IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP in Lithuania
Lithuania: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP in Lithuania, 1995–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp in Lithuania stood at 0 kt per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 29 years on record.
That represents a change of down 13.7% on the previous year and down 49.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp in Lithuania peaked at 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
That places Lithuania 102nd out of 198 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | kt per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -23.0% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -20.2% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +27.6% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +1.7% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +18.4% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 2019 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 2022 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2023 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 0 kt per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 kt per US$ of GDP, 5.5× the median. (76 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 0 kt per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 kt per US$ of GDP, 2.3× the median. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
- 99 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 100 El Salvador 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 101 Costa Rica 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 103 North Macedonia 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 104 Egypt 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 105 Mexico 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
More climate change data for Lithuania
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 120.73 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,997 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 590.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,407 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.23 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 85.96 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 854.17 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 843.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.18 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp in Lithuania?
- Ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp in Lithuania was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Lithuania rank for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp?
- Lithuania ranks 102nd out of 198 countries with data for 2023.
- Is ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 49.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.