Other forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Congo
Congo: Other forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0 ha per square kilometre
Change on year
down 100.0%
World rank
79th
of 186 countries
All-time high
0.0026 ha per square kilometre
in 2006
All-time low
0 ha per square kilometre
in 2001
Years of data
34
1990–2023
Other forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Congo, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Congo recorded 0 ha per square kilometre for other forest — burned area, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% on the previous year and down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other forest — burned area, per square kilometre in Congo peaked at 0.0026 ha per square kilometre in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per square kilometre, in 2001.
Congo ranks 79th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Congo, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1997 | 0.0003 ha per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0003 ha per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | -32.5% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2003 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2004 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2005 | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0026 ha per square kilometre | +1266.7% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0018 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2009 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2010 | 0.0003 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2011 | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0009 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2014 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0012 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2016 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0003 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2018 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0008 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2020 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +53.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 ha per square kilometre | -90.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0007 ha per square kilometre | +450.0% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Congo changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | +1266.7% | 0.0002 ha per square kilometre | 0.0026 ha per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | 0.0003 ha per square kilometre | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0005 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0026 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0012 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0005 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 76 Nigeria 0.0001 ha per square kilometre compare
- 77 Romania 0.0001 ha per square kilometre compare
- 78 Mongolia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Aruba 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Afghanistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Andorra 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 United Arab Emirates 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 American Samoa 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Antigua and Barbuda 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Austria 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Azerbaijan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Belgium 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Benin 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Burkina Faso 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Bangladesh 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Bahrain 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Belize 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Bermuda 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Barbados 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Botswana 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Switzerland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Comoros 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Cayman Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Cyprus 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Czechia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Germany 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Djibouti 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Dominica 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Denmark 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Egypt 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Eritrea 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Estonia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Finland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Fiji 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Faroe Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Gabon 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Ghana 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Gibraltar 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Guinea 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Gambia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Guinea-Bissau 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Equatorial Guinea 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Grenada 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Greenland 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Guam 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Isle of Man 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Ireland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Iraq 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Iceland 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Israel 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Jamaica 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Jordan 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Kyrgyzstan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Kiribati 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Kuwait 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Lebanon 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Liberia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Libya 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Saint Lucia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Liechtenstein 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Lesotho 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Lithuania 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Luxembourg 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Maldives 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Marshall Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Mali 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Malta 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Montenegro 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Northern Mariana Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Mauritania 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Mauritius 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 New Caledonia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Niger 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Norway 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Oman 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Pakistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Panama 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Palau 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Poland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Puerto Rico 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Palestine 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 French Polynesia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Qatar 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Saudi Arabia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Senegal 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Singapore 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Solomon Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Somalia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Serbia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Sao Tome and Principe 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Suriname 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Slovakia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Slovenia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Sweden 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Seychelles 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Togo 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Tajikistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Turkmenistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Tonga 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Trinidad and Tobago 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Tuvalu 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Uzbekistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 British Virgin Islands 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 United States Virgin Islands 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 79 Vanuatu 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Samoa 0 ha per square kilometre
- 79 Yemen 0 ha per square kilometre
More climate change data for Congo
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 226,333 kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 762.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 278.7 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 484.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.05 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.29 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 13.23 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 6.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.025 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other forest — burned area, per square kilometre in Congo?
- Other forest — burned area, per square kilometre in Congo was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other forest — burned area, per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0026 ha per square kilometre in 2006.
- What is the lowest other forest — burned area, per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2001.
- How does Congo rank for other forest — burned area, per square kilometre?
- Congo ranks 79th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is other forest — burned area, per square kilometre rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other forest — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other forest — Burned Area ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Other forest — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.