So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: So emissions by world region in million tonnes was 1.06 million in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2022)
1.06 million
Change on year
up 2.1%
World rank
15th
of 220 countries
All-time high
3.62 million
in 1975
All-time low
54.95
in 1750
Years of data
273
1750–2022
So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Kazakhstan, 1750–2022
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 1.06 million for so emissions by world region in million tonnes in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.1% on the previous year and down 5.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, so emissions by world region in million tonnes in Kazakhstan peaked at 3.62 million in 1975 and was at its lowest, 54.95, in 1750.
Kazakhstan ranks 15th of 220 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1750 | 54.95 | — |
| 1751 | 55.16 | +0.4% |
| 1752 | 55.36 | +0.4% |
| 1753 | 55.56 | +0.4% |
| 1754 | 55.77 | +0.4% |
| 1755 | 55.97 | +0.4% |
| 1756 | 56.17 | +0.4% |
| 1757 | 56.38 | +0.4% |
| 1758 | 56.58 | +0.4% |
| 1759 | 56.78 | +0.4% |
| 1760 | 56.99 | +0.4% |
| 1761 | 57.2 | +0.4% |
| 1762 | 57.41 | +0.4% |
| 1763 | 57.62 | +0.4% |
| 1764 | 57.83 | +0.4% |
| 1765 | 58.04 | +0.4% |
| 1766 | 58.25 | +0.4% |
| 1767 | 58.46 | +0.4% |
| 1768 | 58.68 | +0.4% |
| 1769 | 58.89 | +0.4% |
| 1770 | 59.1 | +0.4% |
| 1771 | 59.32 | +0.4% |
| 1772 | 59.54 | +0.4% |
| 1773 | 59.75 | +0.4% |
| 1774 | 59.97 | +0.4% |
| 1775 | 60.19 | +0.4% |
| 1776 | 60.41 | +0.4% |
| 1777 | 60.63 | +0.4% |
| 1778 | 60.85 | +0.4% |
| 1779 | 61.07 | +0.4% |
| 1780 | 64.43 | +5.5% |
| 1781 | 64.53 | +0.2% |
| 1782 | 64.83 | +0.5% |
| 1783 | 65.14 | +0.5% |
| 1784 | 65.27 | +0.2% |
| 1785 | 65.69 | +0.6% |
| 1786 | 66.07 | +0.6% |
| 1787 | 66.35 | +0.4% |
| 1788 | 66.59 | +0.4% |
| 1789 | 66.75 | +0.2% |
| 1790 | 67.11 | +0.5% |
| 1791 | 67.58 | +0.7% |
| 1792 | 67.34 | -0.4% |
| 1793 | 67.92 | +0.9% |
| 1794 | 68.02 | +0.1% |
| 1795 | 68.37 | +0.5% |
| 1796 | 68.25 | -0.2% |
| 1797 | 68.66 | +0.6% |
| 1798 | 69.1 | +0.6% |
| 1799 | 69.76 | +1.0% |
| 1800 | 70.14 | +0.5% |
| 1801 | 70.55 | +0.6% |
| 1802 | 70.57 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 70.59 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 71 | +0.6% |
| 1805 | 70.91 | -0.1% |
| 1806 | 71.04 | +0.2% |
| 1807 | 71.2 | +0.2% |
| 1808 | 71.44 | +0.3% |
| 1809 | 71.68 | +0.3% |
| 1810 | 71.84 | +0.2% |
| 1811 | 71.91 | +0.1% |
| 1812 | 71.64 | -0.4% |
| 1813 | 71.57 | -0.1% |
| 1814 | 71.42 | -0.2% |
| 1815 | 71.54 | +0.2% |
| 1816 | 71.65 | +0.2% |
| 1817 | 71.77 | +0.2% |
| 1818 | 71.68 | -0.1% |
| 1819 | 71.85 | +0.2% |
| 1820 | 71.97 | +0.2% |
| 1821 | 72.62 | +0.9% |
| 1822 | 72.49 | -0.2% |
| 1823 | 72.42 | -0.1% |
| 1824 | 72.21 | -0.3% |
| 1825 | 72.7 | +0.7% |
| 1826 | 72.7 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 73.42 | +1.0% |
