Statizoid

Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre (square) in Trinidad and Tobago

Trinidad and Tobago: Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre (square) was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 kt per square kilometre
World rank
60th
of 185 countries
All-time high
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2000
All-time low
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2002
Years of data
34
1990–2023

Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, 1990–2023

000001990200620231990: 0 kt per square kilometre1991: 0 kt per square kilometre1992: 0 kt per square kilometre1993: 0 kt per square kilometre1994: 0 kt per square kilometre1995: 0 kt per square kilometre1996: 0 kt per square kilometre1997: 0 kt per square kilometre1998: 0 kt per square kilometre1999: 0 kt per square kilometre2000: 0 kt per square kilometre2001: 0 kt per square kilometre2002: 0 kt per square kilometre2003: 0 kt per square kilometre2004: 0 kt per square kilometre2005: 0 kt per square kilometre2006: 0 kt per square kilometre2007: 0 kt per square kilometre2008: 0 kt per square kilometre2009: 0 kt per square kilometre2010: 0 kt per square kilometre2011: 0 kt per square kilometre2012: 0 kt per square kilometre2013: 0 kt per square kilometre2014: 0 kt per square kilometre2015: 0 kt per square kilometre2016: 0 kt per square kilometre2017: 0 kt per square kilometre2018: 0 kt per square kilometre2019: 0 kt per square kilometre2020: 0 kt per square kilometre2021: 0 kt per square kilometre2022: 0 kt per square kilometre2023: 0 kt per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago is 0 kt per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 0 kt per square kilometre in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2002.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 60th of 185 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre (square) in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year

Year kt per square kilometre Change
1990 0 kt per square kilometre —
1991 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1992 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1993 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1994 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1995 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1996 0 kt per square kilometre +230.2%
1997 0 kt per square kilometre -26.5%
1998 0 kt per square kilometre +113.0%
1999 0 kt per square kilometre -43.0%
2000 0 kt per square kilometre +80.0%
2001 0 kt per square kilometre -97.6%
2002 0 kt per square kilometre -100.0%
2003 0 kt per square kilometre —
2004 0 kt per square kilometre -100.0%
2005 0 kt per square kilometre —
2006 0 kt per square kilometre —
2007 0 kt per square kilometre +688.9%
2008 0 kt per square kilometre -100.0%
2009 0 kt per square kilometre —
2010 0 kt per square kilometre +1596.3%
2011 0 kt per square kilometre -100.0%
2012 0 kt per square kilometre —
2013 0 kt per square kilometre —
2014 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2015 0 kt per square kilometre +96.3%
2016 0 kt per square kilometre +1405.7%
2017 0 kt per square kilometre -50.0%
2018 0 kt per square kilometre -100.0%
2019 0 kt per square kilometre —
2020 0 kt per square kilometre -100.0%
2021 0 kt per square kilometre —
2022 0 kt per square kilometre —
2023 0 kt per square kilometre —

Trinidad and Tobago compared with similar countries

  • Trinidad and Tobago's 0 kt per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 kt per square kilometre. (37 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre (square) in Trinidad and Tobago changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2010 +1596.3% 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
2016 +1405.7% 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 10
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 10
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 10
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago

