% |
| 1932 | 3.65 billion | +1.1% |
| 1933 | 3.69 billion | +1.1% |
| 1934 | 3.74 billion | +1.2% |
| 1935 | 3.78 billion | +1.2% |
| 1936 | 3.83 billion | +1.3% |
| 1937 | 3.88 billion | +1.4% |
| 1938 | 3.94 billion | +1.5% |
| 1939 | 3.99 billion | +1.3% |
| 1940 | 4.15 billion | +4.2% |
| 1941 | 4.32 billion | +3.9% |
| 1942 | 4.50 billion | +4.2% |
| 1943 | 4.70 billion | +4.4% |
| 1944 | 4.88 billion | +4.0% |
| 1945 | 4.94 billion | +1.2% |
| 1946 | 5.04 billion | +2.1% |
| 1947 | 5.13 billion | +1.8% |
| 1948 | 5.22 billion | +1.7% |
| 1949 | 5.32 billion | +2.0% |
| 1950 | 5.43 billion | +2.0% |
| 1951 | 5.55 billion | +2.2% |
| 1952 | 5.67 billion | +2.2% |
| 1953 | 5.81 billion | +2.4% |
| 1954 | 5.95 billion | +2.4% |
| 1955 | 6.10 billion | +2.5% |
| 1956 | 6.26 billion | +2.6% |
| 1957 | 6.43 billion | +2.7% |
| 1958 | 6.60 billion | +2.6% |
| 1959 | 6.78 billion | +2.7% |
| 1960 | 6.97 billion | +2.8% |
| 1961 | 7.16 billion | +2.8% |
| 1962 | 7.36 billion | +2.8% |
| 1963 | 7.58 billion | +2.9% |
| 1964 | 7.80 billion | +3.0% |
| 1965 | 8.03 billion | +2.9% |
| 1966 | 8.26 billion | +2.9% |
| 1967 | 8.49 billion | +2.8% |
| 1968 | 8.74 billion | +2.9% |
| 1969 | 8.99 billion | +3.0% |
| 1970 | 9.26 billion | +2.9% |
| 1971 | 9.52 billion | +2.9% |
| 1972 | 9.80 billion | +3.0% |
| 1973 | 10.09 billion | +2.9% |
| 1974 | 10.37 billion | +2.9% |
| 1975 | 10.68 billion | +3.0% |
| 1976 | 11.01 billion | +3.1% |
| 1977 | 11.35 billion | +3.1% |
| 1978 | 11.70 billion | +3.1% |
| 1979 | 12.06 billion | +3.1% |
| 1980 | 12.44 billion | +3.2% |
| 1981 | 12.78 billion | +2.7% |
| 1982 | 13.13 billion | +2.7% |
| 1983 | 13.48 billion | +2.7% |
| 1984 | 13.85 billion | +2.7% |
| 1985 | 14.23 billion | +2.7% |
| 1986 | 14.61 billion | +2.7% |
| 1987 | 15.00 billion | +2.7% |
| 1988 | 15.38 billion | +2.5% |
| 1989 | 15.74 billion | +2.3% |
| 1990 | 16.04 billion | +1.9% |
| 1991 | 16.34 billion | +1.9% |
| 1992 | 16.64 billion | +1.8% |
| 1993 | 16.93 billion | +1.8% |
| 1994 | 17.21 billion | +1.7% |
| 1995 | 17.50 billion | +1.6% |
| 1996 | 17.79 billion | +1.7% |
| 1997 | 18.07 billion | +1.6% |
| 1998 | 18.32 billion | +1.4% |
| 1999 | 18.56 billion | +1.3% |
| 2000 | 18.79 billion | +1.2% |
| 2001 | 19.01 billion | +1.2% |
| 2002 | 19.23 billion | +1.2% |
| 2003 | 19.46 billion | +1.2% |
| 2004 | 19.69 billion | +1.2% |
| 2005 | 19.91 billion | +1.1% |
| 2006 | 20.14 billion | +1.2% |
| 2007 | 20.37 billion | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 20.59 billion | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 20.80 billion | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 21.02 billion | +1.1% |
| 2011 | 21.24 billion | +1.0% |
| 2012 | 21.45 billion | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 21.67 billion | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 21.87 billion | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 22.07 billion | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 22.27 billion | +0.9% |
| 2017 | 22.48 billion | +0.9% |
| 2018 | 22.68 billion | +0.9% |
| 2019 | 22.85 billion | +0.8% |
| 2020 | 23.02 billion | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 23.20 billion | +0.8% |
| 2022 | 23.37 billion | +0.7% |
| 2023 | 23.52 billion | +0.6% |
| 2024 | 23.64 billion | +0.5% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 23.64 billion is above the median for high income countries, which is 374.74 million, 63.1× the median. (68 countries reporting)
- Poland's 23.64 billion is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 736.72 million, 32.1× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 coal in Poland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1801 | +109.0% | 406,704 | 850,048 |
| 1802 | +53.0% | 850,048 | 1.30 million |
| 1803 | +35.5% | 1.30 million | 1.76 million |
| 1804 | +26.0% | 1.76 million | 2.22 million |
| 1805 | +25.7% | 2.22 million | 2.79 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 2.52 million | 406,704 | 4.66 million | 10 |
| 1810s | 7.74 million | 5.23 million | 10.85 million | 10 |
| 1820s | 16.58 million | 11.60 million | 21.96 million | 10 |
| 1830s | 28.02 million | 22.95 million | 34.32 million | 10 |
| 1840s | 47.44 million | 36.28 million | 60.16 million | 10 |
| 1850s | 85.27 million | 63.36 million | 113.51 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 168.36 million | 121.00 million | 227.34 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 344.11 million | 244.01 million | 452.62 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 614.58 million | 478.87 million | 769.72 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.02 billion | 811.31 million | 1.26 billion | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.64 billion | 1.33 billion | 2.00 billion | 10 |
| 1910s | 2.54 billion | 2.09 billion | 2.91 billion | 10 |
| 1920s | 3.25 billion | 2.99 billion | 3.51 billion | 10 |
| 1930s | 3.77 billion | 3.56 billion | 3.99 billion | 10 |
| 1940s | 4.82 billion | 4.15 billion | 5.32 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 6.06 billion | 5.43 billion | 6.78 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 7.94 billion | 6.97 billion | 8.99 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 10.59 billion | 9.26 billion | 12.06 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 14.06 billion | 12.44 billion | 15.74 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 17.34 billion | 16.04 billion | 18.56 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 19.80 billion | 18.79 billion | 20.80 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 21.96 billion | 21.02 billion | 22.85 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 23.35 billion | 23.02 billion | 23.64 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More climate change data for Poland
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 1.05 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,935 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,534 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 15,401 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 550.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 7,175 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 7,089 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 86.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 26.75 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 coal in Poland?
- Cumulative co2 coal in Poland was 23.64 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 coal recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 23.64 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 coal recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 406,704 in 1800.
- How does Poland rank for cumulative co2 coal?
- Poland ranks 8th out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 coal rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 coal. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 225 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).