Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded 0 ha per US$ of GDP for forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp in 2024.
The figure is up 92.0% on the previous year and down 74.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2021.
Zimbabwe ranks 30th of 183 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +28.0% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -47.8% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +85.4% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +54.2% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -39.7% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -93.4% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +1375.5% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -65.7% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +49.3% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +73.1% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +48.9% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +87.6% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +11.5% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -64.9% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +47.0% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -41.1% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +13.9% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -23.7% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -33.0% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +74.7% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -34.3% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -78.0% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +160.5% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -21.7% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -68.6% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -65.9% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +300.4% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -38.4% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +92.0% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 5.0× the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 3.1× the median. (43 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | +1375.5% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More climate change data for Zimbabwe
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 178.46 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 17,716 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,805 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11,912 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 21.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 425.42 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,483 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,345 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 137.94 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.08 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe?
- Forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp in Zimbabwe was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- What is the lowest forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2021.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Zimbabwe ranks 30th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
- Is forest fires — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 74.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Forest fires — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Forest fires — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Forest fires — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Forest fires — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Forest fires — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.