  1. 57 South Africa 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  2. 58 Sudan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  3. 59 China 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  4. 60 Aruba 0 kt per square kilometre
  5. 60 Afghanistan 0 kt per square kilometre
  6. 60 Albania 0 kt per square kilometre
  7. 60 Andorra 0 kt per square kilometre
  8. 60 United Arab Emirates 0 kt per square kilometre
  9. 60 Armenia 0 kt per square kilometre
  10. 60 American Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre
  11. 60 Antigua and Barbuda 0 kt per square kilometre
  12. 60 Austria 0 kt per square kilometre
  13. 60 Azerbaijan 0 kt per square kilometre
  14. 60 Burundi 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  15. 60 Belgium 0 kt per square kilometre
  16. 60 Burkina Faso 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  17. 60 Bulgaria 0 kt per square kilometre
  18. 60 Bahrain 0 kt per square kilometre
  19. 60 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 kt per square kilometre
  20. 60 Belarus 0 kt per square kilometre
  21. 60 Bermuda 0 kt per square kilometre
  22. 60 Barbados 0 kt per square kilometre
  23. 60 Botswana 0 kt per square kilometre
  24. 60 Canada 0 kt per square kilometre
  25. 60 Switzerland 0 kt per square kilometre
  26. 60 Chile 0 kt per square kilometre
  27. 60 Comoros 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  28. 60 Cayman Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  29. 60 Cyprus 0 kt per square kilometre
  30. 60 Czechia 0 kt per square kilometre
  31. 60 Germany 0 kt per square kilometre
  32. 60 Djibouti 0 kt per square kilometre
  33. 60 Dominica 0 kt per square kilometre
  34. 60 Denmark 0 kt per square kilometre
  35. 60 Algeria 0 kt per square kilometre
  36. 60 Egypt 0 kt per square kilometre
  37. 60 Eritrea 0 kt per square kilometre
  38. 60 Spain 0 kt per square kilometre
  39. 60 Estonia 0 kt per square kilometre
  40. 60 Finland 0 kt per square kilometre
  41. 60 France 0 kt per square kilometre
  42. 60 Faroe Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
  43. 60 Georgia 0 kt per square kilometre
  44. 60 Gibraltar 0 kt per square kilometre
  45. 60 Gambia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  46. 60 Greece 0 kt per square kilometre
  47. 60 Grenada 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  48. 60 Greenland 0 kt per square kilometre
  49. 60 Guam 0 kt per square kilometre
  50. 60 Croatia 0 kt per square kilometre
  51. 60 Haiti 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  52. 60 Hungary 0 kt per square kilometre
  53. 60 Isle of Man 0 kt per square kilometre
  54. 60 Ireland 0 kt per square kilometre
  55. 60 Iraq 0 kt per square kilometre
  56. 60 Iceland 0 kt per square kilometre
  57. 60 Israel 0 kt per square kilometre
  58. 60 Italy 0 kt per square kilometre
  59. 60 Jamaica 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  60. 60 Jordan 0 kt per square kilometre
  61. 60 Japan 0 kt per square kilometre
  62. 60 Kazakhstan 0 kt per square kilometre
  63. 60 Kenya 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  64. 60 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt per square kilometre
  65. 60 Kiribati 0 kt per square kilometre
  66. 60 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt per square kilometre
  67. 60 Kuwait 0 kt per square kilometre
  68. 60 Lebanon 0 kt per square kilometre
  69. 60 Libya 0 kt per square kilometre
  70. 60 Saint Lucia 0 kt per square kilometre
  71. 60 Sri Lanka 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  72. 60 Lesotho 0 kt per square kilometre
  73. 60 Lithuania 0 kt per square kilometre
  74. 60 Luxembourg 0 kt per square kilometre
  75. 60 Latvia 0 kt per square kilometre
  76. 60 Morocco 0 kt per square kilometre
  77. 60 Maldives 0 kt per square kilometre
  78. 60 Marshall Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
  79. 60 North Macedonia 0 kt per square kilometre
  80. 60 Mali 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  81. 60 Malta 0 kt per square kilometre
  82. 60 Montenegro 0 kt per square kilometre
  83. 60 Mongolia 0 kt per square kilometre
  84. 60 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
  85. 60 Mauritania 0 kt per square kilometre
  86. 60 Mauritius 0 kt per square kilometre
  87. 60 Namibia 0 kt per square kilometre
  88. 60 Niger 0 kt per square kilometre
  89. 60 Norway 0 kt per square kilometre
  90. 60 New Zealand 0 kt per square kilometre
  91. 60 Oman 0 kt per square kilometre
  92. 60 Pakistan 0 kt per square kilometre
  93. 60 Palau 0 kt per square kilometre
  94. 60 Poland 0 kt per square kilometre
  95. 60 Puerto Rico 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  96. 60 Portugal 0 kt per square kilometre
  97. 60 Palestine 0 kt per square kilometre
  98. 60 French Polynesia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  99. 60 Qatar 0 kt per square kilometre
  100. 60 Romania 0 kt per square kilometre
  101. 60 Rwanda 0 kt per square kilometre
  102. 60 Saudi Arabia 0 kt per square kilometre
  103. 60 Singapore 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  104. 60 Solomon Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  105. 60 Somalia 0 kt per square kilometre
  106. 60 Serbia 0 kt per square kilometre
  107. 60 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt per square kilometre
  108. 60 Slovakia 0 kt per square kilometre
  109. 60 Slovenia 0 kt per square kilometre
  110. 60 Sweden 0 kt per square kilometre
  111. 60 Eswatini 0 kt per square kilometre
  112. 60 Seychelles 0 kt per square kilometre
  113. 60 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  114. 60 Tajikistan 0 kt per square kilometre
  115. 60 Turkmenistan 0 kt per square kilometre
  116. 60 Tonga 0 kt per square kilometre
  117. 60 Tunisia 0 kt per square kilometre
  118. 60 Tuvalu 0 kt per square kilometre
  119. 60 Ukraine 0 kt per square kilometre
  120. 60 Uruguay 0 kt per square kilometre
  121. 60 Uzbekistan 0 kt per square kilometre
  122. 60 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt per square kilometre
  123. 60 British Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
  124. 60 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
  125. 60 Vanuatu 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  126. 60 Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  127. 60 Yemen 0 kt per square kilometre
  128. 60 Zimbabwe 0 kt per square kilometre

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More climate change data for Trinidad and Tobago

All data for Trinidad and Tobago →

Frequently asked questions

What is humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago?
Humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
The highest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2000.
What is the lowest humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2002.
How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 60th out of 185 countries with data for 2023.
Is humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/humid-tropical-forest-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/humid-tropical-forest-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/trinidad-and-tobago/">Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,179 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.