Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 in Namibia
Namibia: Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 was 0 kt in 2024. ▬ Flat
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 in Namibia, 1990–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in kt.
Analysis
In 2024, humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 in Namibia stood at 0 kt. That is the highest value across all 35 years on record.
Over the whole period, humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 in Namibia peaked at 0 kt in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0 kt, in 1990.
Namibia ranks 79th of 234 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | 5 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
- 78 Burundi 0.0027 kt compare
- 79 Afghanistan 0 kt compare
- 79 Albania 0 kt compare
- 79 Algeria 0 kt compare
- 79 Andorra 0 kt compare
- 79 Anguilla 0 kt compare
- 79 Antigua and Barbuda 0 kt compare
- 79 Armenia 0 kt compare
- 79 Aruba 0 kt compare
- 79 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 kt compare
- 79 Austria 0 kt compare
- 79 Azerbaijan 0 kt compare
- 79 Bahrain 0 kt compare
- 79 Barbados 0 kt compare
- 79 Belarus 0 kt compare
- 79 Belgium 0 kt compare
- 79 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 kt compare
- 79 Bermuda 0 kt compare
- 79 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 kt compare
- 79 Botswana 0 kt compare
- 79 British Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Bulgaria 0 kt compare
- 79 Burkina Faso 0 kt compare
- 79 Cabo Verde 0 kt compare
- 79 Canada 0 kt compare
- 79 Cayman Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Chile 0 kt compare
- 79 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 kt compare
- 79 China, Macao SAR 0 kt compare
- 79 China, Taiwan Province of 0 kt compare
- 79 Cook Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Croatia 0 kt compare
- 79 Cyprus 0 kt compare
- 79 Czechia 0 kt compare
- 79 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 kt compare
- 79 Denmark 0 kt compare
- 79 Djibouti 0 kt compare
- 79 Dominica 0 kt compare
- 79 Egypt 0 kt compare
- 79 Eritrea 0 kt compare
- 79 Estonia 0 kt compare
- 79 Eswatini 0 kt compare
- 79 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0 kt compare
- 79 Faroe Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Finland 0 kt compare
- 79 France 0 kt compare
- 79 French Polynesia 0 kt compare
- 79 Gambia 0 kt compare
- 79 Georgia 0 kt compare
- 79 Germany 0 kt compare
- 79 Gibraltar 0 kt compare
- 79 Greece 0 kt compare
- 79 Greenland 0 kt compare
- 79 Grenada 0 kt compare
- 79 Guadeloupe 0 kt compare
- 79 Guam 0 kt compare
- 79 Haiti 0 kt compare
- 79 Hungary 0 kt compare
- 79 Iceland 0 kt compare
- 79 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 kt compare
- 79 Iraq 0 kt compare
- 79 Ireland 0 kt compare
- 79 Isle of Man 0 kt compare
- 79 Israel 0 kt compare
- 79 Italy 0 kt compare
- 79 Jamaica 0 kt compare
- 79 Japan 0 kt compare
- 79 Jordan 0 kt compare
- 79 Kazakhstan 0 kt compare
- 79 Kiribati 0 kt compare
- 79 Kuwait 0 kt compare
- 79 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt compare
- 79 Latvia 0 kt compare
- 79 Lebanon 0 kt compare
- 79 Lesotho 0 kt compare
- 79 Libya 0 kt compare
- 79 Lithuania 0 kt compare
- 79 Luxembourg 0 kt compare
- 79 Maldives 0 kt compare
- 79 Malta 0 kt compare
- 79 Marshall Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Martinique 0 kt compare
- 79 Mauritania 0 kt compare
- 79 Mauritius 0 kt compare
- 79 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 kt compare
- 79 Mongolia 0 kt compare
- 79 Montenegro 0 kt compare
- 79 Montserrat 0 kt compare
- 79 Morocco 0 kt compare
- 79 Naoero 0 kt compare
- 79 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 kt compare
- 79 Netherlands Antilles (former) 0 kt compare
- 79 New Zealand 0 kt compare
- 79 Niger 0 kt compare
- 79 Niue 0 kt compare
- 79 Norfolk Island 0 kt compare
- 79 North Macedonia 0 kt compare
- 79 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Norway 0 kt compare
- 79 Oman 0 kt compare
- 79 Pakistan 0 kt compare
- 79 Palau 0 kt compare
- 79 Palestine 0 kt compare
- 79 Pitcairn 0 kt compare
- 79 Poland 0 kt compare
- 79 Portugal 0 kt compare
- 79 Puerto Rico 0 kt compare
- 79 Qatar 0 kt compare
- 79 Republic of Korea 0 kt compare
- 79 Republic of Moldova 0 kt compare
- 79 Romania 0 kt compare
- 79 Russian Federation 0 kt compare
- 79 Rwanda 0 kt compare
- 79 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt compare
- 79 Saint Lucia 0 kt compare
- 79 Saint Pierre and Miquelon 0 kt compare
- 79 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt compare
- 79 Samoa 0 kt compare
- 79 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt compare
- 79 Saudi Arabia 0 kt compare
- 79 Serbia 0 kt compare
- 79 Serbia and Montenegro 0 kt compare
- 79 Seychelles 0 kt compare
- 79 Singapore 0 kt compare
- 79 Slovakia 0 kt compare
- 79 Slovenia 0 kt compare
- 79 Solomon Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Somalia 0 kt compare
- 79 Spain 0 kt compare
- 79 Sri Lanka 0 kt compare
- 79 Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Sweden 0 kt compare
- 79 Switzerland 0 kt compare
- 79 Syrian Arab Republic 0 kt compare
- 79 Tajikistan 0 kt compare
- 79 Timor-Leste 0 kt compare
- 79 Tokelau 0 kt compare
- 79 Tonga 0 kt compare
- 79 Tunisia 0 kt compare
- 79 Türkiye 0 kt compare
- 79 Turkmenistan 0 kt compare
- 79 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Tuvalu 0 kt compare
- 79 Ukraine 0 kt compare
- 79 United Arab Emirates 0 kt compare
- 79 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 kt compare
- 79 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Uruguay 0 kt compare
- 79 Uzbekistan 0 kt compare
- 79 Vanuatu 0 kt compare
- 79 Wallis and Futuna Islands 0 kt compare
- 79 Western Sahara 0 kt compare
- 79 Yemen 0 kt compare
- 79 Zimbabwe 0 kt compare
- 79 Micronesia 0 kt compare
- 79 Polynesia 0 kt compare
More climate change data for Namibia
- Share co2 vs population 0.0579 (2100)
- Population growth 2.0% (2025)
- Population, total 3.09 million (2025)
- Urban population growth 3.0% (2025)
- Urban population 1.57 million (2025)
- Urban population 50.9% (2025)
- Co2 emissions vs gdp 1.14 (2024)
- Cumulative co emissions 87.20 million (2024)
- Co emissions per capita 1.14 (2024)
- Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity 1.14 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 in Namibia?
- Humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 in Namibia was 0 kt in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt in 1990.
- What is the lowest humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt in 1990.
- How does Namibia rank for humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Namibia ranks 79th out of 234 countries with data for 2024.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.