Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Eswatini
Eswatini: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Eswatini, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Eswatini is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 125.8% on the previous year and up 51.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Eswatini peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2006.
That places Eswatini 22nd out of 185 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.0% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +98.9% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -39.4% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +115.9% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -32.6% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -52.0% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -72.4% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +21.6% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -27.4% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -49.0% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +476.7% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -41.2% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +77.1% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +9.8% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +5.4% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -59.7% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -41.4% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +87.6% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +163.9% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -59.1% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +59.3% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -29.1% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +19.6% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +125.8% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 55.4× the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 1.5× the median. (43 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | +476.7% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More climate change data for Eswatini
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 10.39 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,459 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 469.92 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 988.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 35.32 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 77.58 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 66.81 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.2521 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Eswatini?
- Savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Eswatini was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1998.
- What is the lowest savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2006.
- How does Eswatini rank for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Eswatini ranks 22nd out of 185 countries with data for 2024.
- Is savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 51.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Savanna — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Savanna — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.