Land-use change — Emissions per capita in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Land-use change — Emissions per capita was 0 t CO2eq/cap in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Land-use change — Emissions per capita in Kazakhstan, 1992–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t CO2eq/cap.
Analysis
In 2023, land-use change — emissions per capita in Kazakhstan stood at 0 t CO2eq/cap. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, land-use change — emissions per capita in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.1 t CO2eq/cap in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 t CO2eq/cap, in 2016.
Kazakhstan ranks 94th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.02 t CO2eq/cap | 0.02 t CO2eq/cap | 0.02 t CO2eq/cap | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.084 t CO2eq/cap | 0.02 t CO2eq/cap | 0.1 t CO2eq/cap | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.034 t CO2eq/cap | 0 t CO2eq/cap | 0.09 t CO2eq/cap | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t CO2eq/cap | 0 t CO2eq/cap | 0 t CO2eq/cap | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 94 Afghanistan 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Albania 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Algeria 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Armenia 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Aruba 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Azerbaijan 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Bahrain 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Barbados 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Belarus 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Belgium 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Botswana 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 British Virgin Islands 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Burundi 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 China (People’s Republic of) 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 China, Macao SAR 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 China, mainland 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 China, Taiwan Province of 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Comoros 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Czechia 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Denmark 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Djibouti 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Dominican Republic 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Egypt 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 El Salvador 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Fiji 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Finland 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 France 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Georgia 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Germany 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Ghana 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Greece 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Grenada 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Haiti 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Hungary 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Iceland 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 India 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Ireland 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Jamaica 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Jordan 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Kenya 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Kiribati 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Kuwait 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Kyrgyzstan 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Latvia 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Lebanon 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Lesotho 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Libya 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Lithuania 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Luxembourg 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Maldives 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Malta 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Marshall Islands 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Mauritius 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Mongolia 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Montenegro 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Nauru 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Netherlands Antilles (former) 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 New Zealand 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Oman 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Pakistan 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Palau 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Philippines 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Poland 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Portugal 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Qatar 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Russian Federation 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Rwanda 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Saint Lucia 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Sao Tome and Principe 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Saudi Arabia 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Serbia 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Serbia and Montenegro 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Singapore 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Slovak Republic 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 South Africa 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Spain 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Switzerland 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Tajikistan 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Tonga 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Turkmenistan 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Tuvalu 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Ukraine 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 United Arab Emirates 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Uruguay 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Uzbekistan 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
- 94 Yemen 0 t CO2eq/cap compare
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 28.52 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is land-use change — emissions per capita in Kazakhstan?
- Land-use change — emissions per capita in Kazakhstan was 0 t CO2eq/cap in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest land-use change — emissions per capita recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1 t CO2eq/cap in 2001.
- What is the lowest land-use change — emissions per capita recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t CO2eq/cap in 2016.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for land-use change — emissions per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 94th out of 187 countries with data for 2023.
- Is land-use change — emissions per capita rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Land-use change — Emissions per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.