Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP in Portugal
Portugal: Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP in Portugal, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp in Portugal stood at 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 360.5% on the previous year and up 952.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp in Portugal peaked at 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
That places Portugal 64th out of 185 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP in Portugal, year by year
| Year | kt per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -11.8% |
| 1992 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 1993 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +13.2% |
| 1994 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -4.7% |
| 1995 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 1996 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -70.8% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -59.7% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +450.0% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -56.5% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +20.7% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +61.2% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +3.9% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +476.1% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -81.7% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +209.8% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -81.2% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -73.2% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -83.8% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +2826.6% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +46.0% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -42.9% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -3.8% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +179.0% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -94.7% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +386.9% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +327.4% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +98.5% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -88.0% |
| 2019 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -63.0% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +133.8% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -80.4% |
| 2022 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +1420.6% |
| 2023 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -82.1% |
| 2024 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +360.5% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP in Portugal changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | +2826.6% | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP |
| 2022 | +1420.6% | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
- 61 Trinidad and Tobago 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 62 Bhutan 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 63 Panama 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 65 Serbia 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 66 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
- 67 Costa Rica 0 kt per US$ of GDP compare
More climate change data for Portugal
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 93.31 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,543 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,218 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 4,325 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 154.46 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 950.54 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 585.76 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 364.79 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 2.21 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp in Portugal?
- Savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp in Portugal was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2003.
- What is the lowest savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Portugal rank for savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Portugal ranks 64th out of 185 countries with data for 2024.
- Is savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is up 952.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Savanna — Emissions Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.