| 1828 | 73.29 | -0.2% |
| 1829 | 73.56 | +0.4% |
| 1830 | 88.33 | +20.1% |
| 1831 | 91.21 | +3.3% |
| 1832 | 84.72 | -7.1% |
| 1833 | 87.05 | +2.8% |
| 1834 | 73 | -16.1% |
| 1835 | 73.17 | +0.2% |
| 1836 | 73.3 | +0.2% |
| 1837 | 73.51 | +0.3% |
| 1838 | 73.27 | -0.3% |
| 1839 | 73.28 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 73.42 | +0.2% |
| 1841 | 73.21 | -0.3% |
| 1842 | 73.4 | +0.3% |
| 1843 | 73.45 | +0.1% |
| 1844 | 73.35 | -0.1% |
| 1845 | 73.39 | +0.1% |
| 1846 | 73.99 | +0.8% |
| 1847 | 73.57 | -0.6% |
| 1848 | 73.63 | +0.1% |
| 1849 | 73.47 | -0.2% |
| 1850 | 151.42 | +106.1% |
| 1851 | 73.78 | -51.3% |
| 1852 | 73.9 | +0.2% |
| 1853 | 74.31 | +0.6% |
| 1854 | 74.13 | -0.2% |
| 1855 | 295.08 | +298.1% |
| 1856 | 74.58 | -74.7% |
| 1857 | 73.87 | -0.9% |
| 1858 | 376.59 | +409.8% |
| 1859 | 393.13 | +4.4% |
| 1860 | 490.3 | +24.7% |
| 1861 | 604.55 | +23.3% |
| 1862 | 552.06 | -8.7% |
| 1863 | 574.38 | +4.0% |
| 1864 | 634.1 | +10.4% |
| 1865 | 610.4 | -3.7% |
| 1866 | 1,743 | +185.6% |
| 1867 | 1,982 | +13.7% |
| 1868 | 1,658 | -16.3% |
| 1869 | 2,220 | +33.9% |
| 1870 | 2,402 | +8.2% |
| 1871 | 3,255 | +35.5% |
| 1872 | 3,380 | +3.8% |
| 1873 | 3,196 | -5.4% |
| 1874 | 3,888 | +21.7% |
| 1875 | 4,479 | +15.2% |
| 1876 | 5,553 | +24.0% |
| 1877 | 5,654 | +1.8% |
| 1878 | 7,446 | +31.7% |
| 1879 | 7,645 | +2.7% |
| 1880 | 9,038 | +18.2% |
| 1881 | 9,412 | +4.1% |
| 1882 | 9,915 | +5.3% |
| 1883 | 11,355 | +14.5% |
| 1884 | 11,298 | -0.5% |
| 1885 | 12,185 | +7.8% |
| 1886 | 12,549 | +3.0% |
| 1887 | 13,071 | +4.2% |
| 1888 | 13,750 | +5.2% |
| 1889 | 15,091 | +9.8% |
| 1890 | 16,922 | +12.1% |
| 1891 | 18,669 | +10.3% |
| 1892 | 20,125 | +7.8% |
| 1893 | 23,815 | +18.3% |
| 1894 | 24,917 | +4.6% |
| 1895 | 28,288 | +13.5% |
| 1896 | 29,292 | +3.5% |
| 1897 | 34,251 | +16.9% |
| 1898 | 38,794 | +13.3% |
| 1899 | 46,185 | +19.1% |
| 1900 | 52,566 | +13.8% |
| 1901 | 53,096 | +1.0% |
| 1902 | 51,404 | -3.2% |
| 1903 | 51,010 | -0.8% |
| 1904 | 57,042 | +11.8% |
| 1905 | 51,606 | -9.5% |
| 1906 | 58,392 | +13.1% |
| 1907 | 65,568 | +12.3% |
| 1908 | 65,818 | +0.4% |
| 1909 | 69,094 | +5.0% |
| 1910 | 67,206 | -2.7% |
| 1911 | 72,358 | +7.7% |
| 1912 | 85,007 | +17.5% |
| 1913 | 95,755 | +12.6% |
| 1914 | 87,454 | -8.7% |
| 1915 | 80,614 | -7.8% |
| 1916 | 87,939 | +9.1% |
| 1917 | 83,189 | -5.4% |
| 1918 | 33,836 | -59.3% |
| 1919 | 28,147 | -16.8% |
| 1920 | 26,402 | -6.2% |
| 1921 | 29,063 | +10.1% |
| 1922 | 35,388 | +21.8% |
| 1923 | 38,986 | +10.2% |
| 1924 | 47,495 | +21.8% |
| 1925 | 46,687 | -1.7% |
| 1926 | 68,805 | +47.4% |
| 1927 | 85,888 | +24.8% |
| 1928 | 99,741 | +16.1% |
| 1929 | 107,288 | +7.6% |
| 1930 | 181,488 | +69.2% |
| 1931 | 212,638 | +17.2% |
| 1932 | 249,141 | +17.2% |
| 1933 | 292,811 | +17.5% |
| 1934 | 375,802 | +28.3% |
| 1935 | 433,767 | +15.4% |
