Methane emissions in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Methane emissions was 54.97 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
54.97 million
Change on year
up 1.4%
World rank
31st
of 199 countries
All-time high
72.01 million
in 1990
All-time low
2.21 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Methane emissions in Kazakhstan, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, methane emissions in Kazakhstan stood at 54.97 million.
The figure is up 1.4% on the previous year and up 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, methane emissions in Kazakhstan peaked at 72.01 million in 1990 and was at its lowest, 2.21 million, in 1850.
That places Kazakhstan 31st out of 199 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Methane emissions in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 2.21 million | — |
| 1851 | 2.22 million | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 2.22 million | +0.1% |
| 1853 | 2.22 million | +0.1% |
| 1854 | 2.22 million | +0.1% |
| 1855 | 2.23 million | +0.4% |
| 1856 | 2.23 million | -0.1% |
| 1857 | 2.23 million | +0.1% |
| 1858 | 2.24 million | +0.5% |
| 1859 | 2.25 million | +0.2% |
| 1860 | 2.25 million | +0.2% |
| 1861 | 2.27 million | +0.9% |
| 1862 | 2.29 million | +0.7% |
| 1863 | 2.31 million | +0.8% |
| 1864 | 2.33 million | +0.8% |
| 1865 | 2.34 million | +0.7% |
| 1866 | 2.39 million | +1.9% |
| 1867 | 2.41 million | +1.0% |
| 1868 | 2.42 million | +0.4% |
| 1869 | 2.45 million | +1.3% |
| 1870 | 2.47 million | +0.9% |
| 1871 | 2.56 million | +3.6% |
| 1872 | 2.64 million | +2.8% |
| 1873 | 2.70 million | +2.5% |
| 1874 | 2.79 million | +3.2% |
| 1875 | 2.87 million | +3.0% |
| 1876 | 2.96 million | +3.3% |
| 1877 | 3.03 million | +2.4% |
| 1878 | 3.15 million | +3.7% |
| 1879 | 3.22 million | +2.3% |
| 1880 | 3.32 million | +3.2% |
| 1881 | 3.39 million | +1.9% |
| 1882 | 3.45 million | +2.0% |
| 1883 | 3.54 million | +2.6% |
| 1884 | 3.59 million | +1.4% |
| 1885 | 3.67 million | +2.1% |
| 1886 | 3.73 million | +1.7% |
| 1887 | 3.80 million | +1.7% |
| 1888 | 3.86 million | +1.8% |
| 1889 | 3.95 million | +2.2% |
| 1890 | 4.05 million | +2.4% |
| 1891 | 4.21 million | +4.1% |
| 1892 | 4.38 million | +3.9% |
| 1893 | 4.59 million | +4.9% |
| 1894 | 4.76 million | +3.6% |
| 1895 | 4.96 million | +4.2% |
| 1896 | 5.11 million | +3.2% |
| 1897 | 5.36 million | +4.8% |
| 1898 | 5.60 million | +4.4% |
| 1899 | 5.90 million | +5.5% |
| 1900 | 6.18 million | +4.7% |
| 1901 | 6.32 million | +2.3% |
| 1902 | 6.42 million | +1.6% |
| 1903 | 6.55 million | +2.1% |
| 1904 | 6.84 million | +4.4% |
| 1905 | 6.88 million | +0.5% |
| 1906 | 7.19 million | +4.5% |
| 1907 | 7.51 million | +4.5% |
| 1908 | 7.66 million | +2.0% |
| 1909 | 7.88 million | +2.9% |
| 1910 | 7.97 million | +1.1% |
| 1911 | 8.35 million | +4.8% |
| 1912 | 8.92 million | +6.9% |
| 1913 | 9.46 million | +6.0% |
| 1914 | 9.47 million | +0.2% |
| 1915 | 9.52 million | +0.5% |
| 1916 | 9.96 million | +4.6% |
| 1917 | 10.08 million | +1.2% |
| 1918 | 8.98 million | -10.9% |
| 1919 | 9.04 million | +0.7% |
| 1920 | 9.23 million | +2.0% |
| 1921 | 9.41 million | +2.0% |
| 1922 | 9.69 million | +3.0% |
| 1923 | 9.90 million | +2.1% |
| 1924 | 10.24 million | +3.5% |
| 1925 | 10.31 million | +0.7% |
| 1926 | 11.06 million | +7.3% |
| 1927 | 11.66 million | +5.4% |
| 1928 | 12.06 million | +3.5% |
| 1929 | 12.32 million | +2.2% |
| 1930 | 13.25 million | +7.5% |
| 1931 | 14.40 million | +8.7% |
| 1932 | 15.59 million | +8.3% |
| 1933 | 16.78 million | +7.6% |
| 1934 | 18.60 million | +10.8% |
| 1935 | 20.15 million | +8.4% |
| 1936 | 22.11 million | +9.7% |
| 1937 | 22.91 million | +3.6% |
| 1938 | 24.11 million | +5.2% |
| 1939 | 24.88 million | +3.2% |
| 1940 | 28.12 million | +13.0% |
| 1941 | 26.04 million | -7.4% |
| 1942 | 21.64 million | -16.9% |
| 1943 | 24.31 million | +12.4% |
| 1944 | 22.86 million | -6.0% |
| 1945 | 23.88 million | +4.5% |
| 1946 | 24.72 million | +3.5% |
| 1947 | 26.53 million | +7.3% |
| 1948 | 26.77 million | +0.9% |
| 1949 | 28.03 million | +4.7% |
| 1950 | 29.05 million | +3.6% |
| 1951 | 30.52 million | +5.1% |
| 1952 | 32.08 million | +5.1% |
| 1953 | 33.70 million | +5.1% |
| 1954 | 36.28 million | +7.6% |
| 1955 | 39.96 million | +10.1% |
| 1956 | 43.00 million | +7.6% |
| 1957 | 46.12 million | +7.3% |
| 1958 | 48.46 million | +5.1% |
| 1959 | 50.47 million | +4.2% |
| 1960 | 51.95 million | +2.9% |
| 1961 | 50.25 million | -3.3% |
| 1962 | 51.58 million | +2.6% |
| 1963 | 53.64 million | +4.0% |
| 1964 | 53.95 million | +0.6% |
