So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Cuba
Cuba: So emissions by world region in million tonnes was 268,354 in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2022)
268,354
Change on year
down 2.8%
World rank
34th
of 220 countries
All-time high
471,834
in 1988
All-time low
240.83
in 1860
Years of data
273
1750–2022
So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Cuba, 1750–2022
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 268,354 for so emissions by world region in million tonnes in 2022.
That represents a change of down 2.8% on the previous year and down 35.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, so emissions by world region in million tonnes in Cuba peaked at 471,834 in 1988 and was at its lowest, 240.83, in 1860.
Cuba ranks 34th of 220 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1750 | 1,417 | — |
| 1751 | 1,427 | +0.7% |
| 1752 | 1,437 | +0.7% |
| 1753 | 1,447 | +0.7% |
| 1754 | 1,457 | +0.7% |
| 1755 | 1,467 | +0.7% |
| 1756 | 1,477 | +0.7% |
| 1757 | 1,487 | +0.7% |
| 1758 | 1,497 | +0.7% |
| 1759 | 1,507 | +0.7% |
| 1760 | 1,517 | +0.7% |
| 1761 | 1,528 | +0.7% |
| 1762 | 1,539 | +0.7% |
| 1763 | 1,550 | +0.7% |
| 1764 | 1,561 | +0.7% |
| 1765 | 1,571 | +0.7% |
| 1766 | 1,582 | +0.7% |
| 1767 | 1,593 | +0.7% |
| 1768 | 1,604 | +0.7% |
| 1769 | 1,614 | +0.7% |
| 1770 | 1,625 | +0.7% |
| 1771 | 1,637 | +0.7% |
| 1772 | 1,648 | +0.7% |
| 1773 | 1,660 | +0.7% |
| 1774 | 1,671 | +0.7% |
| 1775 | 1,683 | +0.7% |
| 1776 | 1,694 | +0.7% |
| 1777 | 1,706 | +0.7% |
| 1778 | 1,717 | +0.7% |
| 1779 | 1,729 | +0.7% |
| 1780 | 1,740 | +0.7% |
| 1781 | 1,753 | +0.7% |
| 1782 | 1,765 | +0.7% |
| 1783 | 1,777 | +0.7% |
| 1784 | 1,790 | +0.7% |
| 1785 | 1,802 | +0.7% |
| 1786 | 1,814 | +0.7% |
| 1787 | 1,827 | +0.7% |
| 1788 | 1,839 | +0.7% |
| 1789 | 1,851 | +0.7% |
| 1790 | 1,864 | +0.7% |
| 1791 | 1,877 | +0.7% |
| 1792 | 1,890 | +0.7% |
| 1793 | 1,903 | +0.7% |
| 1794 | 1,917 | +0.7% |
| 1795 | 1,930 | +0.7% |
| 1796 | 1,943 | +0.7% |
| 1797 | 1,956 | +0.7% |
| 1798 | 1,969 | +0.7% |
| 1799 | 1,983 | +0.7% |
| 1800 | 1,996 | +0.7% |
| 1801 | 2,010 | +0.7% |
| 1802 | 2,024 | +0.7% |
| 1803 | 2,038 | +0.7% |
| 1804 | 2,052 | +0.7% |
| 1805 | 2,067 | +0.7% |
| 1806 | 2,081 | +0.7% |
| 1807 | 2,095 | +0.7% |
| 1808 | 2,109 | +0.7% |
| 1809 | 2,123 | +0.7% |
| 1810 | 2,137 | +0.7% |
| 1811 | 2,152 | +0.7% |
| 1812 | 2,167 | +0.7% |
| 1813 | 2,182 | +0.7% |
| 1814 | 2,198 | +0.7% |
| 1815 | 2,213 | +0.7% |
| 1816 | 2,228 | +0.7% |
| 1817 | 2,243 | +0.7% |
| 1818 | 2,258 | +0.7% |
| 1819 | 2,273 | +0.7% |
| 1820 | 2,288 | +0.7% |
| 1821 | 2,346 | +2.5% |
| 1822 | 2,404 | +2.5% |