| 1936 | 517,768 | +19.4% |
| 1937 | 547,421 | +5.7% |
| 1938 | 613,265 | +12.0% |
| 1939 | 655,766 | +6.9% |
| 1940 | 747,934 | +14.1% |
| 1941 | 692,498 | -7.4% |
| 1942 | 564,555 | -18.5% |
| 1943 | 620,385 | +9.9% |
| 1944 | 577,997 | -6.8% |
| 1945 | 591,905 | +2.4% |
| 1946 | 625,761 | +5.7% |
| 1947 | 728,621 | +16.4% |
| 1948 | 766,332 | +5.2% |
| 1949 | 834,903 | +8.9% |
| 1950 | 926,019 | +10.9% |
| 1951 | 1.03 million | +11.5% |
| 1952 | 1.48 million | +43.6% |
| 1953 | 1.28 million | -13.9% |
| 1954 | 1.36 million | +6.3% |
| 1955 | 1.51 million | +11.5% |
| 1956 | 1.66 million | +9.5% |
| 1957 | 2.12 million | +28.2% |
| 1958 | 2.23 million | +4.9% |
| 1959 | 2.26 million | +1.5% |
| 1960 | 2.30 million | +1.5% |
| 1961 | 2.48 million | +8.1% |
| 1962 | 2.62 million | +5.7% |
| 1963 | 2.19 million | -16.6% |
| 1964 | 2.19 million | -0.0% |
| 1965 | 2.27 million | +3.7% |
| 1966 | 2.51 million | +10.8% |
| 1967 | 2.74 million | +9.1% |
| 1968 | 2.95 million | +7.7% |
| 1969 | 3.08 million | +4.4% |
| 1970 | 3.15 million | +2.3% |
| 1971 | 3.31 million | +4.8% |
| 1972 | 3.41 million | +3.2% |
| 1973 | 3.60 million | +5.4% |
| 1974 | 3.62 million | +0.7% |
| 1975 | 3.62 million | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 3.57 million | -1.5% |
| 1977 | 3.47 million | -2.7% |
| 1978 | 3.39 million | -2.5% |
| 1979 | 3.41 million | +0.8% |
| 1980 | 3.51 million | +2.9% |
| 1981 | 3.50 million | -0.3% |
| 1982 | 3.34 million | -4.6% |
| 1983 | 3.42 million | +2.5% |
| 1984 | 3.47 million | +1.6% |
| 1985 | 3.42 million | -1.5% |
| 1986 | 3.32 million | -2.9% |
| 1987 | 3.29 million | -1.1% |
| 1988 | 3.19 million | -3.0% |
| 1989 | 3.09 million | -3.1% |
| 1990 | 3.49 million | +12.9% |
| 1991 | 3.55 million | +1.6% |
| 1992 | 3.13 million | -11.8% |
| 1993 | 2.82 million | -10.1% |
| 1994 | 2.65 million | -6.0% |
| 1995 | 2.22 million | -16.3% |
| 1996 | 2.26 million | +2.0% |
| 1997 | 2.17 million | -4.1% |
| 1998 | 2.26 million | +4.2% |
| 1999 | 2.15 million | -4.6% |
| 2000 | 2.15 million | -0.3% |
| 2001 | 2.31 million | +7.7% |
| 2002 | 2.38 million | +2.9% |
| 2003 | 2.44 million | +2.6% |
| 2004 | 2.54 million | +3.9% |
| 2005 | 2.60 million | +2.3% |
| 2006 | 2.63 million | +1.2% |
| 2007 | 2.25 million | -14.2% |
| 2008 | 1.95 million | -13.4% |
| 2009 | 1.40 million | -28.3% |
| 2010 | 1.20 million | -14.0% |
| 2011 | 1.18 million | -1.7% |
| 2012 | 1.12 million | -5.5% |
| 2013 | 1.15 million | +3.2% |
| 2014 | 1.03 million | -11.0% |
| 2015 | 982,491 | -4.2% |
| 2016 | 966,215 | -1.7% |
| 2017 | 953,364 | -1.3% |
| 2018 | 974,409 | +2.2% |
| 2019 | 981,640 | +0.7% |
| 2020 | 985,457 | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 1.04 million | +5.3% |
