Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) in Norway
Norway: Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre in Norway, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per square kilometre.
Analysis
Norway recorded 0 ha per square kilometre for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Norway peaked at 0.0109 ha per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per square kilometre, in 2001.
Norway ranks 109th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) in Norway, year by year
| Year | ha per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0013 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -99.3% |
| 1997 | 0.0032 ha per square kilometre | +34079.6% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -99.7% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2003 | 0.0083 ha per square kilometre | +6896.8% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0041 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2007 | 0.0073 ha per square kilometre | +79.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0109 ha per square kilometre | +49.2% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2011 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2012 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2013 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2014 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2015 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2016 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2017 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2018 | 0.0004 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2019 | 0.0029 ha per square kilometre | +715.9% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2022 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
| 2023 | 0 ha per square kilometre | — |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre (Area) in Norway changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | +34079.6% | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0032 ha per square kilometre |
| 2003 | +6896.8% | 0.0001 ha per square kilometre | 0.0083 ha per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0011 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0032 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0031 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0109 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0003 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0.0029 ha per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 0 ha per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Norway
- 106 Afghanistan 0.0001 ha per square kilometre compare
- 107 Germany 0.0001 ha per square kilometre compare
- 108 Somalia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Aruba 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Andorra 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 United Arab Emirates 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Armenia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 American Samoa 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Antigua and Barbuda 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Austria 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Belgium 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Burkina Faso 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Bahrain 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Bermuda 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Switzerland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Comoros 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Cayman Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Czechia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Djibouti 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Dominica 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Denmark 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Eritrea 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Finland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Faroe Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Gibraltar 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Grenada 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Greenland 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Guam 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Hungary 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Isle of Man 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Ireland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Iraq 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Iceland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Israel 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Jordan 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Kyrgyzstan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Kiribati 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Kuwait 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Lebanon 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Libya 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Saint Lucia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Liechtenstein 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Lesotho 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Luxembourg 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Latvia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Monaco 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Maldives 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Marshall Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Malta 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Montenegro 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Northern Mariana Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Mauritania 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Mauritius 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Niger 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Oman 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Palau 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Poland 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Puerto Rico 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Palestine 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 French Polynesia 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Qatar 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Saudi Arabia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Singapore 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Solomon Islands 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 San Marino 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Slovakia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Slovenia 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Sweden 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Seychelles 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Tajikistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Turkmenistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Tonga 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Tuvalu 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Uzbekistan 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 British Virgin Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 United States Virgin Islands 0 ha per square kilometre
- 109 Vanuatu 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Samoa 0 ha per square kilometre compare
- 109 Yemen 0 ha per square kilometre
More climate change data for Norway
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 147.21 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,074 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 927.05 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,147 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.5 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 112.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 904.43 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 902.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.4 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Norway?
- Savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre in Norway was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0109 ha per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per square kilometre in 2001.
- How does Norway rank for savanna and woody savanna — burned area, per square kilometre?
- Norway ranks 109th out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Savanna and woody savanna — Burned Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.