Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador
Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate was -0.2533 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-0.2533 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 3.1%
World rank
150th
of 188 countries
All-time high
82.38 % change on previous year
in 1851
All-time low
-0.2533 % change on previous year
in 2024
Years of data
174
1851–2024
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador, 1851–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded -0.2533 % change on previous year for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 174 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.1% on the previous year and down 116.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador peaked at 82.38 % change on previous year in 1851 and was at its lowest, -0.2533 % change on previous year, in 2024.
Ecuador ranks 150th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | 82.38 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 49.25 % change on previous year | -40.2% |
| 1853 | 32.04 % change on previous year | -34.9% |
| 1854 | 28.27 % change on previous year | -11.8% |
| 1855 | 22.91 % change on previous year | -19.0% |
| 1856 | 14.74 % change on previous year | -35.7% |
| 1857 | 17.53 % change on previous year | +18.9% |
| 1858 | 12.71 % change on previous year | -27.5% |
| 1859 | 13.29 % change on previous year | +4.6% |
| 1860 | 12.09 % change on previous year | -9.0% |
| 1861 | 8.16 % change on previous year | -32.6% |
| 1862 | 13.03 % change on previous year | +59.8% |
| 1863 | 6.03 % change on previous year | -53.7% |
| 1864 | 6.34 % change on previous year | +5.1% |
| 1865 | 5.54 % change on previous year | -12.6% |
| 1866 | 6.75 % change on previous year | +21.9% |
| 1867 | 6.04 % change on previous year | -10.6% |
| 1868 | 4.19 % change on previous year | -30.7% |
| 1869 | 7.4 % change on previous year | +76.8% |
| 1870 | 2.64 % change on previous year | -64.3% |
| 1871 | 6.9 % change on previous year | +161.2% |
| 1872 | 8.38 % change on previous year | +21.5% |
| 1873 | 4.9 % change on previous year | -41.6% |
| 1874 | 5.5 % change on previous year | +12.4% |
| 1875 | 3.97 % change on previous year | -27.9% |
| 1876 | 4.13 % change on previous year | +4.3% |
| 1877 | 8.04 % change on previous year | +94.4% |
| 1878 | 7.13 % change on previous year | -11.3% |
| 1879 | 3.43 % change on previous year | -51.9% |
| 1880 | 3.73 % change on previous year | +8.7% |
| 1881 | 2.6 % change on previous year | -30.2% |
| 1882 | 2.55 % change on previous year | -2.1% |
| 1883 | 2.61 % change on previous year | +2.3% |
| 1884 | 4.81 % change on previous year | +84.7% |
| 1885 | 2.94 % change on previous year | -38.9% |
| 1886 | 2.96 % change on previous year | +0.5% |
| 1887 | 3.46 % change on previous year | +17.0% |
| 1888 | 2.69 % change on previous year | -22.1% |
| 1889 | 2.51 % change on previous year | -6.9% |
| 1890 | 5.31 % change on previous year | +111.4% |
| 1891 | 2.73 % change on previous year | -48.5% |
| 1892 | 1.95 % change on previous year | -28.8% |
| 1893 | 2 % change on previous year | +2.9% |
| 1894 | 2.08 % change on previous year | +3.7% |
| 1895 | 2.94 % change on previous year | +41.4% |
| 1896 | 1.73 % change on previous year | -41.2% |
| 1897 | 2.53 % change on previous year | +46.9% |
| 1898 | 2.35 % change on previous year | -7.3% |
| 1899 | 2.19 % change on previous year | -6.7% |
| 1900 | 2.45 % change on previous year | +11.8% |
| 1901 | 2.92 % change on previous year | +19.1% |
| 1902 | 2.96 % change on previous year | +1.4% |
| 1903 | 4.04 % change on previous year | +36.4% |
| 1904 | 2.95 % change on previous year | -26.9% |
| 1905 | 3.24 % change on previous year | +9.8% |
| 1906 | 3.41 % change on previous year | +5.4% |
| 1907 | 1.97 % change on previous year | -42.4% |
| 1908 | 3.07 % change on previous year | +56.3% |
| 1909 | 2.81 % change on previous year | -8.7% |
| 1910 | 2.99 % change on previous year | +6.6% |
| 1911 | 2.31 % change on previous year | -22.8% |
| 1912 | 1.18 % change on previous year | -48.8% |
| 1913 | 2.19 % change on previous year | +85.0% |
| 1914 | 1.71 % change on previous year | -22.1% |
| 1915 | 2.15 % change on previous year | +25.8% |
| 1916 | 2.39 % change on previous year | +11.3% |
| 1917 | 1.85 % change on previous year | -22.4% |
| 1918 | 1.8 % change on previous year | -3.1% |
| 1919 | 2.18 % change on previous year | +21.4% |
| 1920 | 2.05 % change on previous year | -6.1% |
| 1921 | 2.27 % change on previous year | +10.9% |
| 1922 | 0.4986 % change on previous year | -78.1% |
| 1923 | 1.72 % change on previous year | +245.1% |
| 1924 | 1.71 % change on previous year | -0.9% |
| 1925 | 0.6815 % change on previous year | -60.0% |
| 1926 | 2.16 % change on previous year | +217.1% |
| 1927 | 1.03 % change on previous year | -52.1% |
