Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate in Eswatini

Eswatini: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate was 3.85 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
3.85 % change on previous year
World rank
12th
of 100 countries
All-time high
100 % change on previous year
in 1963
All-time low
-16.67 % change on previous year
in 1964
Years of data
62
1962–2023

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate in Eswatini, 1962–2023

-250255075100196219922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

In 2023, sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate in Eswatini stood at 3.85 % change on previous year.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate in Eswatini peaked at 100 % change on previous year in 1963 and was at its lowest, -16.67 % change on previous year, in 1964.

Eswatini ranks 12th of 100 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate in Eswatini, year by year

Annual values for Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate in Eswatini, 1962 to 2023.
Year % change on previous year Change
1962 50 % change on previous year —
1963 100 % change on previous year +100.0%
1964 -16.67 % change on previous year -116.7%
1965 20 % change on previous year -220.0%
1966 -16.67 % change on previous year -183.3%
1967 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1968 20 % change on previous year —
1969 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1970 16.67 % change on previous year —
1971 -14.29 % change on previous year -185.7%
1972 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1973 16.67 % change on previous year —
1974 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1975 14.29 % change on previous year —
1976 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1977 12.5 % change on previous year —
1978 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1979 11.11 % change on previous year —
1980 20 % change on previous year +80.0%
1981 16.67 % change on previous year -16.7%
1982 14.29 % change on previous year -14.3%
1983 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1984 -6.25 % change on previous year —
1985 6.67 % change on previous year -206.7%
1986 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1987 0 % change on previous year —
1988 0 % change on previous year —
1989 0 % change on previous year —
1990 6.25 % change on previous year —
1991 5.88 % change on previous year -5.9%
1992 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1993 0 % change on previous year —
1994 0 % change on previous year —
1995 -5.56 % change on previous year —
1996 5.88 % change on previous year -205.9%
1997 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
1998 0 % change on previous year —
1999 0 % change on previous year —
2000 -5.56 % change on previous year —
2001 11.76 % change on previous year -311.8%
2002 10.53 % change on previous year -10.5%
2003 4.76 % change on previous year -54.8%
2004 4.55 % change on previous year -4.5%
2005 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2006 4.35 % change on previous year —
2007 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2008 0 % change on previous year —
2009 0 % change on previous year —
2010 0 % change on previous year —
2011 4.17 % change on previous year —
2012 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2013 4 % change on previous year —
2014 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2015 0 % change on previous year —
2016 0 % change on previous year —
2017 0 % change on previous year —
2018 3.85 % change on previous year —
2019 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2020 0 % change on previous year —
2021 -3.7 % change on previous year —
2022 0 % change on previous year -100.0%
2023 3.85 % change on previous year —

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 19.58 % change on previous year -16.67 % change on previous year 100 % change on previous year 8
1970s 5.69 % change on previous year -14.29 % change on previous year 16.67 % change on previous year 10
1980s 5.14 % change on previous year -6.25 % change on previous year 20 % change on previous year 10
1990s 1.25 % change on previous year -5.56 % change on previous year 6.25 % change on previous year 10
2000s 3.04 % change on previous year -5.56 % change on previous year 11.76 % change on previous year 10
2010s 1.2 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 4.17 % change on previous year 10
2020s 0.0356 % change on previous year -3.7 % change on previous year 3.85 % change on previous year 4

Countries ranked near Eswatini

  1. 9 Zimbabwe 5.88 % change on previous year compare
  2. 10 Peru 5.56 % change on previous year compare
  3. 11 Viet Nam 3.9 % change on previous year compare
  4. 12 Democratic Republic of the Congo 3.85 % change on previous year compare
  5. 14 Nepal 3.57 % change on previous year compare
  6. 14 Sudan 3.57 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 130 places →

More climate change data for Eswatini

All data for Eswatini →

Frequently asked questions

What is sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate in Eswatini?
Sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate in Eswatini was 3.85 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate recorded in Eswatini?
The highest recorded value was 100 % change on previous year in 1963.
What is the lowest sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate recorded in Eswatini?
The lowest recorded value was -16.67 % change on previous year in 1964.
How does Eswatini rank for sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 12th out of 100 countries with data for 2023.
Is sugar cane — burning crop residues (emissions n2o), annual growth rate rising or falling in Eswatini?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Eswatini data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate in Eswatini. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/">Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate in Eswatini</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
130 places, 7,209 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.