| 1965 | 54.89 million | +1.7% |
| 1966 | 56.56 million | +3.1% |
| 1967 | 56.95 million | +0.7% |
| 1968 | 55.91 million | -1.8% |
| 1969 | 55.23 million | -1.2% |
| 1970 | 61.09 million | +10.6% |
| 1971 | 61.36 million | +0.4% |
| 1972 | 62.26 million | +1.5% |
| 1973 | 63.36 million | +1.8% |
| 1974 | 63.77 million | +0.6% |
| 1975 | 65.08 million | +2.1% |
| 1976 | 66.46 million | +2.1% |
| 1977 | 66.19 million | -0.4% |
| 1978 | 66.40 million | +0.3% |
| 1979 | 66.47 million | +0.1% |
| 1980 | 65.25 million | -1.8% |
| 1981 | 63.65 million | -2.5% |
| 1982 | 63.44 million | -0.3% |
| 1983 | 62.65 million | -1.3% |
| 1984 | 66.61 million | +6.3% |
| 1985 | 61.94 million | -7.0% |
| 1986 | 62.36 million | +0.7% |
| 1987 | 62.54 million | +0.3% |
| 1988 | 62.22 million | -0.5% |
| 1989 | 63.64 million | +2.3% |
| 1990 | 72.01 million | +13.1% |
| 1991 | 68.58 million | -4.8% |
| 1992 | 66.87 million | -2.5% |
| 1993 | 62.48 million | -6.6% |
| 1994 | 52.84 million | -15.4% |
| 1995 | 43.90 million | -16.9% |
| 1996 | 39.63 million | -9.7% |
| 1997 | 36.13 million | -8.9% |
| 1998 | 32.90 million | -8.9% |
| 1999 | 29.29 million | -11.0% |
| 2000 | 32.82 million | +12.0% |
| 2001 | 34.13 million | +4.0% |
| 2002 | 38.50 million | +12.8% |
| 2003 | 38.11 million | -1.0% |
| 2004 | 40.65 million | +6.6% |
| 2005 | 41.69 million | +2.6% |
| 2006 | 44.86 million | +7.6% |
| 2007 | 44.68 million | -0.4% |
| 2008 | 48.84 million | +9.3% |
| 2009 | 47.86 million | -2.0% |
| 2010 | 52.07 million | +8.8% |
| 2011 | 50.89 million | -2.3% |
| 2012 | 51.33 million | +0.9% |
| 2013 | 50.23 million | -2.1% |
| 2014 | 51.59 million | +2.7% |
| 2015 | 46.42 million | -10.0% |
| 2016 | 46.55 million | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 53.11 million | +14.1% |
| 2018 | 52.26 million | -1.6% |
| 2019 | 53.14 million | +1.7% |
| 2020 | 52.08 million | -2.0% |
| 2021 | 54.11 million | +3.9% |
| 2022 | 54.52 million | +0.8% |
| 2023 | 54.19 million | -0.6% |
| 2024 | 54.97 million | +1.4% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 54.97 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 11.73 million, 4.7× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 54.97 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 8.68 million, 6.3× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 2.23 million | 2.21 million | 2.25 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 2.35 million | 2.25 million | 2.45 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 2.84 million | 2.47 million | 3.22 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 3.63 million | 3.32 million | 3.95 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 4.89 million | 4.05 million | 5.90 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 6.94 million | 6.18 million | 7.88 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 9.18 million | 7.97 million | 10.08 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 10.59 million | 9.23 million | 12.32 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 19.28 million | 13.25 million | 24.88 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 25.29 million | 21.64 million | 28.12 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 38.96 million | 29.05 million | 50.47 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 54.09 million | 50.25 million | 56.95 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 64.24 million | 61.09 million | 66.47 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 63.43 million | 61.94 million | 66.61 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 50.46 million | 29.29 million | 72.01 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 41.21 million | 32.82 million | 48.84 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 50.76 million | 46.42 million | 53.14 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 53.98 million | 52.08 million | 54.97 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is methane emissions in Kazakhstan?
- Methane emissions in Kazakhstan was 54.97 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest methane emissions recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 72.01 million in 1990.
- What is the lowest methane emissions recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.21 million in 1850.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for methane emissions?
- Kazakhstan ranks 31st out of 199 countries with data for 2024.
- Is methane emissions rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Methane emissions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).