| 1928 | 2.05 % change on previous year | +98.0% |
| 1929 | 0.5159 % change on previous year | -74.8% |
| 1930 | 2.93 % change on previous year | +467.9% |
| 1931 | 4.17 % change on previous year | +42.4% |
| 1932 | 4.97 % change on previous year | +19.3% |
| 1933 | 5.17 % change on previous year | +3.9% |
| 1934 | 6.45 % change on previous year | +24.8% |
| 1935 | 5.36 % change on previous year | -16.9% |
| 1936 | 4.81 % change on previous year | -10.3% |
| 1937 | 5.4 % change on previous year | +12.2% |
| 1938 | 4.68 % change on previous year | -13.2% |
| 1939 | 4.25 % change on previous year | -9.3% |
| 1940 | 3.66 % change on previous year | -13.8% |
| 1941 | 3.35 % change on previous year | -8.4% |
| 1942 | 3.63 % change on previous year | +8.1% |
| 1943 | 3.21 % change on previous year | -11.4% |
| 1944 | 2.86 % change on previous year | -11.1% |
| 1945 | 3.17 % change on previous year | +10.8% |
| 1946 | 2.64 % change on previous year | -16.6% |
| 1947 | 2.82 % change on previous year | +6.8% |
| 1948 | 2.78 % change on previous year | -1.4% |
| 1949 | 2.62 % change on previous year | -5.8% |
| 1950 | 2.75 % change on previous year | +4.9% |
| 1951 | 3.1 % change on previous year | +12.9% |
| 1952 | 2.95 % change on previous year | -5.1% |
| 1953 | 2.91 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 1954 | 3.1 % change on previous year | +6.3% |
| 1955 | 3.04 % change on previous year | -2.0% |
| 1956 | 2.59 % change on previous year | -14.7% |
| 1957 | 2.85 % change on previous year | +9.8% |
| 1958 | 2.83 % change on previous year | -0.6% |
| 1959 | 2.68 % change on previous year | -5.3% |
| 1960 | 4.28 % change on previous year | +59.7% |
| 1961 | 2.19 % change on previous year | -48.8% |
| 1962 | 1.78 % change on previous year | -18.7% |
| 1963 | 1.46 % change on previous year | -18.3% |
| 1964 | 1.44 % change on previous year | -1.2% |
| 1965 | 1.07 % change on previous year | -25.6% |
| 1966 | 0.7132 % change on previous year | -33.4% |
| 1967 | 0.6082 % change on previous year | -14.7% |
| 1968 | 1.45 % change on previous year | +137.8% |
| 1969 | 1.1 % change on previous year | -23.8% |
| 1970 | 1.39 % change on previous year | +26.2% |
| 1971 | 1.27 % change on previous year | -8.7% |
| 1972 | 1.02 % change on previous year | -19.5% |
| 1973 | 1.75 % change on previous year | +71.7% |
| 1974 | 1.81 % change on previous year | +3.5% |
| 1975 | 1.88 % change on previous year | +3.8% |
| 1976 | 2.27 % change on previous year | +20.4% |
| 1977 | 1.69 % change on previous year | -25.5% |
| 1978 | 1.7 % change on previous year | +0.7% |
| 1979 | 2.15 % change on previous year | +26.3% |
| 1980 | 2.68 % change on previous year | +24.9% |
| 1981 | 2.31 % change on previous year | -13.9% |
| 1982 | 1.53 % change on previous year | -34.1% |
| 1983 | 2.07 % change on previous year | +35.7% |
| 1984 | 2.52 % change on previous year | +21.7% |
| 1985 | 2.04 % change on previous year | -18.9% |
| 1986 | 1.57 % change on previous year | -23.1% |
| 1987 | 1.14 % change on previous year | -27.3% |
| 1988 | 0.7259 % change on previous year | -36.4% |
| 1989 | 1.22 % change on previous year | +68.2% |
| 1990 | 1.53 % change on previous year | +24.9% |
| 1991 | 0.9877 % change on previous year | -35.3% |
| 1992 | 0.7916 % change on previous year | -19.9% |
| 1993 | 1.35 % change on previous year | +71.0% |
| 1994 | 0.774 % change on previous year | -42.8% |
| 1995 | 0.5933 % change on previous year | -23.3% |
| 1996 | 0.4903 % change on previous year | -17.4% |
| 1997 | 0.8827 % change on previous year | +80.0% |
| 1998 | 0.7916 % change on previous year | -10.3% |
| 1999 | 0.6951 % change on previous year | -12.2% |
| 2000 | 0.29 % change on previous year | -58.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0828 % change on previous year | -71.4% |
| 2002 | -0.0407 % change on previous year | -149.1% |
| 2003 | 1.46 % change on previous year | -3691.5% |
| 2004 | 0.2737 % change on previous year | -81.3% |
| 2005 | 0.1034 % change on previous year | -62.2% |
| 2006 | 0.111 % change on previous year | +7.4% |
| 2007 | 0.5577 % change on previous year | +402.2% |
| 2008 | 0.3913 % change on previous year | -29.8% |
| 2009 | 0.1866 % change on previous year | -52.3% |
| 2010 | 0.1757 % change on previous year | -5.8% |
| 2011 | 0.6917 % change on previous year | +293.7% |
| 2012 | 0.1892 % change on previous year | -72.6% |
| 2013 | 0.2363 % change on previous year | +24.9% |
| 2014 | 1.51 % change on previous year | +538.7% |
| 2015 | 0.3816 % change on previous year | -74.7% |
| 2016 | 0.3704 % change on previous year | -2.9% |
| 2017 | 0.2185 % change on previous year | -41.0% |
| 2018 | 0.6671 % change on previous year | +205.3% |
| 2019 | 0.5498 % change on previous year | -17.6% |
| 2020 | 0.2625 % change on previous year | -52.2% |
| 2021 | 0.1865 % change on previous year | -29.0% |
