Cumulative co2 coal in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Cumulative co2 coal was 645.31 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 coal in Zimbabwe, 1903–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 coal in Zimbabwe is 645.31 million, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 122 years on record.
The figure is up 1.3% on the previous year and up 11.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 coal in Zimbabwe peaked at 645.31 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 113,584, in 1903.
That places Zimbabwe 52nd out of 179 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 coal in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1903 | 113,584 | — |
| 1904 | 256,480 | +125.8% |
| 1905 | 490,976 | +91.4% |
| 1906 | 743,792 | +51.5% |
| 1907 | 1.02 million | +37.4% |
| 1908 | 1.42 million | +38.7% |
| 1909 | 1.83 million | +28.9% |
| 1910 | 2.26 million | +23.6% |
| 1911 | 2.77 million | +22.7% |
| 1912 | 3.29 million | +18.8% |
| 1913 | 3.88 million | +17.7% |
| 1914 | 4.72 million | +21.7% |
| 1915 | 5.70 million | +20.9% |
| 1916 | 6.89 million | +20.7% |
| 1917 | 8.21 million | +19.2% |
| 1918 | 9.39 million | +14.4% |
| 1919 | 10.62 million | +13.1% |
| 1920 | 12.01 million | +13.1% |
| 1921 | 13.39 million | +11.5% |
| 1922 | 14.63 million | +9.3% |
| 1923 | 16.12 million | +10.1% |
| 1924 | 17.69 million | +9.7% |
| 1925 | 19.51 million | +10.3% |
| 1926 | 21.84 million | +11.9% |
| 1927 | 24.25 million | +11.0% |
| 1928 | 27.15 million | +12.0% |
| 1929 | 29.91 million | +10.1% |
| 1930 | 32.40 million | +8.3% |
| 1931 | 33.95 million | +4.8% |
| 1932 | 35.12 million | +3.4% |
| 1933 | 36.40 million | +3.7% |
| 1934 | 38.11 million | +4.7% |
| 1935 | 39.95 million | +4.8% |
| 1936 | 41.82 million | +4.7% |
| 1937 | 44.55 million | +6.5% |
| 1938 | 47.32 million | +6.2% |
| 1939 | 50.29 million | +6.3% |
| 1940 | 53.71 million | +6.8% |
| 1941 | 57.46 million | +7.0% |
| 1942 | 61.60 million | +7.2% |
| 1943 | 66.32 million | +7.7% |
| 1944 | 71.11 million | +7.2% |
| 1945 | 75.54 million | +6.2% |
| 1946 | 79.82 million | +5.7% |
| 1947 | 83.83 million | +5.0% |
| 1948 | 88.32 million | +5.4% |
| 1949 | 93.41 million | +5.8% |
| 1950 | 96.27 million | +3.1% |
| 1951 | 99.31 million | +3.2% |
| 1952 | 102.70 million | +3.4% |
| 1953 | 106.35 million | +3.6% |
| 1954 | 110.36 million | +3.8% |
| 1955 | 115.10 million | +4.3% |
| 1956 | 120.14 million | +4.4% |
| 1957 | 125.31 million | +4.3% |
| 1958 | 129.68 million | +3.5% |
| 1959 | 134.76 million | +3.9% |
| 1960 | 139.53 million | +3.5% |
| 1961 | 143.44 million | +2.8% |
| 1962 | 147.14 million | +2.6% |
| 1963 | 150.65 million | +2.4% |
| 1964 | 153.83 million | +2.1% |
| 1965 | 157.23 million | +2.2% |
| 1966 | 162.22 million | +3.2% |
| 1967 | 166.40 million | +2.6% |
| 1968 | 171.36 million | +3.0% |
| 1969 | 176.55 million | +3.0% |
| 1970 | 183.10 million | +3.7% |
| 1971 | 190.10 million | +3.8% |
| 1972 | 196.40 million | +3.3% |
| 1973 | 203.58 million | +3.7% |
| 1974 | 210.38 million | +3.3% |
| 1975 | 216.25 million | +2.8% |
| 1976 | 225.19 million | +4.1% |
| 1977 | 232.55 million | +3.3% |
| 1978 | 239.93 million | +3.2% |
| 1979 | 247.67 million | +3.2% |
| 1980 | 255.38 million | +3.1% |
| 1981 | 262.59 million | +2.8% |
| 1982 | 269.66 million | +2.7% |
| 1983 | 278.00 million | +3.1% |
| 1984 | 285.76 million | +2.8% |
| 1985 | 293.81 million | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 304.66 million | +3.7% |
| 1987 | 317.67 million | +4.3% |
| 1988 | 331.07 million | +4.2% |
| 1989 | 344.68 million | +4.1% |
| 1990 | 358.10 million | +3.9% |
| 1991 | 370.87 million | +3.6% |
| 1992 | 384.38 million | +3.6% |
| 1993 | 396.94 million | +3.3% |
| 1994 | 410.49 million | +3.4% |
| 1995 | 421.10 million | +2.6% |
| 1996 | 431.60 million | +2.5% |
| 1997 | 441.10 million | +2.2% |
| 1998 | 450.83 million | +2.2% |
| 1999 | 461.43 million | +2.4% |
| 2000 | 471.55 million | +2.2% |
| 2001 | 481.09 million | +2.0% |
| 2002 | 490.21 million | +1.9% |
| 2003 | 498.39 million | +1.7% |
| 2004 | 505.81 million | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 514.29 million | +1.7% |
| 2006 | 522.47 million | +1.6% |