| 1823 | 2,463 | +2.4% |
| 1824 | 2,521 | +2.4% |
| 1825 | 2,579 | +2.3% |
| 1826 | 2,637 | +2.3% |
| 1827 | 2,695 | +2.2% |
| 1828 | 2,753 | +2.2% |
| 1829 | 2,811 | +2.1% |
| 1830 | 2,869 | +2.1% |
| 1831 | 2,940 | +2.5% |
| 1832 | 3,012 | +2.4% |
| 1833 | 3,083 | +2.4% |
| 1834 | 3,155 | +2.3% |
| 1835 | 3,226 | +2.3% |
| 1836 | 3,298 | +2.2% |
| 1837 | 3,369 | +2.2% |
| 1838 | 3,440 | +2.1% |
| 1839 | 3,512 | +2.1% |
| 1840 | 3,583 | +2.0% |
| 1841 | 3,672 | +2.5% |
| 1842 | 3,762 | +2.4% |
| 1843 | 3,851 | +2.4% |
| 1844 | 3,940 | +2.3% |
| 1845 | 4,029 | +2.3% |
| 1846 | 4,119 | +2.2% |
| 1847 | 4,208 | +2.2% |
| 1848 | 4,297 | +2.1% |
| 1849 | 4,386 | +2.1% |
| 1850 | 6,749 | +53.9% |
| 1851 | 6,101 | -9.6% |
| 1852 | 5,444 | -10.8% |
| 1853 | 4,797 | -11.9% |
| 1854 | 4,140 | -13.7% |
| 1855 | 3,493 | -15.6% |
| 1856 | 2,847 | -18.5% |
| 1857 | 2,190 | -23.1% |
| 1858 | 1,544 | -29.5% |
| 1859 | 887.27 | -42.5% |
| 1860 | 240.83 | -72.9% |
| 1861 | 245.21 | +1.8% |
| 1862 | 249.59 | +1.8% |
| 1863 | 253.97 | +1.8% |
| 1864 | 258.37 | +1.7% |
| 1865 | 262.77 | +1.7% |
| 1866 | 268.24 | +2.1% |
| 1867 | 273.72 | +2.0% |
| 1868 | 279.2 | +2.0% |
| 1869 | 284.69 | +2.0% |
| 1870 | 290.19 | +1.9% |
| 1871 | 297.82 | +2.6% |
| 1872 | 305.06 | +2.4% |
| 1873 | 312.31 | +2.4% |
| 1874 | 319.58 | +2.3% |
| 1875 | 326.85 | +2.3% |
| 1876 | 336.01 | +2.8% |
| 1877 | 345.18 | +2.7% |
| 1878 | 354.36 | +2.7% |
| 1879 | 363.55 | +2.6% |
| 1880 | 372.75 | +2.5% |
| 1881 | 384.44 | +3.1% |
| 1882 | 396.15 | +3.0% |
| 1883 | 407.87 | +3.0% |
| 1884 | 419.6 | +2.9% |
| 1885 | 431.34 | +2.8% |
| 1886 | 446.37 | +3.5% |
| 1887 | 461.42 | +3.4% |
| 1888 | 476.48 | +3.3% |
| 1889 | 491.55 | +3.2% |
| 1890 | 506.63 | +3.1% |
| 1891 | 526.56 | +3.9% |
| 1892 | 546.5 | +3.8% |
| 1893 | 566.45 | +3.7% |
| 1894 | 586.41 | +3.5% |
| 1895 | 606.39 | +3.4% |
| 1896 | 632.47 | +4.3% |
| 1897 | 658.57 | +4.1% |
| 1898 | 684.67 | +4.0% |
| 1899 | 710.79 | +3.8% |
| 1900 | 736.92 | +3.7% |
| 1901 | 797.35 | +8.2% |
| 1902 | 857.74 | +7.6% |
| 1903 | 918.39 | +7.1% |
| 1904 | 976.18 | +6.3% |
| 1905 | 1,035 | +6.0% |
| 1906 | 2,591 | +150.4% |
| 1907 | 4,148 | +60.1% |
| 1908 | 5,705 | +37.5% |
| 1909 | 7,263 | +27.3% |
| 1910 | 8,821 | +21.4% |
| 1911 | 10,861 | +23.1% |
| 1912 | 12,912 | +18.9% |
| 1913 | 14,953 | +15.8% |
| 1914 | 17,004 | +13.7% |
| 1915 | 19,046 | +12.0% |
| 1916 | 18,441 | -3.2% |
| 1917 | 17,836 | -3.3% |
| 1918 | 17,222 | -3.4% |
| 1919 | 16,617 | -3.5% |
| 1920 | 16,012 | -3.6% |
| 1921 | 1,684 | -89.5% |
| 1922 | 1,766 | +4.8% |
| 1923 | 1,847 | +4.6% |
| 1924 | 1,928 | +4.4% |
| 1925 | 2,009 | +4.2% |
