Food Retail — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Lithuania
Lithuania: Food Retail — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Food Retail — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Lithuania, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, food retail — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Lithuania stood at 0 kt per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.9% on the previous year and down 6.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, food retail — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Lithuania peaked at 0 kt per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2012.
Lithuania ranks 83rd of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 32 years of available data.
Food Retail — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | kt per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1994 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1995 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 1996 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2019 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 2022 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2023 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -1.9% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 0 kt per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 kt per square kilometre, 56% of the median. (65 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 0 kt per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 kt per square kilometre, 1.0× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More climate change data for Lithuania
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 120.73 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,997 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 590.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,407 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.23 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 85.96 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 854.17 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 843.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.18 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is food retail — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Lithuania?
- Food retail — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Lithuania was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest food retail — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest food retail — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does Lithuania rank for food retail — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
- Lithuania ranks 83rd out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is food retail — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Food Retail — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Food Retail — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Food Retail — Emissions (CH4) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Food Retail — Emissions Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Food Retail — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.