Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP in Belarus
Belarus: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp in Belarus stood at 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The figure is up 1.5% on the previous year and down 1.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp in Belarus peaked at 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
That places Belarus 25th out of 166 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP in Belarus, year by year
| Year | kt per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 1994 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +8.0% |
| 1995 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +4.8% |
| 1996 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +1.7% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -9.5% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +21.7% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -18.6% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -19.7% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -25.6% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -20.7% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -21.5% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -27.8% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +18.9% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -11.6% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -6.0% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +37.6% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +17.5% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 2019 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +4.1% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2022 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2023 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0 kt per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 kt per US$ of GDP, 9.8× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0 kt per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 kt per US$ of GDP, 10.6× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 22 Guinea 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 23 Turkmenistan 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 24 Mauritania 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 26 New Zealand 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 27 Myanmar 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 28 Benin 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
More climate change data for Belarus
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 644.33 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,124 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,377 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9,748 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 8.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 348.13 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,092 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,078 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 15.39 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp in Belarus?
- Raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp in Belarus was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 1999.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Belarus rank for raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp?
- Belarus ranks 25th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is raw milk of cattle — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.