Cumulative co2 including land in Cuba
Cuba: Cumulative co2 including land was 5.80 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
5.80 billion
Change on year
up 0.4%
World rank
56th
of 194 countries
All-time high
5.80 billion
in 2024
All-time low
3.47 million
in 1856
Years of data
169
1856–2024
Cumulative co2 including land in Cuba, 1856–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 5.80 billion for cumulative co2 including land in 2024. That is the highest value across all 169 years on record.
The figure is up 0.4% on the previous year and up 4.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 including land in Cuba peaked at 5.80 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 3.47 million, in 1856.
Cuba ranks 56th of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 including land in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 3.47 million | — |
| 1857 | 6.84 million | +97.2% |
| 1858 | 10.13 million | +48.1% |
| 1859 | 13.33 million | +31.7% |
| 1860 | 16.45 million | +23.4% |
| 1861 | 19.67 million | +19.6% |
| 1862 | 23.00 million | +16.9% |
| 1863 | 26.09 million | +13.4% |
| 1864 | 29.38 million | +12.6% |
| 1865 | 32.63 million | +11.1% |
| 1866 | 35.89 million | +10.0% |
| 1867 | 39.14 million | +9.1% |
| 1868 | 42.35 million | +8.2% |
| 1869 | 45.64 million | +7.8% |
| 1870 | 49.09 million | +7.6% |
| 1871 | 52.61 million | +7.2% |
| 1872 | 56.18 million | +6.8% |
| 1873 | 59.80 million | +6.4% |
| 1874 | 63.45 million | +6.1% |
| 1875 | 67.12 million | +5.8% |
| 1876 | 70.71 million | +5.3% |
| 1877 | 74.34 million | +5.1% |
| 1878 | 78.07 million | +5.0% |
| 1879 | 81.82 million | +4.8% |
| 1880 | 85.56 million | +4.6% |
| 1881 | 89.35 million | +4.4% |
| 1882 | 93.18 million | +4.3% |
| 1883 | 97.00 million | +4.1% |
| 1884 | 100.83 million | +3.9% |
| 1885 | 104.70 million | +3.8% |
| 1886 | 108.54 million | +3.7% |
| 1887 | 112.46 million | +3.6% |
| 1888 | 116.47 million | +3.6% |
| 1889 | 120.56 million | +3.5% |
| 1890 | 124.71 million | +3.4% |
| 1891 | 129.05 million | +3.5% |
| 1892 | 133.50 million | +3.4% |
| 1893 | 137.91 million | +3.3% |
| 1894 | 142.41 million | +3.3% |
| 1895 | 146.88 million | +3.1% |
| 1896 | 151.17 million | +2.9% |
| 1897 | 155.43 million | +2.8% |
| 1898 | 159.77 million | +2.8% |
| 1899 | 164.24 million | +2.8% |
| 1900 | 173.82 million | +5.8% |
| 1901 | 185.47 million | +6.7% |
| 1902 | 198.20 million | +6.9% |
| 1903 | 211.88 million | +6.9% |
| 1904 | 226.23 million | +6.8% |
| 1905 | 241.28 million | +6.7% |
| 1906 | 256.90 million | +6.5% |
| 1907 | 272.85 million | +6.2% |
| 1908 | 288.99 million | +5.9% |
| 1909 | 305.45 million | +5.7% |
| 1910 | 326.22 million | +6.8% |
| 1911 | 349.02 million | +7.0% |
| 1912 | 373.24 million | +6.9% |
| 1913 | 398.11 million | +6.7% |
| 1914 | 423.22 million | +6.3% |
| 1915 | 448.84 million | +6.1% |
| 1916 | 475.31 million | +5.9% |
| 1917 | 502.42 million | +5.7% |
| 1918 | 529.69 million | +5.4% |
| 1919 | 555.97 million | +5.0% |
| 1920 | 584.51 million | +5.1% |
| 1921 | 611.54 million | +4.6% |
| 1922 | 638.79 million | +4.5% |
| 1923 | 666.73 million | +4.4% |
| 1924 | 694.63 million | +4.2% |
| 1925 | 722.82 million | +4.1% |
| 1926 | 751.08 million | +3.9% |
| 1927 | 779.47 million | +3.8% |
| 1928 | 807.90 million | +3.6% |
| 1929 | 835.67 million | +3.4% |
| 1930 | 857.50 million | +2.6% |
| 1931 | 876.55 million | +2.2% |
| 1932 | 894.09 million | +2.0% |
| 1933 | 910.78 million | +1.9% |
| 1934 | 926.94 million | +1.8% |
| 1935 | 942.63 million | +1.7% |
| 1936 | 958.11 million | +1.6% |
| 1937 | 973.38 million | +1.6% |
| 1938 | 988.32 million | +1.5% |
| 1939 | 1.00 billion | +1.5% |
| 1940 | 1.03 billion | +2.9% |
| 1941 | 1.07 billion | +3.4% |
| 1942 | 1.11 billion | +3.6% |
| 1943 | 1.15 billion | +3.7% |
| 1944 | 1.19 billion | +3.6% |
| 1945 | 1.23 billion | +3.6% |
| 1946 | 1.27 billion | +3.5% |
| 1947 | 1.32 billion | +3.5% |
| 1948 | 1.36 billion | +3.4% |
| 1949 | 1.41 billion | +3.3% |
| 1950 | 1.48 billion | +5.3% |
| 1951 | 1.55 billion | +4.9% |
| 1952 | 1.70 billion | +9.3% |
| 1953 | 1.77 billion | +4.3% |
| 1954 | 1.83 billion | +3.4% |
| 1955 | 1.88 billion | +2.3% |
| 1956 | 1.91 billion | +1.7% |
| 1957 | 1.94 billion | +1.8% |
| 1958 | 1.98 billion | +2.0% |
| 1959 | 2.01 billion | +1.6% |
| 1960 | 2.04 billion | +1.2% |
| 1961 | 2.12 billion | +3.8% |
| 1962 | 2.22 billion | +4.7% |
| 1963 | 2.43 billion | +9.6% |
| 1964 | 2.53 billion | +4.0% |
| 1965 | 2.58 billion | +2.3% |
| 1966 | 2.67 billion | +3.1% |
| 1967 | 2.76 billion | +3.6% |
| 1968 | 2.84 billion | +2.8% |
| 1969 | 2.96 billion | +4.5% |
| 1970 | 3.05 billion | +2.9% |
| 1971 | 3.23 billion | +6.0% |
| 1972 | 3.40 billion | +5.0% |
| 1973 | 3.48 billion | +2.6% |
| 1974 | 3.59 billion | +3.1% |
| 1975 | 3.71 billion | +3.3% |
