Cumulative co2 coal in Sweden
Sweden: Cumulative co2 coal was 1.53 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 coal in Sweden, 1834–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 coal in Sweden is 1.53 billion, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 187 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.4% on the previous year and up 5.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 coal in Sweden peaked at 1.53 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 32,976, in 1834.
Sweden ranks 37th of 179 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 coal in Sweden, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1834 | 32,976 | — |
| 1839 | 76,944 | +133.3% |
| 1840 | 117,248 | +52.4% |
| 1841 | 157,552 | +34.4% |
| 1842 | 238,160 | +51.2% |
| 1843 | 296,784 | +24.6% |
| 1844 | 395,712 | +33.3% |
| 1845 | 483,648 | +22.2% |
| 1846 | 564,256 | +16.7% |
| 1847 | 644,864 | +14.3% |
| 1848 | 784,096 | +21.6% |
| 1849 | 978,288 | +24.8% |
| 1850 | 1.18 million | +20.6% |
| 1851 | 1.40 million | +18.3% |
| 1852 | 1.61 million | +15.5% |
| 1853 | 1.84 million | +14.1% |
| 1854 | 2.18 million | +18.3% |
| 1855 | 2.49 million | +14.5% |
| 1856 | 2.97 million | +19.1% |
| 1857 | 3.58 million | +20.6% |
| 1858 | 4.09 million | +14.3% |
| 1859 | 4.85 million | +18.4% |
| 1860 | 5.60 million | +15.5% |
| 1861 | 6.57 million | +17.3% |
| 1862 | 7.55 million | +15.0% |
| 1863 | 8.54 million | +13.1% |
| 1864 | 9.57 million | +12.1% |
| 1865 | 10.65 million | +11.3% |
| 1866 | 11.76 million | +10.4% |
| 1867 | 12.79 million | +8.8% |
| 1868 | 14.00 million | +9.5% |
| 1869 | 15.08 million | +7.7% |
| 1870 | 16.41 million | +8.8% |
| 1871 | 17.82 million | +8.6% |
| 1872 | 19.51 million | +9.5% |
| 1873 | 21.22 million | +8.8% |
| 1874 | 23.07 million | +8.7% |
| 1875 | 25.31 million | +9.7% |
| 1876 | 27.71 million | +9.5% |
| 1877 | 30.25 million | +9.2% |
| 1878 | 32.40 million | +7.1% |
| 1879 | 34.57 million | +6.7% |
| 1880 | 37.36 million | +8.1% |
| 1881 | 40.06 million | +7.2% |
| 1882 | 43.15 million | +7.7% |
| 1883 | 46.31 million | +7.3% |
| 1884 | 49.79 million | +7.5% |
| 1885 | 53.54 million | +7.5% |
| 1886 | 57.21 million | +6.9% |
| 1887 | 60.93 million | +6.5% |
| 1888 | 65.09 million | +6.8% |
| 1889 | 69.91 million | +7.4% |
| 1890 | 74.77 million | +7.0% |
| 1891 | 79.92 million | +6.9% |
| 1892 | 85.05 million | +6.4% |
| 1893 | 90.17 million | +6.0% |
| 1894 | 95.92 million | +6.4% |
| 1895 | 101.70 million | +6.0% |
| 1896 | 107.69 million | +5.9% |
| 1897 | 114.35 million | +6.2% |
| 1898 | 121.45 million | +6.2% |
| 1899 | 130.35 million | +7.3% |
| 1900 | 139.28 million | +6.8% |
| 1901 | 147.56 million | +5.9% |
| 1902 | 156.23 million | +5.9% |
| 1903 | 165.75 million | +6.1% |
| 1904 | 175.77 million | +6.1% |
| 1905 | 185.62 million | +5.6% |
| 1906 | 196.58 million | +5.9% |
| 1907 | 209.01 million | +6.3% |
| 1908 | 222.21 million | +6.3% |
| 1909 | 234.34 million | +5.5% |
| 1910 | 246.90 million | +5.4% |
| 1911 | 259.04 million | +4.9% |
| 1912 | 272.59 million | +5.2% |
| 1913 | 287.80 million | +5.6% |
| 1914 | 302.20 million | +5.0% |
| 1915 | 316.69 million | +4.8% |
| 1916 | 331.95 million | +4.8% |
| 1917 | 338.56 million | +2.0% |
| 1918 | 346.44 million | +2.3% |
| 1919 | 353.62 million | +2.1% |
| 1920 | 363.44 million | +2.8% |
| 1921 | 369.01 million | +1.5% |
| 1922 | 378.41 million | +2.5% |
| 1923 | 389.84 million | +3.0% |
| 1924 | 403.50 million | +3.5% |
| 1925 | 415.47 million | +3.0% |
| 1926 | 426.99 million | +2.8% |
