Statizoid

Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Poland

Poland: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0 ha per US$ of GDP
World rank
109th
of 185 countries
All-time high
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2003
All-time low
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2000
Years of data
35
1990–2024

Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Poland, 1990–2024

000001990200720241990: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1991: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1992: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1993: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1994: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1995: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1996: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1997: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1998: 0 ha per US$ of GDP1999: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2000: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2001: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2002: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2003: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2004: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2005: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2006: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2007: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2008: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2009: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2010: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2011: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2012: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2013: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2014: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2015: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2016: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2017: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2018: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2019: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2020: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2021: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2022: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2023: 0 ha per US$ of GDP2024: 0 ha per US$ of GDP

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

The most recent figure for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Poland is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.

The figure is down 86.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Poland peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2000.

Poland ranks 109th of 185 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Poland, year by year

Year ha per US$ of GDP Change
1990 0 ha per US$ of GDP —
1991 0 ha per US$ of GDP -22.8%
1992 0 ha per US$ of GDP -9.4%
1993 0 ha per US$ of GDP -1.8%
1994 0 ha per US$ of GDP -13.3%
1995 0 ha per US$ of GDP -22.4%
1996 0 ha per US$ of GDP -99.8%
1997 0 ha per US$ of GDP +0.6%
1998 0 ha per US$ of GDP -8.8%
1999 0 ha per US$ of GDP +2.7%
2000 0 ha per US$ of GDP -100.0%
2001 0 ha per US$ of GDP —
2002 0 ha per US$ of GDP +164.1%
2003 0 ha per US$ of GDP +520.0%
2004 0 ha per US$ of GDP -97.3%
2005 0 ha per US$ of GDP +1759.6%
2006 0 ha per US$ of GDP -97.2%
2007 0 ha per US$ of GDP -83.9%
2008 0 ha per US$ of GDP +60.6%
2009 0 ha per US$ of GDP +1296.9%
2010 0 ha per US$ of GDP +56.4%
2011 0 ha per US$ of GDP -86.1%
2012 0 ha per US$ of GDP +677.2%
2013 0 ha per US$ of GDP -21.4%
2014 0 ha per US$ of GDP -76.1%
2015 0 ha per US$ of GDP +38.1%
2016 0 ha per US$ of GDP -100.0%
2017 0 ha per US$ of GDP —
2018 0 ha per US$ of GDP +1544.8%
2019 0 ha per US$ of GDP -84.0%
2020 0 ha per US$ of GDP +712.7%
2021 0 ha per US$ of GDP -100.0%
2022 0 ha per US$ of GDP —
2023 0 ha per US$ of GDP -100.0%
2024 0 ha per US$ of GDP —

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Poland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2005 +1759.6% 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP
2018 +1544.8% 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP
2009 +1296.9% 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP
2020 +712.7% 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP
2012 +677.2% 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 10
2000s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 10
2010s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 10
2020s 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 0 ha per US$ of GDP 5

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 106 Czechia 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 107 Japan 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 108 Bangladesh 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 110 France 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 111 Germany 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 112 Aruba 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  7. 112 Andorra 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  8. 112 United Arab Emirates 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  9. 112 Armenia 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  10. 112 American Samoa 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  11. 112 Antigua and Barbuda 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  12. 112 Austria 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  13. 112 Belgium 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  14. 112 Burkina Faso 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  15. 112 Bahrain 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  16. 112 Bermuda 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  17. 112 Barbados 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  18. 112 Switzerland 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  19. 112 Cayman Islands 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  20. 112 Djibouti 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  21. 112 Dominica 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  22. 112 Denmark 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  23. 112 Eritrea 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  24. 112 Estonia 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  25. 112 Finland 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  26. 112 Fiji 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  27. 112 Faroe Islands 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  28. 112 Grenada 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  29. 112 Greenland 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  30. 112 Guam 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  31. 112 Isle of Man 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  32. 112 Ireland 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  33. 112 Israel 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  34. 112 Jordan 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  35. 112 Kyrgyzstan 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  36. 112 Kiribati 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  37. 112 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  38. 112 Kuwait 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  39. 112 Libya 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  40. 112 Saint Lucia 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  41. 112 Liechtenstein 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  42. 112 Lesotho 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  43. 112 Lithuania 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  44. 112 Luxembourg 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  45. 112 Latvia 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  46. 112 Monaco 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  47. 112 Maldives 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  48. 112 Marshall Islands 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  49. 112 Malta 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  50. 112 Northern Mariana Islands 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  51. 112 Mauritius 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  52. 112 Niger 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  53. 112 Norway 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  54. 112 Oman 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  55. 112 Palau 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  56. 112 Puerto Rico 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  57. 112 Palestine 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  58. 112 French Polynesia 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  59. 112 Qatar 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  60. 112 Saudi Arabia 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  61. 112 Singapore 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  62. 112 Solomon Islands 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  63. 112 San Marino 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  64. 112 Sao Tome and Principe 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  65. 112 Slovakia 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  66. 112 Slovenia 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  67. 112 Sweden 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  68. 112 Seychelles 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  69. 112 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  70. 112 Tajikistan 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  71. 112 Turkmenistan 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  72. 112 Tonga 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  73. 112 Tuvalu 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  74. 112 Uzbekistan 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  75. 112 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  76. 112 United States Virgin Islands 0 ha per US$ of GDP
  77. 112 Vanuatu 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  78. 112 Samoa 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  79. 112 Yemen 0 ha per US$ of GDP

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More climate change data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Poland?
Savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Poland was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2003.
What is the lowest savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2000.
How does Poland rank for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
Poland ranks 109th out of 185 countries with data for 2024.
Is savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 86.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/savanna-burned-area-per-unit-of-gdp/poland/">Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Poland</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Savanna — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

  • Savanna — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  • GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Unit
ha per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 6,274 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.