Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre (CO2 square) in Uruguay

Uruguay: Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre (CO2 square) was 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
Change on year
up 42.3%
World rank
97th
of 118 countries
All-time high
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2018
All-time low
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2016
Years of data
10
2014–2023

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre in Uruguay, 2014–2023

000002014201820232014: 0 kt per square kilometre2015: 0 kt per square kilometre2016: 0 kt per square kilometre2017: 0 kt per square kilometre2018: 0 kt per square kilometre2019: 0 kt per square kilometre2020: 0 kt per square kilometre2021: 0 kt per square kilometre2022: 0 kt per square kilometre2023: 0 kt per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.

Analysis

Uruguay recorded 0.0001 kt per square kilometre for food packaging — emissions (co2), per square kilometre in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 42.3% on the previous year and up 449.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, food packaging — emissions (co2), per square kilometre in Uruguay peaked at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2016.

That places Uruguay 97th out of 118 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre (CO2 square) in Uruguay, year by year

Annual values for Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre in Uruguay, 2014 to 2023.
Year kt per square kilometre Change
2014 0 kt per square kilometre —
2015 0 kt per square kilometre +20.3%
2016 0 kt per square kilometre -29.0%
2017 0.0001 kt per square kilometre +500.0%
2018 0.0001 kt per square kilometre +64.2%
2019 0.0001 kt per square kilometre -43.6%
2020 0.0001 kt per square kilometre -4.1%
2021 0.0001 kt per square kilometre -7.8%
2022 0 kt per square kilometre -8.1%
2023 0.0001 kt per square kilometre +42.3%

Uruguay compared with similar countries

  • Uruguay's 0.0001 kt per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0023 kt per square kilometre, 3% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
  • Uruguay's 0.0001 kt per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0005 kt per square kilometre, 13% of the median. (16 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 6
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Uruguay

  1. 94 Zimbabwe 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare
  2. 95 Malawi 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare
  3. 96 Cote d'Ivoire 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare
  4. 98 Palestine 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare
  5. 99 Nigeria 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare
  6. 100 United Arab Emirates 0.0001 kt per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 119 places →

More climate change data for Uruguay

All data for Uruguay →

Frequently asked questions

What is food packaging — emissions (co2), per square kilometre in Uruguay?
Food packaging — emissions (co2), per square kilometre in Uruguay was 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest food packaging — emissions (co2), per square kilometre recorded in Uruguay?
The highest recorded value was 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in 2018.
What is the lowest food packaging — emissions (co2), per square kilometre recorded in Uruguay?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2016.
How does Uruguay rank for food packaging — emissions (co2), per square kilometre?
Uruguay ranks 97th out of 118 countries with data for 2023.
Is food packaging — emissions (co2), per square kilometre rising or falling in Uruguay?
Over the last ten years it is up 449.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre in Uruguay. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/food-packaging-emissions-co2-per-square-kilometre/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/food-packaging-emissions-co2-per-square-kilometre/uruguay/">Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre in Uruguay</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
119 places, 3,473 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Packaging — Emissions (CO2) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.