| 1926 | 2,048 | +1.9% |
| 1927 | 2,086 | +1.9% |
| 1928 | 2,124 | +1.8% |
| 1929 | 2,157 | +1.6% |
| 1930 | 2,196 | +1.8% |
| 1931 | 2,190 | -0.3% |
| 1932 | 2,185 | -0.3% |
| 1933 | 2,179 | -0.3% |
| 1934 | 2,173 | -0.3% |
| 1935 | 2,168 | -0.2% |
| 1936 | 2,144 | -1.1% |
| 1937 | 2,117 | -1.3% |
| 1938 | 2,091 | -1.2% |
| 1939 | 2,067 | -1.2% |
| 1940 | 2,044 | -1.1% |
| 1941 | 2,192 | +7.2% |
| 1942 | 2,327 | +6.2% |
| 1943 | 7,315 | +214.3% |
| 1944 | 11,934 | +63.2% |
| 1945 | 24,488 | +105.2% |
| 1946 | 25,657 | +4.8% |
| 1947 | 7,452 | -71.0% |
| 1948 | 3,382 | -54.6% |
| 1949 | 3,335 | -1.4% |
| 1950 | 61,647 | +1748.3% |
| 1951 | 70,009 | +13.6% |
| 1952 | 68,068 | -2.8% |
| 1953 | 83,387 | +22.5% |
| 1954 | 72,628 | -12.9% |
| 1955 | 101,502 | +39.8% |
| 1956 | 91,509 | -9.8% |
| 1957 | 175,712 | +92.0% |
| 1958 | 227,524 | +29.5% |
| 1959 | 202,433 | -11.0% |
| 1960 | 172,405 | -14.8% |
| 1961 | 140,980 | -18.2% |
| 1962 | 185,745 | +31.8% |
| 1963 | 170,183 | -8.4% |
| 1964 | 183,858 | +8.0% |
| 1965 | 187,443 | +1.9% |
| 1966 | 207,330 | +10.6% |
| 1967 | 230,402 | +11.1% |
| 1968 | 243,252 | +5.6% |
| 1969 | 251,736 | +3.5% |
| 1970 | 267,509 | +6.3% |
| 1971 | 299,352 | +11.9% |
| 1972 | 287,799 | -3.9% |
| 1973 | 264,748 | -8.0% |
| 1974 | 293,704 | +10.9% |
| 1975 | 292,903 | -0.3% |
| 1976 | 293,465 | +0.2% |
| 1977 | 328,706 | +12.0% |
| 1978 | 351,872 | +7.0% |
| 1979 | 336,718 | -4.3% |
| 1980 | 336,218 | -0.1% |
| 1981 | 334,661 | -0.5% |
| 1982 | 335,589 | +0.3% |
| 1983 | 383,013 | +14.1% |
| 1984 | 387,015 | +1.0% |
| 1985 | 352,417 | -8.9% |
| 1986 | 357,378 | +1.4% |
| 1987 | 387,425 | +8.4% |
| 1988 | 471,834 | +21.8% |
| 1989 | 458,193 | -2.9% |
| 1990 | 411,092 | -10.3% |
| 1991 | 331,473 | -19.4% |
| 1992 | 278,572 | -16.0% |
| 1993 | 268,025 | -3.8% |
| 1994 | 282,355 | +5.3% |
| 1995 | 314,498 | +11.4% |
| 1996 | 337,444 | +7.3% |
| 1997 | 381,084 | +12.9% |
| 1998 | 388,251 | +1.9% |
| 1999 | 388,629 | +0.1% |
| 2000 | 395,083 | +1.7% |
| 2001 | 387,878 | -1.8% |
| 2002 | 378,412 | -2.4% |
| 2003 | 370,467 | -2.1% |
| 2004 | 346,477 | -6.5% |
| 2005 | 359,678 | +3.8% |
| 2006 | 362,243 | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 361,780 | -0.1% |
| 2008 | 335,099 | -7.4% |
| 2009 | 364,904 | +8.9% |
| 2010 | 407,222 | +11.6% |
| 2011 | 379,959 | -6.7% |
| 2012 | 413,402 | +8.8% |
| 2013 | 387,904 | -6.2% |
| 2014 | 350,887 | -9.5% |
| 2015 | 385,905 | +10.0% |
| 2016 | 348,345 | -9.7% |
| 2017 | 323,116 | -7.2% |
| 2018 | 319,485 | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 314,074 | -1.7% |
| 2020 | 272,391 | -13.3% |
| 2021 | 276,176 | +1.4% |