| 2022 | 0.1531 % change on previous year | -17.9% |
| 2023 | -0.2456 % change on previous year | -260.4% |
| 2024 | -0.2533 % change on previous year | +3.1% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's -0.2533 % change on previous year is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0301 % change on previous year. (55 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's -0.2533 % change on previous year is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0301 % change on previous year. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | +3691.5% | -0.0407 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year |
| 2014 | +538.7% | 0.2363 % change on previous year | 1.51 % change on previous year |
| 1930 | +467.9% | 0.5159 % change on previous year | 2.93 % change on previous year |
| 2007 | +402.2% | 0.111 % change on previous year | 0.5577 % change on previous year |
| 2011 | +293.7% | 0.1757 % change on previous year | 0.6917 % change on previous year |
| 2023 | -260.4% | 0.1531 % change on previous year | -0.2456 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 30.35 % change on previous year | 12.71 % change on previous year | 82.38 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1860s | 7.56 % change on previous year | 4.19 % change on previous year | 13.03 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 5.5 % change on previous year | 2.64 % change on previous year | 8.38 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 3.09 % change on previous year | 2.51 % change on previous year | 4.81 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.58 % change on previous year | 1.73 % change on previous year | 5.31 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 2.98 % change on previous year | 1.97 % change on previous year | 4.04 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 2.08 % change on previous year | 1.18 % change on previous year | 2.99 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.47 % change on previous year | 0.4986 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 4.82 % change on previous year | 2.93 % change on previous year | 6.45 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 3.07 % change on previous year | 2.62 % change on previous year | 3.66 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 2.88 % change on previous year | 2.59 % change on previous year | 3.1 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.61 % change on previous year | 0.6082 % change on previous year | 4.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.69 % change on previous year | 1.02 % change on previous year | 2.27 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.78 % change on previous year | 0.7259 % change on previous year | 2.68 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8885 % change on previous year | 0.4903 % change on previous year | 1.53 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3417 % change on previous year | -0.0407 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.499 % change on previous year | 0.1757 % change on previous year | 1.51 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0207 % change on previous year | -0.2533 % change on previous year | 0.2625 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 147 Antigua and Barbuda -0.2289 % change on previous year compare
- 148 Tunisia -0.2374 % change on previous year compare
- 149 Trinidad and Tobago -0.2531 % change on previous year compare
- 151 Mexico -0.263 % change on previous year compare
- 152 Austria -0.2684 % change on previous year compare
- 153 Croatia -0.2761 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Ecuador
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 218.44 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,195 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,758 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14,437 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.95 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 515.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,911 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,488 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,423 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.62 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador?
- Cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador was -0.2533 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 82.38 % change on previous year in 1851.
- What is the lowest cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.2533 % change on previous year in 2024.
- How does Ecuador rank for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Ecuador ranks 150th out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 116.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 174 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.