| 1976 | 3.79 billion | +2.2% |
| 1977 | 3.85 billion | +1.7% |
| 1978 | 3.91 billion | +1.4% |
| 1979 | 3.97 billion | +1.6% |
| 1980 | 4.02 billion | +1.3% |
| 1981 | 4.09 billion | +1.9% |
| 1982 | 4.17 billion | +1.9% |
| 1983 | 4.23 billion | +1.4% |
| 1984 | 4.30 billion | +1.6% |
| 1985 | 4.40 billion | +2.3% |
| 1986 | 4.52 billion | +2.8% |
| 1987 | 4.61 billion | +2.0% |
| 1988 | 4.68 billion | +1.5% |
| 1989 | 4.74 billion | +1.3% |
| 1990 | 4.79 billion | +1.1% |
| 1991 | 4.86 billion | +1.3% |
| 1992 | 4.90 billion | +0.9% |
| 1993 | 4.94 billion | +0.7% |
| 1994 | 4.97 billion | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 5.00 billion | +0.6% |
| 1996 | 5.06 billion | +1.1% |
| 1997 | 5.09 billion | +0.7% |
| 1998 | 5.13 billion | +0.8% |
| 1999 | 5.16 billion | +0.6% |
| 2000 | 5.22 billion | +1.2% |
| 2001 | 5.26 billion | +0.7% |
| 2002 | 5.29 billion | +0.6% |
| 2003 | 5.32 billion | +0.5% |
| 2004 | 5.36 billion | +0.7% |
| 2005 | 5.39 billion | +0.6% |
| 2006 | 5.41 billion | +0.5% |
| 2007 | 5.43 billion | +0.4% |
| 2008 | 5.45 billion | +0.4% |
| 2009 | 5.47 billion | +0.4% |
| 2010 | 5.50 billion | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 5.51 billion | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 5.53 billion | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 5.55 billion | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 5.56 billion | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 5.58 billion | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 5.61 billion | +0.6% |
| 2017 | 5.64 billion | +0.4% |
| 2018 | 5.67 billion | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 5.69 billion | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 5.71 billion | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 5.73 billion | +0.3% |
| 2022 | 5.75 billion | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 5.77 billion | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 5.80 billion | +0.4% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 5.80 billion is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2.16 billion, 2.7× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 5.80 billion is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.47 billion, 2.3× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 including land in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1857 | +97.2% | 3.47 million | 6.84 million |
| 1858 | +48.1% | 6.84 million | 10.13 million |
| 1859 | +31.7% | 10.13 million | 13.33 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 8.44 million | 3.47 million | 13.33 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 31.03 million | 16.45 million | 45.64 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 65.32 million | 49.09 million | 81.82 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 102.86 million | 85.56 million | 120.56 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 144.51 million | 124.71 million | 164.24 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 236.11 million | 173.82 million | 305.45 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 438.21 million | 326.22 million | 555.97 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 709.31 million | 584.51 million | 835.67 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 933.12 million | 857.50 million | 1.00 billion | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.21 billion | 1.03 billion | 1.41 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.81 billion | 1.48 billion | 2.01 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.51 billion | 2.04 billion | 2.96 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 3.60 billion | 3.05 billion | 3.97 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.38 billion | 4.02 billion | 4.74 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.99 billion | 4.79 billion | 5.16 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 5.36 billion | 5.22 billion | 5.47 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.58 billion | 5.50 billion | 5.69 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.75 billion | 5.71 billion | 5.80 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 including land in Cuba?
- Cumulative co2 including land in Cuba was 5.80 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 including land recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 5.80 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 including land recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.47 million in 1856.
- How does Cuba rank for cumulative co2 including land?
- Cuba ranks 56th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 including land rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 including land. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).