Land-use change — Emissions Share (CO2eq) in El Salvador
El Salvador: Land-use change — Emissions Share (CO2eq) was 0 % in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Land-use change — Emissions Share (CO2eq) in El Salvador, 1990–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for land-use change — emissions share (co2eq) in El Salvador is 0 %, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, land-use change — emissions share (co2eq) in El Salvador peaked at 9.42 % in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2011.
El Salvador ranks 98th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.52 % | 6.51 % | 9.42 % | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.12 % | 5.69 % | 6.8 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.672 % | 0 % | 6.17 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0125 % | 0 % | 0.03 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
- 95 Libya 0.03 % compare
- 96 India 0.02 % compare
- 97 Philippines 0.01 % compare
- 98 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Albania 0 % compare
- 98 Armenia, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Aruba, Kingdom of the Netherlands 0 % compare
- 98 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 % compare
- 98 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 % compare
- 98 Barbados 0 % compare
- 98 Belarus, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Belgium 0 % compare
- 98 Botswana 0 % compare
- 98 British Virgin Islands 0 % compare
- 98 Burundi 0 % compare
- 98 China, People's Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 % compare
- 98 China, Macao SAR 0 % compare
- 98 China, mainland 0 % compare
- 98 China, Taiwan Province of 0 % compare
- 98 Comoros, Union of the 0 % compare
- 98 Czech Republic 0 % compare
- 98 Denmark 0 % compare
- 98 Djibouti 0 % compare
- 98 Dominican Republic 0 % compare
- 98 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Finland 0 % compare
- 98 France 0 % compare
- 98 Georgia 0 % compare
- 98 Germany 0 % compare
- 98 Greece 0 % compare
- 98 Grenada 0 % compare
- 98 Haiti 0 % compare
- 98 Hungary 0 % compare
- 98 Iceland 0 % compare
- 98 Ireland 0 % compare
- 98 Jamaica 0 % compare
- 98 Jordan 0 % compare
- 98 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Kenya 0 % compare
- 98 Kiribati 0 % compare
- 98 Kuwait 0 % compare
- 98 Kyrgyz Republic 0 % compare
- 98 Latvia, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Lebanon 0 % compare
- 98 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 % compare
- 98 Lithuania, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Luxembourg 0 % compare
- 98 Maldives 0 % compare
- 98 Malta 0 % compare
- 98 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 0 % compare
- 98 Mauritius 0 % compare
- 98 Mongolia 0 % compare
- 98 Montenegro 0 % compare
- 98 Nauru, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 % compare
- 98 Netherlands Antilles (former) 0 % compare
- 98 New Zealand 0 % compare
- 98 Oman 0 % compare
- 98 Pakistan 0 % compare
- 98 Palau, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Poland, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Portugal 0 % compare
- 98 Qatar 0 % compare
- 98 Russian Federation 0 % compare
- 98 Rwanda 0 % compare
- 98 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 % compare
- 98 St. Lucia 0 % compare
- 98 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 % compare
- 98 São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Saudi Arabia 0 % compare
- 98 Serbia, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Serbia and Montenegro 0 % compare
- 98 Singapore 0 % compare
- 98 Slovak Republic 0 % compare
- 98 South Africa 0 % compare
- 98 Spain 0 % compare
- 98 Switzerland 0 % compare
- 98 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Tonga 0 % compare
- 98 Turkmenistan 0 % compare
- 98 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 % compare
- 98 Tuvalu 0 % compare
- 98 Ukraine 0 % compare
- 98 United Arab Emirates 0 % compare
- 98 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 % compare
- 98 Uruguay 0 % compare
- 98 Uzbekistan, Republic of 0 % compare
- 98 Yemen, Republic of 0 % compare
More climate change data for El Salvador
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,408 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,253 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 4,155 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 148.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,045 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 999.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 45.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.61 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is land-use change — emissions share (co2eq) in El Salvador?
- Land-use change — emissions share (co2eq) in El Salvador was 0 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest land-use change — emissions share (co2eq) recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 9.42 % in 1990.
- What is the lowest land-use change — emissions share (co2eq) recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2011.
- How does El Salvador rank for land-use change — emissions share (co2eq)?
- El Salvador ranks 98th out of 187 countries with data for 2023.
- Is land-use change — emissions share (co2eq) rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Land-use change — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.