Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Angola
Angola: Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Angola, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Angola is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 14.6% on the previous year and up 86.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Angola peaked at 0.0026 ha per US$ of GDP in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2014.
That places Angola 3rd out of 184 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Angola, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | +5.9% |
| 1992 | 0.0008 ha per US$ of GDP | +27.6% |
| 1993 | 0.0012 ha per US$ of GDP | +44.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0015 ha per US$ of GDP | +30.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0012 ha per US$ of GDP | -19.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0022 ha per US$ of GDP | +79.8% |
| 1997 | 0.0021 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 1998 | 0.0026 ha per US$ of GDP | +26.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0025 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.1% |
| 2000 | 0.0017 ha per US$ of GDP | -31.7% |
| 2001 | 0.0005 ha per US$ of GDP | -70.2% |
| 2002 | 0.0003 ha per US$ of GDP | -36.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0003 ha per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | -34.1% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -38.8% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -35.6% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -24.5% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -28.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | +27.7% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -19.8% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -32.6% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +10.1% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +61.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | +70.2% |
| 2017 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -42.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | +84.6% |
| 2020 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | +5.1% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | -9.7% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -46.0% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +31.0% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +14.6% |
Angola compared with similar countries
- Angola's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 15850.2× the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Angola's 0 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, 1724.8× the median. (43 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0015 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0026 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0004 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0017 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 1 Zambia 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 2 Mozambique 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 4 Central African Republic 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 5 Sierra Leone 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
- 6 Congo 0 ha per US$ of GDP compare
More climate change data for Angola
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 42.42 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 13,873 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,998 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,875 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 18.86 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 316.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 694.89 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 496.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 198.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.87 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Angola?
- Woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp in Angola was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0026 ha per US$ of GDP in 1998.
- What is the lowest woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2014.
- How does Angola rank for woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Angola ranks 3rd out of 184 countries with data for 2024.
- Is woody savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is up 86.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Woody savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Woody savanna — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Woody savanna — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Woody savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.