Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0 kt per square kilometre
Change on year
down 80.2%
World rank
92nd
of 186 countries
All-time high
0 kt per square kilometre
in 1997
All-time low
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2017
Years of data
32
1992–2023
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 0 kt per square kilometre for forest fires — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in 2023.
That represents a change of down 80.2% on the previous year and up 916.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, forest fires — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan peaked at 0 kt per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2017.
That places Kazakhstan 92nd out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | kt per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +314.6% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +141.9% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -35.1% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -97.5% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +493.0% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -73.3% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -73.5% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -61.1% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +1985.7% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -88.4% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -85.3% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +328.6% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -82.4% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +3200.0% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -75.8% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2019 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +350.0% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2022 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2023 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -80.2% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0 kt per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 kt per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | +3200.0% | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre |
| 2007 | +1985.7% | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 89 Sri Lanka 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 90 Latvia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 91 Sudan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 93 Romania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 94 Mongolia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Aruba 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Afghanistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Andorra 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 United Arab Emirates 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 American Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Antigua and Barbuda 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Austria 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Azerbaijan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Belgium 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Burkina Faso 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Bahrain 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Bermuda 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Barbados 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Botswana 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Switzerland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Comoros 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Cayman Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Cyprus 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Czechia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Germany 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Djibouti 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Dominica 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Denmark 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Egypt 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Eritrea 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Estonia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Finland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Faroe Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Gibraltar 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Gambia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Grenada 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Greenland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Guam 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Isle of Man 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Ireland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Iraq 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Iceland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Israel 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Jamaica 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Jordan 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Kiribati 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Kuwait 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Lebanon 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Libya 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Saint Lucia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Liechtenstein 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Lesotho 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Lithuania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Luxembourg 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Maldives 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Marshall Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Mali 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Malta 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Montenegro 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Mauritania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Mauritius 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Niger 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Norway 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Oman 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Pakistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Palau 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Poland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Puerto Rico 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Palestine 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 French Polynesia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Qatar 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Saudi Arabia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Singapore 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Solomon Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Somalia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Serbia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Slovakia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Slovenia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Sweden 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Seychelles 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Tajikistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Turkmenistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Tonga 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Trinidad and Tobago 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Tuvalu 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Uzbekistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 British Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 95 Vanuatu 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 95 Yemen 0 kt per square kilometre
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is forest fires — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan?
- Forest fires — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest forest fires — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest forest fires — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for forest fires — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
- Kazakhstan ranks 92nd out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is forest fires — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 916.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Forest fires — Emissions Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.