Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Mexico
Mexico: Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Mexico, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp in Mexico is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 61.8% on the previous year and up 1,426.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp in Mexico peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
Mexico ranks 17th of 183 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Mexico, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -31.5% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +45.6% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -82.5% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +23.0% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +526.8% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -32.1% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -70.4% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +45.0% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +62.9% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -72.3% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +280.5% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -51.4% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.9% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +23.2% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -42.8% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +104.6% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -32.6% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +77.2% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -93.9% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +294.7% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +154.1% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +76.3% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -52.0% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +131.0% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -26.7% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -25.3% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +61.8% |
Mexico compared with similar countries
- Mexico's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 163.0× the median. (52 countries reporting)
- Mexico's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 801.2× the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Mexico changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | +526.8% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
More climate change data for Mexico
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 1.98 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 107,348 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 27,904 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 79,444 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 105.3 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2,837 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 14,399 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 13,607 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 791.54 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 51.35 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp in Mexico?
- Other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp in Mexico was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1990.
- What is the lowest other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Mexico rank for other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Mexico ranks 17th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
- Is other forest — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,426.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Other forest — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Other forest — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Other forest — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Other forest — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Other forest — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.