| 2022 | 268,354 | -2.8% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 268,354 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 75,907, 3.5× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 268,354 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 21,354, 12.6× the median. (41 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | +1748.3% | 3,335 | 61,647 |
| 1943 | +214.3% | 2,327 | 7,315 |
| 1906 | +150.4% | 1,035 | 2,591 |
| 1945 | +105.2% | 11,934 | 24,488 |
| 1957 | +92.0% | 91,509 | 175,712 |
| 1921 | -89.5% | 16,012 | 1,684 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1750s | 1,462 | 1,417 | 1,507 | 10 |
| 1760s | 1,566 | 1,517 | 1,614 | 10 |
| 1770s | 1,677 | 1,625 | 1,729 | 10 |
| 1780s | 1,796 | 1,740 | 1,851 | 10 |
| 1790s | 1,923 | 1,864 | 1,983 | 10 |
| 1800s | 2,059 | 1,996 | 2,123 | 10 |
| 1810s | 2,205 | 2,137 | 2,273 | 10 |
| 1820s | 2,550 | 2,288 | 2,811 | 10 |
| 1830s | 3,190 | 2,869 | 3,512 | 10 |
| 1840s | 3,985 | 3,583 | 4,386 | 10 |
| 1850s | 3,819 | 887.27 | 6,749 | 10 |
| 1860s | 261.66 | 240.83 | 284.69 | 10 |
| 1870s | 325.09 | 290.19 | 363.55 | 10 |
| 1880s | 428.8 | 372.75 | 491.55 | 10 |
| 1890s | 602.54 | 506.63 | 710.79 | 10 |
| 1900s | 2,503 | 736.92 | 7,263 | 10 |
| 1910s | 15,371 | 8,821 | 19,046 | 10 |
| 1920s | 3,366 | 1,684 | 16,012 | 10 |
| 1930s | 2,151 | 2,067 | 2,196 | 10 |
| 1940s | 9,013 | 2,044 | 25,657 | 10 |
| 1950s | 115,442 | 61,647 | 227,524 | 10 |
| 1960s | 197,333 | 140,980 | 251,736 | 10 |
| 1970s | 301,678 | 264,748 | 351,872 | 10 |
| 1980s | 380,374 | 334,661 | 471,834 | 10 |
| 1990s | 338,142 | 268,025 | 411,092 | 10 |
| 2000s | 366,202 | 335,099 | 395,083 | 10 |
| 2010s | 363,030 | 314,074 | 413,402 | 10 |
| 2020s | 272,307 | 268,354 | 276,176 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is so emissions by world region in million tonnes in Cuba?
- So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Cuba was 268,354 in 2022, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest so emissions by world region in million tonnes recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 471,834 in 1988.
- What is the lowest so emissions by world region in million tonnes recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 240.83 in 1860.
- How does Cuba rank for so emissions by world region in million tonnes?
- Cuba ranks 34th out of 220 countries with data for 2022.
- Is so emissions by world region in million tonnes rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of So emissions by world region in million tonnes. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 273 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).