Cumulative co2 flaring in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Cumulative co2 flaring was 375.06 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
375.06 million
Change on year
up 2.7%
World rank
15th
of 215 countries
All-time high
375.06 million
in 2024
All-time low
0
in 1830
Years of data
173
1830–2024
Cumulative co2 flaring in Kazakhstan, 1830–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 flaring in Kazakhstan stood at 375.06 million. That is the highest value across all 173 years on record.
The figure is up 2.7% on the previous year and up 41.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 flaring in Kazakhstan peaked at 375.06 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1830.
That places Kazakhstan 15th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 flaring in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1830 | 0 | — |
| 1831 | 0 | — |
| 1832 | 0 | — |
| 1833 | 0 | — |
| 1850 | 0 | — |
| 1855 | 0 | — |
| 1858 | 0 | — |
| 1859 | 0 | — |
| 1860 | 0 | — |
| 1861 | 0 | — |
| 1862 | 0 | — |
| 1863 | 0 | — |
| 1864 | 0 | — |
| 1865 | 0 | — |
| 1866 | 0 | — |
| 1867 | 0 | — |
| 1868 | 0 | — |
| 1869 | 0 | — |
| 1870 | 0 | — |
| 1871 | 0 | — |
| 1872 | 0 | — |
| 1873 | 0 | — |
| 1874 | 0 | — |
| 1875 | 0 | — |
| 1876 | 0 | — |
| 1877 | 0 | — |
| 1878 | 0 | — |
| 1879 | 0 | — |
| 1880 | 0 | — |
| 1881 | 0 | — |
| 1882 | 0 | — |
| 1883 | 0 | — |
| 1884 | 0 | — |
| 1885 | 0 | — |
| 1886 | 0 | — |
| 1887 | 0 | — |
| 1888 | 0 | — |
| 1889 | 0 | — |
| 1890 | 0 | — |
| 1891 | 0 | — |
| 1892 | 0 | — |
| 1893 | 0 | — |
| 1894 | 0 | — |
| 1895 | 0 | — |
| 1896 | 0 | — |
| 1897 | 0 | — |
| 1898 | 0 | — |
| 1899 | 0 | — |
| 1900 | 0 | — |
| 1901 | 0 | — |
| 1902 | 0 | — |
| 1903 | 0 | — |
| 1904 | 0 | — |
| 1905 | 0 | — |
| 1906 | 0 | — |
| 1907 | 0 | — |
| 1908 | 0 | — |
| 1909 | 0 | — |
| 1910 | 0 | — |
| 1911 | 0 | — |
| 1912 | 0 | — |
| 1913 | 0 | — |
| 1914 | 0 | — |
| 1915 | 0 | — |
| 1916 | 0 | — |
| 1917 | 0 | — |
| 1918 | 0 | — |
| 1919 | 0 | — |
| 1920 | 0 | — |
| 1921 | 0 | — |
| 1922 | 0 | — |
| 1923 | 0 | — |
| 1924 | 0 | — |
| 1925 | 0 | — |
| 1926 | 0 | — |
| 1927 | 0 | — |
| 1928 | 0 | — |
| 1929 | 0 | — |
| 1930 | 0 | — |
| 1931 | 0 | — |
| 1932 | 0 | — |
| 1933 | 0 | — |
| 1934 | 0 | — |
| 1935 | 0 | — |
| 1936 | 0 | — |
| 1937 | 0 | — |
| 1938 | 0 | — |
| 1939 | 0 | — |
| 1940 | 0 | — |
| 1941 | 0 | — |
| 1942 | 0 | — |
| 1943 | 0 | — |
| 1944 | 0 | — |
| 1945 | 0 | — |
| 1946 | 0 | — |
| 1947 | 0 | — |
| 1948 | 0 | — |
| 1949 | 0 | — |
| 1950 | 0 | — |
| 1951 | 0 | — |
| 1952 | 0 | — |
| 1953 | 0 | — |
| 1954 | 0 | — |
| 1955 | 0 | — |
| 1956 | 0 | — |
| 1957 | 0 | — |
| 1958 | 0 | — |
| 1959 | 0 | — |
| 1960 | 0 | — |
| 1961 | 0 | — |
| 1962 | 0 | — |
| 1963 | 0 | — |
| 1964 | 0 | — |
| 1965 | 0 | — |
| 1966 | 0 | — |
| 1967 | 0 | — |
| 1968 | 0 | — |
| 1969 | 0 | — |
| 1970 | 0 | — |
| 1971 | 1.18 million | — |
| 1972 | 2.31 million | +96.4% |
| 1973 | 3.68 million | +59.1% |
| 1974 | 5.20 million | +41.4% |
| 1975 | 6.91 million | +32.9% |
| 1976 | 8.83 million | +27.7% |
| 1977 | 10.92 million | +23.7% |
| 1978 | 13.20 million | +20.9% |
| 1979 | 14.45 million | +9.5% |
| 1980 | 15.69 million | +8.6% |
| 1981 | 16.98 million | +8.2% |
| 1982 | 18.26 million | +7.6% |