| 1927 | 443.52 million | +3.9% |
| 1928 | 458.18 million | +3.3% |
| 1929 | 475.80 million | +3.8% |
| 1930 | 492.65 million | +3.5% |
| 1931 | 509.38 million | +3.4% |
| 1932 | 525.68 million | +3.2% |
| 1933 | 542.63 million | +3.2% |
| 1934 | 561.58 million | +3.5% |
| 1935 | 581.22 million | +3.5% |
| 1936 | 602.78 million | +3.7% |
| 1937 | 627.66 million | +4.1% |
| 1938 | 649.21 million | +3.4% |
| 1939 | 673.36 million | +3.7% |
| 1940 | 689.83 million | +2.4% |
| 1941 | 704.14 million | +2.1% |
| 1942 | 716.43 million | +1.7% |
| 1943 | 731.36 million | +2.1% |
| 1944 | 742.85 million | +1.6% |
| 1945 | 746.20 million | +0.5% |
| 1946 | 757.22 million | +1.5% |
| 1947 | 772.04 million | +2.0% |
| 1948 | 791.88 million | +2.6% |
| 1949 | 808.53 million | +2.1% |
| 1950 | 826.22 million | +2.2% |
| 1951 | 845.42 million | +2.3% |
| 1952 | 864.30 million | +2.2% |
| 1953 | 879.86 million | +1.8% |
| 1954 | 894.66 million | +1.7% |
| 1955 | 909.45 million | +1.7% |
| 1956 | 923.23 million | +1.5% |
| 1957 | 934.45 million | +1.2% |
| 1958 | 944.83 million | +1.1% |
| 1959 | 954.87 million | +1.1% |
| 1960 | 964.98 million | +1.1% |
| 1961 | 974.37 million | +1.0% |
| 1962 | 983.05 million | +0.9% |
| 1963 | 991.86 million | +0.9% |
| 1964 | 1.00 billion | +0.9% |
| 1965 | 1.01 billion | +0.8% |
| 1966 | 1.02 billion | +0.7% |
| 1967 | 1.02 billion | +0.7% |
| 1968 | 1.03 billion | +0.6% |
| 1969 | 1.04 billion | +0.6% |
| 1970 | 1.04 billion | +0.7% |
| 1971 | 1.05 billion | +0.6% |
| 1972 | 1.06 billion | +0.5% |
| 1973 | 1.06 billion | +0.5% |
| 1974 | 1.07 billion | +0.5% |
| 1975 | 1.07 billion | +0.7% |
| 1976 | 1.08 billion | +0.6% |
| 1977 | 1.09 billion | +0.5% |
| 1978 | 1.09 billion | +0.5% |
| 1979 | 1.10 billion | +0.6% |
| 1980 | 1.10 billion | +0.6% |
| 1981 | 1.11 billion | +0.5% |
| 1982 | 1.12 billion | +0.6% |
| 1983 | 1.13 billion | +0.7% |
| 1984 | 1.13 billion | +0.9% |
| 1985 | 1.15 billion | +1.0% |
| 1986 | 1.16 billion | +1.0% |
| 1987 | 1.17 billion | +1.0% |
| 1988 | 1.18 billion | +0.9% |
| 1989 | 1.19 billion | +0.9% |
| 1990 | 1.20 billion | +1.0% |
| 1991 | 1.21 billion | +1.0% |
| 1992 | 1.23 billion | +0.9% |
| 1993 | 1.24 billion | +0.9% |
| 1994 | 1.25 billion | +0.9% |
| 1995 | 1.26 billion | +0.9% |
| 1996 | 1.27 billion | +1.0% |
| 1997 | 1.28 billion | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 1.29 billion | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 1.30 billion | +0.8% |
| 2000 | 1.31 billion | +0.8% |
| 2001 | 1.32 billion | +0.8% |
| 2002 | 1.34 billion | +0.9% |
| 2003 | 1.35 billion | +0.9% |
| 2004 | 1.36 billion | +0.9% |
| 2005 | 1.37 billion | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 1.38 billion | +0.8% |
| 2007 | 1.39 billion | +0.8% |
| 2008 | 1.40 billion | +0.7% |
| 2009 | 1.41 billion | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 1.42 billion | +0.7% |
| 2011 | 1.43 billion | +0.7% |
| 2012 | 1.44 billion | +0.6% |
| 2013 | 1.45 billion | +0.6% |
| 2014 | 1.46 billion | +0.6% |
| 2015 | 1.46 billion | +0.6% |
| 2016 | 1.47 billion | +0.5% |
| 2017 | 1.48 billion | +0.6% |
| 2018 | 1.49 billion | +0.5% |
| 2019 | 1.50 billion | +0.5% |
| 2020 | 1.50 billion | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 1.51 billion | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 1.52 billion | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 1.52 billion | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 1.53 billion | +0.4% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's 1.53 billion is above the median for high income countries, which is 374.74 million, 4.1× the median. (68 countries reporting)
