LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0 kt per square kilometre
Change on year
down 80.0%
World rank
103rd
of 199 countries
All-time high
0 kt per square kilometre
in 1997
All-time low
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2017
Years of data
32
1992–2023
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for lulucf — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan is 0 kt per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 80.0% on the previous year and up 861.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, lulucf — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan peaked at 0 kt per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2017.
Kazakhstan ranks 103rd of 199 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | kt per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +331.5% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +141.9% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -50.7% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -35.1% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -98.5% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +489.1% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -73.2% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -73.3% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -62.5% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +2032.0% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -88.3% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -86.7% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +333.3% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -81.3% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -64.3% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +2796.0% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -75.8% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2019 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 2022 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +297.3% |
| 2023 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -80.0% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0 kt per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 kt per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | +2796.0% | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre |
| 2007 | +2032.0% | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 100 Namibia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 101 Belarus 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 102 Sudan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 104 Romania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 105 Mongolia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Aruba 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Afghanistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Andorra 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 United Arab Emirates 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 American Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Antigua and Barbuda 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Austria 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Azerbaijan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Belgium 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Burkina Faso 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Bahrain 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Bermuda 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Barbados 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Botswana 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Switzerland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Comoros 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Cayman Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Cyprus 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Czechia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Germany 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Djibouti 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Dominica 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Denmark 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Egypt 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Eritrea 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Estonia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Finland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Faroe Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Gibraltar 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Gambia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Grenada 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Greenland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Guam 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Isle of Man 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Ireland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Iraq 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Iceland 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Israel 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Jamaica 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Jordan 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Kyrgyzstan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Kiribati 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Kuwait 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Lebanon 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Libya 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Saint Lucia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Liechtenstein 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Lesotho 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Lithuania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Luxembourg 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Maldives 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Marshall Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Mali 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Malta 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Montenegro 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Northern Mariana Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Mauritania 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Mauritius 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Niger 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Norway 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Nauru 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Oman 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Pakistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Palau 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Poland 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Puerto Rico 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Palestine 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 French Polynesia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Qatar 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Saudi Arabia 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Singapore 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Solomon Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Somalia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Serbia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Sao Tome and Principe 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Slovakia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Slovenia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Sweden 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Seychelles 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Tajikistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Turkmenistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Tonga 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Trinidad and Tobago 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Tuvalu 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Uzbekistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 British Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 United States Virgin Islands 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Vanuatu 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Samoa 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 106 Yemen 0 kt per square kilometre
- 106 Channel Islands 0 kt per square kilometre
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is lulucf — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan?
- Lulucf — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre in Kazakhstan was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest lulucf — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest lulucf — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for lulucf — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
- Kazakhstan ranks 103rd out of 199 countries with data for 2023.
- Is lulucf — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 861.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of LULUCF — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- LULUCF — Emissions Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
LULUCF — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.