| 2007 | 530.28 million | +1.5% |
| 2008 | 536.23 million | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 542.57 million | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 549.08 million | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 555.80 million | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 562.80 million | +1.3% |
| 2013 | 569.90 million | +1.3% |
| 2014 | 577.63 million | +1.4% |
| 2015 | 585.31 million | +1.3% |
| 2016 | 592.03 million | +1.1% |
| 2017 | 598.04 million | +1.0% |
| 2018 | 604.52 million | +1.1% |
| 2019 | 610.53 million | +1.0% |
| 2020 | 615.47 million | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 621.40 million | +1.0% |
| 2022 | 628.57 million | +1.2% |
| 2023 | 636.85 million | +1.3% |
| 2024 | 645.31 million | +1.3% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 645.31 million is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 20.26 million, 31.9× the median. (40 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 645.31 million is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3.16 million, 204.0× the median. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 coal in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1904 | +125.8% | 113,584 | 256,480 |
| 1905 | +91.4% | 256,480 | 490,976 |
| 1906 | +51.5% | 490,976 | 743,792 |
| 1908 | +38.7% | 1.02 million | 1.42 million |
| 1907 | +37.4% | 743,792 | 1.02 million |
| 1909 | +28.9% | 1.42 million | 1.83 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 839,057 | 113,584 | 1.83 million | 7 |
| 1910s | 5.77 million | 2.26 million | 10.62 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 19.65 million | 12.01 million | 29.91 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 39.99 million | 32.40 million | 50.29 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 73.11 million | 53.71 million | 93.41 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 114.00 million | 96.27 million | 134.76 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 156.84 million | 139.53 million | 176.55 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 214.52 million | 183.10 million | 247.67 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 294.33 million | 255.38 million | 344.68 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 412.68 million | 358.10 million | 461.43 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 509.29 million | 471.55 million | 542.57 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 580.57 million | 549.08 million | 610.53 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 629.52 million | 615.47 million | 645.31 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 49 Mongolia 719.49 million compare
- 50 Portugal 651.49 million compare
- 51 New Zealand 646.78 million compare
- 53 Norway 627.65 million compare
- 54 Uzbekistan 618.88 million compare
- 55 Switzerland 593.53 million compare
More climate change data for Zimbabwe
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 178.46 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 17,716 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,805 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11,912 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 21.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 425.42 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,483 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,345 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 137.94 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.08 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 coal in Zimbabwe?
- Cumulative co2 coal in Zimbabwe was 645.31 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 coal recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 645.31 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 coal recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 113,584 in 1903.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for cumulative co2 coal?
- Zimbabwe ranks 52nd out of 179 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 coal rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 coal. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 122 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).