| 2022 | 1.06 million | +2.1% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 1.06 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 75,907, 14.0× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 1.06 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 40,466, 26.2× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1858 | +409.8% | 73.87 | 376.59 |
| 1855 | +298.1% | 74.13 | 295.08 |
| 1866 | +185.6% | 610.4 | 1,743 |
| 1850 | +106.1% | 73.47 | 151.42 |
| 1856 | -74.7% | 295.08 | 74.58 |
| 1930 | +69.2% | 107,288 | 181,488 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1750s | 55.87 | 54.95 | 56.78 | 10 |
| 1760s | 57.94 | 56.99 | 58.89 | 10 |
| 1770s | 60.08 | 59.1 | 61.07 | 10 |
| 1780s | 65.56 | 64.43 | 66.75 | 10 |
| 1790s | 68.21 | 67.11 | 69.76 | 10 |
| 1800s | 70.91 | 70.14 | 71.68 | 10 |
| 1810s | 71.69 | 71.42 | 71.91 | 10 |
| 1820s | 72.74 | 71.97 | 73.56 | 10 |
| 1830s | 79.08 | 73 | 91.21 | 10 |
| 1840s | 73.49 | 73.21 | 73.99 | 10 |
| 1850s | 166.08 | 73.78 | 393.13 | 10 |
| 1860s | 1,107 | 490.3 | 2,220 | 10 |
| 1870s | 4,690 | 2,402 | 7,645 | 10 |
| 1880s | 11,766 | 9,038 | 15,091 | 10 |
| 1890s | 28,126 | 16,922 | 46,185 | 10 |
| 1900s | 57,560 | 51,010 | 69,094 | 10 |
| 1910s | 72,151 | 28,147 | 95,755 | 10 |
| 1920s | 58,574 | 26,402 | 107,288 | 10 |
| 1930s | 407,987 | 181,488 | 655,766 | 10 |
| 1940s | 675,089 | 564,555 | 834,903 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.59 million | 926,019 | 2.26 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.53 million | 2.19 million | 3.08 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 3.46 million | 3.15 million | 3.62 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.36 million | 3.09 million | 3.51 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.67 million | 2.15 million | 3.55 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.26 million | 1.40 million | 2.63 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.05 million | 953,364 | 1.20 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.03 million | 985,457 | 1.06 million | 3 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is so emissions by world region in million tonnes in Kazakhstan?
- So emissions by world region in million tonnes in Kazakhstan was 1.06 million in 2022, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest so emissions by world region in million tonnes recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.62 million in 1975.
- What is the lowest so emissions by world region in million tonnes recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 54.95 in 1750.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for so emissions by world region in million tonnes?
- Kazakhstan ranks 15th out of 220 countries with data for 2022.
- Is so emissions by world region in million tonnes rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of So emissions by world region in million tonnes. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 273 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).