Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in South Africa
South Africa: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in South Africa, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in South Africa stood at 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 94.1% on the previous year and up 25.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in South Africa peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
South Africa ranks 45th of 185 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in South Africa, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +324.4% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +39.1% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.7% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -88.0% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -43.1% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -39.7% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +37.6% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -28.1% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +39.7% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +5.6% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.9% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -32.7% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +61.0% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +13.0% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -48.0% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +40.2% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -24.7% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -19.2% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +76.3% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -27.0% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +5.6% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -29.1% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +51.5% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +94.1% |
South Africa compared with similar countries
- South Africa's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 27.7× the median. (52 countries reporting)
- South Africa's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 13% of the median. (43 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in South Africa changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | +324.4% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
More climate change data for South Africa
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 717.27 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 34,365 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 11,741 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 22,624 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 44.31 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 807.99 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,495 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,119 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 376.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 19.32 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in South Africa?
- Savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in South Africa was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1998.
- What is the lowest savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does South Africa rank for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- South Africa ranks 45th out of 185 countries with data for 2024.
- Is savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Savanna — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Savanna — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.