- Sweden's 1.53 billion is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 736.72 million, 2.1× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 coal in Sweden changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1839 | +133.3% | 32,976 | 76,944 |
| 1840 | +52.4% | 76,944 | 117,248 |
| 1842 | +51.2% | 157,552 | 238,160 |
| 1841 | +34.4% | 117,248 | 157,552 |
| 1844 | +33.3% | 296,784 | 395,712 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 54,960 | 32,976 | 76,944 | 2 |
| 1840s | 466,061 | 117,248 | 978,288 | 10 |
| 1850s | 2.62 million | 1.18 million | 4.85 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 10.21 million | 5.60 million | 15.08 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 24.83 million | 16.41 million | 34.57 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 52.33 million | 37.36 million | 69.91 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 100.14 million | 74.77 million | 130.35 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 183.23 million | 139.28 million | 234.34 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 305.58 million | 246.90 million | 353.62 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 412.42 million | 363.44 million | 475.80 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 576.61 million | 492.65 million | 673.36 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 746.05 million | 689.83 million | 808.53 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 897.73 million | 826.22 million | 954.87 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.00 billion | 964.98 million | 1.04 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.07 billion | 1.04 billion | 1.10 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.14 billion | 1.10 billion | 1.19 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.25 billion | 1.20 billion | 1.30 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.36 billion | 1.31 billion | 1.41 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.46 billion | 1.42 billion | 1.50 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.52 billion | 1.50 billion | 1.53 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
More climate change data for Sweden
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 160.40 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,738 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 983.81 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,754 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.71 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 134.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,196 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,185 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.86 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 4.47 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 coal in Sweden?
- Cumulative co2 coal in Sweden was 1.53 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 coal recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 1.53 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 coal recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 32,976 in 1834.
- How does Sweden rank for cumulative co2 coal?
- Sweden ranks 37th out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 coal rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 coal. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 187 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).