Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate in Ecuador
Ecuador: Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate was -1.78 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate in Ecuador, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate in Ecuador is -1.78 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 491.8% on the previous year and up 40.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate in Ecuador peaked at 46.21 % change on previous year in 2001 and was at its lowest, -21.11 % change on previous year, in 2000.
That places Ecuador 145th out of 201 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | -4 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | -1.96 % change on previous year | -51.1% |
| 1964 | -1.37 % change on previous year | -30.0% |
| 1965 | -1.29 % change on previous year | -6.1% |
| 1966 | -3.97 % change on previous year | +208.8% |
| 1967 | 1.17 % change on previous year | -129.5% |
| 1968 | 3.67 % change on previous year | +212.9% |
| 1969 | -1.15 % change on previous year | -131.5% |
| 1970 | -1.12 % change on previous year | -2.9% |
| 1971 | -1.29 % change on previous year | +14.8% |
| 1972 | 2.29 % change on previous year | -278.1% |
| 1973 | -1.97 % change on previous year | -186.1% |
| 1974 | 2.08 % change on previous year | -205.3% |
| 1975 | -0.9497 % change on previous year | -145.7% |
| 1976 | -1.58 % change on previous year | +65.9% |
| 1977 | -4.55 % change on previous year | +188.8% |
| 1978 | -1.96 % change on previous year | -56.9% |
| 1979 | -1.08 % change on previous year | -45.2% |
| 1980 | -1.71 % change on previous year | +59.2% |
| 1981 | 6.34 % change on previous year | -470.5% |
| 1982 | -16.05 % change on previous year | -353.1% |
| 1983 | 9.42 % change on previous year | -158.7% |
| 1984 | -0.8071 % change on previous year | -108.6% |
| 1985 | -4.48 % change on previous year | +454.5% |
| 1986 | 4.4 % change on previous year | -198.3% |
| 1987 | 6.66 % change on previous year | +51.4% |
| 1988 | -6.4 % change on previous year | -196.2% |
| 1989 | 1.07 % change on previous year | -116.8% |
| 1990 | 2.67 % change on previous year | +148.5% |
| 1991 | -3.67 % change on previous year | -237.5% |
| 1992 | -2.03 % change on previous year | -44.6% |
| 1993 | -0.1308 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 1994 | -5.18 % change on previous year | +3862.3% |
| 1995 | -4.66 % change on previous year | -10.1% |
| 1996 | 0.4001 % change on previous year | -108.6% |
| 1997 | -12.67 % change on previous year | -3266.6% |
| 1998 | 13.26 % change on previous year | -204.7% |
| 1999 | -0.514 % change on previous year | -103.9% |
| 2000 | -21.11 % change on previous year | +4007.6% |
| 2001 | 46.21 % change on previous year | -318.9% |
| 2002 | -11.83 % change on previous year | -125.6% |
| 2003 | 2.29 % change on previous year | -119.3% |
| 2004 | -4.83 % change on previous year | -311.4% |
| 2005 | -3.32 % change on previous year | -31.3% |
| 2006 | -6.41 % change on previous year | +92.8% |
| 2007 | 2.86 % change on previous year | -144.7% |
| 2008 | -5.42 % change on previous year | -289.4% |
| 2009 | 4.89 % change on previous year | -190.2% |
| 2010 | -2.34 % change on previous year | -147.8% |
| 2011 | -7.28 % change on previous year | +211.5% |
| 2012 | 4.96 % change on previous year | -168.1% |
| 2013 | -2.98 % change on previous year | -160.1% |
| 2014 | -0.8863 % change on previous year | -70.3% |
| 2015 | -3.18 % change on previous year | +259.3% |
| 2016 | -2.5 % change on previous year | -21.4% |
| 2017 | -1.04 % change on previous year | -58.6% |
| 2018 | -0.5726 % change on previous year | -44.7% |
| 2019 | -9.58 % change on previous year | +1573.6% |
| 2020 | 4.38 % change on previous year | -145.7% |
| 2021 | -5.04 % change on previous year | -215.2% |
| 2022 | -0.3012 % change on previous year | -94.0% |
| 2023 | -1.78 % change on previous year | +491.8% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | -4007.6% | -0.514 % change on previous year | -21.11 % change on previous year |
| 1994 | -3862.3% | -0.1308 % change on previous year | -5.18 % change on previous year |
| 1997 | -3266.6% | 0.4001 % change on previous year | -12.67 % change on previous year |
| 2019 | -1573.6% | -0.5726 % change on previous year | -9.58 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -1.11 % change on previous year | -4 % change on previous year | 3.67 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | -1.01 % change on previous year | -4.55 % change on previous year | 2.29 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.1561 % change on previous year | -16.05 % change on previous year | 9.42 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.25 % change on previous year | -12.67 % change on previous year | 13.26 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3323 % change on previous year | -21.11 % change on previous year | 46.21 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -2.54 % change on previous year | -9.58 % change on previous year | 4.96 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.6872 % change on previous year | -5.04 % change on previous year | 4.38 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 142 Armenia -1.67 % change on previous year compare
- 143 Romania -1.68 % change on previous year compare
- 144 Trinidad and Tobago -1.73 % change on previous year compare
- 146 United Republic of Tanzania -1.83 % change on previous year compare
- 147 Canada -1.92 % change on previous year compare
- 148 Morocco -1.93 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Ecuador
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 218.44 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,195 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,758 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14,437 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.95 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 515.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,911 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,488 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,423 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.62 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate in Ecuador?
- Raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate in Ecuador was -1.78 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 46.21 % change on previous year in 2001.
- What is the lowest raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -21.11 % change on previous year in 2000.
- How does Ecuador rank for raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate?
- Ecuador ranks 145th out of 201 countries with data for 2023.
- Is raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, annual growth rate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.