| 1983 | 19.55 million | +7.0% |
| 1984 | 20.84 million | +6.6% |
| 1985 | 22.18 million | +6.5% |
| 1986 | 23.36 million | +5.3% |
| 1987 | 24.44 million | +4.6% |
| 1988 | 26.82 million | +9.7% |
| 1989 | 29.14 million | +8.6% |
| 1990 | 35.74 million | +22.6% |
| 1991 | 42.27 million | +18.3% |
| 1992 | 48.50 million | +14.7% |
| 1993 | 54.05 million | +11.4% |
| 1994 | 59.11 million | +9.4% |
| 1995 | 63.92 million | +8.1% |
| 1996 | 69.08 million | +8.1% |
| 1997 | 74.63 million | +8.0% |
| 1998 | 81.28 million | +8.9% |
| 1999 | 87.41 million | +7.5% |
| 2000 | 94.35 million | +7.9% |
| 2001 | 102.19 million | +8.3% |
| 2002 | 111.11 million | +8.7% |
| 2003 | 120.85 million | +8.8% |
| 2004 | 131.71 million | +9.0% |
| 2005 | 142.69 million | +8.3% |
| 2006 | 154.43 million | +8.2% |
| 2007 | 166.29 million | +7.7% |
| 2008 | 178.90 million | +7.6% |
| 2009 | 192.16 million | +7.4% |
| 2010 | 206.17 million | +7.3% |
| 2011 | 220.31 million | +6.9% |
| 2012 | 234.43 million | +6.4% |
| 2013 | 249.33 million | +6.4% |
| 2014 | 264.23 million | +6.0% |
| 2015 | 278.52 million | +5.4% |
| 2016 | 290.85 million | +4.4% |
| 2017 | 303.17 million | +4.2% |
| 2018 | 315.21 million | +4.0% |
| 2019 | 325.35 million | +3.2% |
| 2020 | 334.72 million | +2.9% |
| 2021 | 345.34 million | +3.2% |
| 2022 | 355.25 million | +2.9% |
| 2023 | 365.15 million | +2.8% |
| 2024 | 375.06 million | +2.7% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 375.06 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.09 million, 344.3× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 375.06 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 5.26 million, 71.3× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 flaring in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1972 | +96.4% | 1.18 million | 2.31 million |
| 1973 | +59.1% | 2.31 million | 3.68 million |
| 1974 | +41.4% | 3.68 million | 5.20 million |
| 1975 | +32.9% | 5.20 million | 6.91 million |
| 1976 | +27.7% | 6.91 million | 8.83 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1970s | 6.67 million | 0 | 14.45 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 21.73 million | 15.69 million | 29.14 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 61.60 million | 35.74 million | 87.41 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 139.47 million | 94.35 million | 192.16 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 268.76 million | 206.17 million | 325.35 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 355.10 million | 334.72 million | 375.06 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 flaring in Kazakhstan?
- Cumulative co2 flaring in Kazakhstan was 375.06 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 flaring recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 375.06 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 flaring recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1830.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for cumulative co2 flaring?
- Kazakhstan ranks 15th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 flaring rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 41.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 flaring. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).